Abstract
Background
Blood pressure (BP) was reported to decrease significantly after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid stenting (CAS) up to the 1-year follow-up. We evaluated changes in BP for 3 years after treating hypertensive patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis by either CEA or CAS and determined predisposing factors for normotensive BP at the 3-year follow-up.
Methods
A total of 123 hypertensive patients with at least 3 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up after treatment were included in this study and placed in the CEA (n = 65) or CAS group (n = 58). BP changes for 3 years, the number of patients with a normotensive BP (≤120/80 mmHg), and the percentage decrease in BP were evaluated and compared between groups.
Results
Compared to pretreatment BP, the CEA group had significantly decreased BP at the 1- and 2-year follow-up (p < 0.05), but not the 3-year follow-up. The CAS group had significantly decreased BP at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up (p < 0.05). Stenosis location (body lesions over apical lesions; OR = 1.526, 95 % CI, 1.341 to 6.224; p = 0.034) was an independent predisposing factor for normotensive BP at the 3-year follow-up.
Conclusions
For hypertensive patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, BP was lowered at 3 years after both CEA and CAS compared to pretreatment BP. CAS might lower BP better over the long term than did CEA, and hypertensive patients with stenosis at body lesions might be normotensive at 3 years after CEA or CAS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altinbas A, Algra A, Brown NM, Featherstone RL, Kappelle LJ, de Borst GJ, Mali WP, van der Worp HB (2011) Effects of carotid endarterectomy or stenting on blood pressure in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Stroke 42:3491–3496
Bagshaw RJ, Barrer SJ (1987) Effects of angioplasty upon carotid sinus mechanical properties and blood pressure control in the dog. Neurosurgery 21:324–330
Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD, White A, Cushman WC, White W, Sica D, Ferdinand K, Giles TD, Falkner B, Carey RM, American Heart Association Professional Education Committee (2008) Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 117:e510–526
Chung J, Kim YB, Hong C-K, Suh SH, Choi E-Y, Lee HJ, Lim YC, Shin YS, Joo JY (2014) Blood pressure-lowering effect of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Acta Neurochir 156:69–75
Chung J, Kim BM, Paik HK, Hyun D-K, Park H (2012) Effects of carotid artery stenosis treatment on blood pressure. J Neurosurg 117:755–760
Furlan R, Diedrich A, Rimoldi A, Palazzolo L, Porta C, Diedrich L, Harris PA, Sleight P, Biagioni I, Robertson D, Bernardi L (2003) Effects of unilateral and bilateral carotid baroreflex stimulation on cardiac and neural sympathetic discharge oscillatory patterns. Circulation 108:717–723
Omvik P, Gerhardsen G (2003) The Norwegian office-, home-, and ambulatory blood pressure study (NOHA). Blood Press 12:211–219
Park ST, Kim JK, Yoon KH, Park SO, Park SW, Kim JS, Kim SJ, Suh DC (2010) Atherosclerotic carotid stenoses of apical versus body lesions in high-risk carotid stenting patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:1106–1112
Suh DC, Kim JL, KimEH KJK, Shin JH, HyunDH LHY, Lee DH, Kim JS (2012) Carotid baroreceptor reaction after stenting in 2 locations of carotid bulb lesions of different embryologic origin. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:977–981
Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, Kessels AG, de Leeuw PW (2005) Home blood pressure measurement: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:743–751
Zanchetti A (1987) The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice. Am J Hypertens 10:1069–1080
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patient-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of retrospective study formal consent is not required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, CK., Shim, Y.S., Lim, Y.C. et al. Three-year follow-up of blood pressure after treating hypertensive patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Acta Neurochir 158, 2385–2392 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2990-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2990-2