Skip to main content
Log in

Three-year follow-up of blood pressure after treating hypertensive patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis

  • Original Article - Vascular
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Blood pressure (BP) was reported to decrease significantly after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid stenting (CAS) up to the 1-year follow-up. We evaluated changes in BP for 3 years after treating hypertensive patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis by either CEA or CAS and determined predisposing factors for normotensive BP at the 3-year follow-up.

Methods

A total of 123 hypertensive patients with at least 3 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up after treatment were included in this study and placed in the CEA (n = 65) or CAS group (n = 58). BP changes for 3 years, the number of patients with a normotensive BP (≤120/80 mmHg), and the percentage decrease in BP were evaluated and compared between groups.

Results

Compared to pretreatment BP, the CEA group had significantly decreased BP at the 1- and 2-year follow-up (p < 0.05), but not the 3-year follow-up. The CAS group had significantly decreased BP at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up (p < 0.05). Stenosis location (body lesions over apical lesions; OR = 1.526, 95 % CI, 1.341 to 6.224; p = 0.034) was an independent predisposing factor for normotensive BP at the 3-year follow-up.

Conclusions

For hypertensive patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, BP was lowered at 3 years after both CEA and CAS compared to pretreatment BP. CAS might lower BP better over the long term than did CEA, and hypertensive patients with stenosis at body lesions might be normotensive at 3 years after CEA or CAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altinbas A, Algra A, Brown NM, Featherstone RL, Kappelle LJ, de Borst GJ, Mali WP, van der Worp HB (2011) Effects of carotid endarterectomy or stenting on blood pressure in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Stroke 42:3491–3496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagshaw RJ, Barrer SJ (1987) Effects of angioplasty upon carotid sinus mechanical properties and blood pressure control in the dog. Neurosurgery 21:324–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD, White A, Cushman WC, White W, Sica D, Ferdinand K, Giles TD, Falkner B, Carey RM, American Heart Association Professional Education Committee (2008) Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 117:e510–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung J, Kim YB, Hong C-K, Suh SH, Choi E-Y, Lee HJ, Lim YC, Shin YS, Joo JY (2014) Blood pressure-lowering effect of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Acta Neurochir 156:69–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung J, Kim BM, Paik HK, Hyun D-K, Park H (2012) Effects of carotid artery stenosis treatment on blood pressure. J Neurosurg 117:755–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Furlan R, Diedrich A, Rimoldi A, Palazzolo L, Porta C, Diedrich L, Harris PA, Sleight P, Biagioni I, Robertson D, Bernardi L (2003) Effects of unilateral and bilateral carotid baroreflex stimulation on cardiac and neural sympathetic discharge oscillatory patterns. Circulation 108:717–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Omvik P, Gerhardsen G (2003) The Norwegian office-, home-, and ambulatory blood pressure study (NOHA). Blood Press 12:211–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Park ST, Kim JK, Yoon KH, Park SO, Park SW, Kim JS, Kim SJ, Suh DC (2010) Atherosclerotic carotid stenoses of apical versus body lesions in high-risk carotid stenting patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:1106–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suh DC, Kim JL, KimEH KJK, Shin JH, HyunDH LHY, Lee DH, Kim JS (2012) Carotid baroreceptor reaction after stenting in 2 locations of carotid bulb lesions of different embryologic origin. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:977–981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, Kessels AG, de Leeuw PW (2005) Home blood pressure measurement: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:743–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zanchetti A (1987) The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice. Am J Hypertens 10:1069–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joonho Chung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patient-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of retrospective study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, CK., Shim, Y.S., Lim, Y.C. et al. Three-year follow-up of blood pressure after treating hypertensive patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Acta Neurochir 158, 2385–2392 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2990-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2990-2

Keywords

Navigation