Abstract
Due to the influence of the errors of time difference of arrivals (TDOA) and the premeasured velocity in the propagation medium, the existing methods always hold the low location accuracy and efficiency. To increase the location accuracy, the joint inversion of AE/MS sources and propagation velocity is proposed using the full measurements and residual estimation. First, the control equation of the unknown wave velocity is constructed using sensor coordinates and full TDOA measurements, and it is linearized by introducing the additive variables. Second, considering the influence of TDOA errors, the residuals of the TDOA equations are calculated to obtain weights. Finally, the orthogonal projection is applied to separate the additive variables and solve the weighted linear equations for source coordinates. The pencil–lead breaks experiments are carried out to verify the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method. The results show that the novel method holds better accuracy and wave velocity inversion than the pre-existing methods. The average positioning error of the novel method is only 3.49 mm, while the errors of the traditional methods are 4.62 mm, 5.08 mm, 6.57 mm, and 11.93 mm, respectively. The positioning performance of the proposed method under different TDOA errors is further proved by simulation tests. The simulation results demonstrate that the positioning performance of the proposed method is better than that of the existing methods under different errors. Moreover, the blast vibration experiment validates that the proposed method holds the location accuracy of 16.65 m, which presents good prospects in engineering applications.
Highlights
-
No prior measurement of wave speeds and selection of reference sensors reduce the effect of velocity and arrival errors.
-
Analytical solution being given by linearizing the control equation, complex computations and local convergence are circumvented.
-
Estimating the noise term in the arrival time difference, the tolerance to TDOA errors is improved.
-
Redundant time-difference-of-arrival measurements are fully used to provide new constraints.
-
Blasting experiments reveal that positioning accuracy of the method is 72% more accurate than the traditional method.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-024-03917-3/MediaObjects/603_2024_3917_Fig16_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data used to support the fndings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Abel J, Smith J (1987) The spherical interpolation method for closed-form passive source localization using range difference measurements. In: ICASSP ’87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Dallas, TX, USA, pp 471–474
Annibale P, Rabenstein R (2014) Closed-form estimation of the speed of propagating waves from time measurements. Multidimens Syst Signal Process 25:361–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-013-0231-x
Cao W, Durucan S, Cai W et al (2020) A physics-based probabilistic forecasting methodology for hazardous microseismicity associated with longwall coal mining. Int J Coal Geol 232:103627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2020.103627
Chan YT, Ho KC (1994) A simple and efficient estimator for hyperbolic location. IEEE Trans Signal Process 42:1905–1915. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.301830
Cheng J, Song G, Sun X et al (2018) Research developments and prospects on microseismic source location in mines. Engineering 4:653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.08.004
Dong L, Li X, Zhou Z et al (2015) Three-dimensional analytical solution of acoustic emission source location for cuboid monitoring network without pre-measured wave velocity. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 25:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63604-4
Dong L, Shu W, Li X et al (2017) Three dimensional comprehensive analytical solutions for locating sources of sensor networks in unknown velocity mining system. IEEE Access 5:11337–11351. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2710142
Dong L, Zou W, Li X et al (2019a) Collaborative localization method using analytical and iterative solutions for microseismic/acoustic emission sources in the rockmass structure for underground mining. Eng Fract Mech 210:95–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.01.032
Dong L, Zou W, Sun D et al (2019b) Some developments and new insights for microseismic/acoustic emission source localization. Shock Vib 2019:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9732606
Fang W, Liu L, Yang J, Shui A (2016) A non-iterative AE source localization algorithm with unknown velocity. J Logist Eng Univ 32:1–7
Friedlander B (1987) A passive localization algorithm and its accuracy analysis. IEEE J Ocean Eng 12:234–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.1987.1145216
Ge M (2003) Analysis of source location algorithms, part i: overview and non-iterative methods. J Acoustic Emission 21(1):14–28
Hu J, Pan H, Liu H et al (2023) Response of acoustic emission and vibration monitoring data during rock block collapse in the tunnel: Small- and large-scale experiments study. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 137:105121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105121
Leighton F, Blake W (1970) Rock Noise Source Location Techniques. Bureau of Mines, Washington, D. C.
Leighton F, Duvall WI (1972) Least squares method for improving rock noise source location techniques. Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C. (USA)
Li Y, Arce GR (2004) A maximum likelihood approach to least absolute deviation regression. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2004:948982. https://doi.org/10.1155/S1110865704401139
Li X, Dong L (2014) An efficient closed-form solution for acoustic emission source location in three-dimensional structures. AIP Adv 4:027110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866170
Li Q, Dong L, Li X et al (2011) Effects of sonic speed on location accuracy of acoustic emission source in rocks. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 21:2719–2726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61115-1
Liu K, Jin S, Rui Y et al (2022) Effect of lithology on mechanical and damage behaviors of concrete in concrete-rock combined specimen. Mathematics 10:727. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10050727
Prugger AF, Gendzwill DJ (1988) Microearthquake location: a nonlinear approach that makes use of a simplex stepping procedure. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78:799–815. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0780020799
Rui Y, Zhou Z, Cai X et al (2022a) A novel robust AE/MS source location method using optimized M-estimate consensus sample. Int J Min Sci Technol 32:779–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.06.003
Rui Y, Zhou Z, Cai X, Dong L (2022b) A novel robust method for acoustic emission source location using DBSCAN principle. Measurement 191:110812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110812
Rui Y, Zhou Z, Lu J et al (2022c) A novel AE source localization method using clustering detection to eliminate abnormal arrivals. Int J Min Sci Technol 32:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.11.004
Shanyavskiy A, Banov M (2020) Acoustic emission methods for lifetime estimations in aircraft structures. Theor Appl Fract Mech 109:102719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102719
Sharma A, Ray S, Iqbal MA (2023) Characterization of fracture development in geometrical similar ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) beams using acoustic emission (AE) technique. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.691
Zhao X, Li Y, Yuan R et al (2007) Study on crack dynamic propagation process of rock samples based on acoustic emission location. Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng XuebaoChinese J Rock Mech Eng 26:944–950
Zhou Z, Rui Y, Zhou J et al (2018) A new closed-form solution for acoustic emission source location in the presence of outliers. Appl Sci 8:949. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060949
Zhou Z, Lan R, Rui Y et al (2019) A new acoustic emission source location method using tri-variate kernel density estimator. IEEE Access 7:158379–158388. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950225
Zhou Z, Rui Y, Cai X et al (2020a) A weighted linear least squares location method of an acoustic emission source without measuring wave velocity. Sensors 20:3191. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113191
Zhou Z, Rui Y, Cai X et al (2020b) A closed-form method of acoustic emission (AE) source location for a velocity-free system using complete time difference of arrival. Sensors 20:3553. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20123553
Zhou Z, Lan R, Rui Y et al (2021a) A new algebraic solution for acoustic emission source localization without premeasuring wave velocity. Sensors 21:459. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020459
Zhou Z, Rui Y, Cai X, Lu J (2021b) Constrained total least squares method using TDOA measurements for jointly estimating acoustic emission source and wave velocity. Measurement 182:109758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109758
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results received funding from the National Key Research and Development Program (Fund for Young Scientists) under Grant Agreement No. 2021YFC2900400, National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Agreement No. 52104077.
Funding
The research leading to these results received funding from the National Key Research and Development Program (Fund for Young Scientists) under Grant Agreement No. 2021YFC2900400, National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Agreement No. 52104077.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation was performed by Jie Chen and Yuanyuan Pu. Data collection and analysis were performed by Jiongkun Chen and Yichao Rui. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jiongkun Chen, and all authors reviewed and edited on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Chen, J., Rui, Y. et al. Joint Inversion of AE/MS Sources and Velocity with Full Measurements and Residual Estimation. Rock Mech Rock Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03917-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03917-3