Skip to main content
Log in

Machine Learning-Aided Prediction of the Mechanical Properties of Frozen Fractured Rocks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complexity of fracture geometries impedes reliable prediction of the mechanical properties of frozen fractured rocks. Here, we combine the experimental, numerical, and machine learning methods to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the Young’s modulus of frozen fractured rocks with five fracture geometries, including persistence factor of ice-filled fractures, spacing between the fractures, as well as inclination angle, thickness, and number of the fractures. We use the results of laboratory uniaxial compression tests to validate the numerical model and the results of two-dimensional particle flow code simulations to train the random forest (RF) models. Our study demonstrates reliable prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength and the Young’s modulus of frozen fractured rocks and compares the prediction performance with the Ramamurthy criterion. We also conduct a sensitivity analysis to reveal dominant geometries and obtain the simplified RF models with three fracture geometries (i.e., persistence factor, inclination angle, and fracture number) for similar prediction accuracy. We finally use additional experimental results to further test the reliability of the simplified RF models. The combined method can be further applied to study other mechanical properties of complex fractured rocks and is particularly suitable for the cases with limited and scattered data from the fractured rocks in experimental and field investigations.

Highlights

  • The experimental and numerical studies show how the complexity of fracture geometries influences the mechanical properties of frozen fractured rocks.

  • The combined experimental, numerical, and machine learning method is developed to predict the mechanical properties of frozen rocks with complex fracture geometries.

  • The sensitivity analysis is used to determine the dominant geometries to simplify the machine learning models for similar prediction accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arakawa M, Maeno N (1997) Mechanical strength of polycrystalline ice under uniaxial compression. Cold Reg Sci Technol 26(3):215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24(2):123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (2017) Classification and regression trees, 1st edn. Routledge, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung BKS, Langevin A, Delmaire H (1997) Coupling genetic algorithm with a grid search method to solve mixed integer nonlinear programming problems. Comput Math Appl 34(12):13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan K, Ji Y, Xu N, Wan Z, Wu W (2019) Excavation-induced fault instability: possible causes and implications for seismicity. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 92:103041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish AM, Zaretsky YK (1997) Ice strength as a function of hydrostatic pressure and temperature. CRREL Report, Cold Reg Res Eng Lab 97:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambino GF, Harrison JP (2017) Rock engineering design in frozen and thawing rock: current approaches and future directions. Procedia Eng 191:656–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber S, Haeberli W (2007) Permafrost in steep bedrock slopes and its temperature-related destabilization following climate change. Earth Surf, J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000547

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1979) Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 16(2):135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Itasca (2008) Particle flow code in two dimensions, 4.0 ed. Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis

  • Ivars MD, Pierce ME, Darcel C, Reyes-Montes J, Potyondy DO, Young PR, Cundall PA (2011) The synthetic rock mass approach for jointed rock mass modelling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(2):219–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger J (1960) Shear failure of anistropic rocks. Geol Mag 97(1):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Xu H, Zhao Z, Chen Z (2019) DEM modeling of interaction between the propagating fracture and multiple pre-existing cemented discontinuities in shale. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(6):1993–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Cai C (2019) Challenges and countermeasures for construction safety during the Sichuan-tibet railway project. Engineering 5(5):833–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad JS (1992) Strength of non-persistent rock joint. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana

  • Murton JB, Peterson R, Ozouf JC (2006) Bedrock fracture by ice segregation in cold regions. Science 314(5802):1127–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay E (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830

    Google Scholar 

  • Plug LJ, Werner BT (2001) Fracture networks in frozen ground. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 106(B5):8599–8613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potyondy DO (2007) Simulating stress corrosion with a bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(5):677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potyondy DO, Cundall PA (2004) A bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(8):1329–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prudencio M, Van Sint JM (2007) Strength and failure modes of rock mass models with non-persistent joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(6):890–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy T, Arora VK (1994) Strength predictions for jointed rocks in confined and unconfined states. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 31(1):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy T (1993) Strength and modulus response of anisotropic rocks. Comprehensive rock engineering: principles, practice and projects. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Tan H, Yang H, Chen S, Che Y, Chen J (2021) Fracture evolution and failure characteristics of sandstone under freeze-thaw cycling by computed tomography. Eng Geol 294:106370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z, Wang L, Zhou J, Wang C (2020) A new method for determining the hydraulic aperture of rough rock fractures using the support vector regression. Eng Geol 271:105618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao S, Tang X, Rutqvist J, Liu Q, Hu M (2021) The influence of stress anisotropy and stress shadow on frost cracking in rock. Comput Geotech 133:103967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walder JS, Hallet B (1985) A theoretical model of the fracture of rock during freezing. Geol Soc Am Bull 96(3):336–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Xu W, Xu R (2005) Slope stability evaluation using back propagation neural networks. Eng Geol 80(3):302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Wan W, Zhao Y (2020a) Prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks from simple index tests using a random forest predictive model. Comp Rend Méca 348(1):3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Feng W, Wang H, Li C, Hou Z (2020b) Rock bridge fracturing characteristics in granite induced by freeze-thaw and uniaxial deformation revealed by AE monitoring and post-test CT scanning. Cold Reg Sci Technol 177:103115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei M, Meng W, Dai F, Wu W (2022) Application of machine learning in predicting the rate-dependent compressive strength of rocks. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng L, Wu Z, Liu Q (2020) Dynamic mechanical properties of dry and water-saturated siltstones under sub-zero temperatures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(10):4381–4401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Zhang Y, Guo C, Yang Z, Tang J, Su F (2020) Landslide susceptibility assessment in mountainous area: a case study of Sichuan-Tibet railway. Chin Environ Earth Sci 79(6):157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Li X, Zhu L (2021) Fracture mechanism of rock collapse in the freeze–thaw zone of the eastern sichuan-tibet mountains under seasonal fluctuating combinations of water and heat. Nat Hazards 108(2):2309–2333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YL, Liu Q, Zhang CS, Liao J, Lin H, Wang YX (2021) Coupled seepage-damage effect in fractured rock masses: model development and a case study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 144:104822

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Research Foundation, Singapore, under its Virtual Singapore R&D Programme (Award No. NRF2019VSG-GMS-001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Wu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, W., Wu, W. Machine Learning-Aided Prediction of the Mechanical Properties of Frozen Fractured Rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 56, 261–273 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03091-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03091-4

Keywords

Navigation