Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fracture Mechanism of Sandstone Under Triaxial Extension at Different Loading Rates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After excavation, the rock mass often fails in the state of triaxial extension. To explore the fracture mechanism of sandstone under triaxial extension at different loading rates, the triaxial extension tests under confining pressure of 10 MPa and 30 MPa with different loading rates (range from 1 × 10–4 to 1 mm/s) were carried out on sandstone. Scanning electron microscopy and 3D optical scanning were used to obtain fracture characteristics. The results show that failure strength and elastic modulus increase with the increasing loading rate. Based on the analysis of asperity height, slope angle, aspect direction, fractal dimension, and fracture pattern, the fracture mechanism of sandstone at different loading rates was obtained: at a lower loading rate, microcracks propagate along weak structures. Microcracks grow into tensile cracks under lower confining pressure; grow into shear cracks under higher confining pressure. At a higher loading rate, more grains are damaged. Microcracks grow into tensile cracks under lower confining pressure; microcracks grow into tensile–shear cracks under higher confining pressure.

Highlights

  • Triaxial extension tests at different loading rates were carried out on sandstone under confining pressure of 10 MPa and 30 MPa.

  • The fracture patterns at different loading rates were determined.

  • The 3D morphological characteristics of fracture surfaces were obtained by using 3D optical scanner, and asperity height, slope angle, aspect direction, and fractal dimension were calculated.

  • The influence of confining pressure and loading rate on fracture behavior was determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52074352)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanshuang Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, C., Tan, G., Lv, Z. et al. Fracture Mechanism of Sandstone Under Triaxial Extension at Different Loading Rates. Rock Mech Rock Eng 56, 3429–3450 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03246-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03246-x

Keywords

Navigation