Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Investigation of Squeezing in Underground Hard Rock Mines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Squeezing ground is one of the major challenges associated with deep, high-stress mining. In underground hard rock mines, these conditions are often a result of the presence of prominent structural features such as foliation inside the rock mass, which imposes mechanical anisotropy and leads to a nonlinear and anisotropic response of the rock mass to mining. Understanding this response of foliated rocks to various mining conditions is essential for managing the squeezing ground conditions. The complex behavior of a foliated rock mass requires the use of numerical methods to investigate the response of the rock mass to mining. Discontinuum numerical methods are frequently used to simulate anisotropic behavior, as they can explicitly represent the fractures. However, these methods present time and computational restrictions for large-scale models and complex mining geometries. These limitations can be overcome by employing anisotropic constitutive models in continuum numerical methods. This paper presents a methodology to investigate the failure mechanism of an intact foliated rock sample and foliated rock mass around an underground excavation utilizing the ubiquitous-joint model in continuum numerical methods. The paper also presents an approach that can be used to investigate the influence of varying interception angles between the foliation and excavation walls on the severity of squeezing ground conditions. The ubiquitous-joint model employed in FLAC3D accounts for the presence of weakness planes such as foliations in continuum material and can successfully reproduce the observed displacements and failure mechanism. The numerical modeling results were in good agreement with the closure strains recorded underground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aydan Ö, Akagi T, Kawamoto T (1993) The squeezing potential of rocks around tunnels; theory and prediction. Rock Mech Rock Eng 26:137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barla G (1995) Squeezing rocks in tunnels. ISRM News J 3(4):44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Barla G, Debernardi D, Sterpi D (2012) Time-dependent modeling of tunnels in squeezing conditions. Int J Geomech 12:697–710. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck DA, Kassbohm S, Putzar G 2010, Multi-scale simulation of ground support designs for extreme tunnel closure. In: Potvin Y (ed) Proceedings of the second international symposium on block and sublevel caving, australian centre for geomechanics, Perth, pp 441–453

  • Bewick RP (2008) Effects of anisotropic rock mass characteristics on excavation stability, MASc Thesis. Laurentian University. Sudbury, Canada

  • Board M, Chacon E, Varona P, Lorig L (1996) Comparative analysis of toppling behaviour at Chuquicamata open-pit mine, Chile. Trans Inst Min Metall Sect Min Ind 105:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark IH (2006) Simulation of rock mass strength using ubiquitous joints. In: May RH, Verona P (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international FLAC symposium on numerical modelling in Geomechanics – 2006, Minneapolis, Itasca, Paper No. 08–07

  • Goricki A, Button E, Schubert W, Pötsch M, Leitner R (2005) The influence of discontinuity orientation on the behaviour of tunnels. Felsbau 23:2–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjigeorgiou J, Karampinos E, Turcotte P, Mercier-Langevin F (2013) Assessment of the influence of drift orientation on observed levels of squeezing in hard rock mines. In: Potvin Y, Brady B (eds) Proceedings of the seventh international symposium on ground support in mining and underground construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp 109–117

  • Hoek E (2001) Big tunnels in bad rock. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:726–740. 20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu S-C, Chiang SS, Lai JR (2004) Failure mechanisms of tunnels in weak rock with interbedded structures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.12.024 (Proceedings of the ISRM SINOROCK 2004 symposium)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismael MA, Imam HF, El-Shayeb Y (2014) A simplified approach to directly consider intact rock anisotropy in Hoek–Brown failure criterion. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:486–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itasca Consulting Group Inc (2012) FLAC3D—Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (Version 5.0). Itasca, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Itasca Consulting Group Inc (2017) FLAC3D—Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (Version 6.0). Itasca, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Karampinos E (2016) Management of squeezing ground conditions in hard rock mines. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Toronto. Toronto, Canada

  • Karampinos E, Hadjigeorgiou J, Turcotte P, Drolet M-M, Mercier-Langevin F (2014) Empirical and numerical investigation on the behaviour of foliated rock masses under high stress conditions. In: Hudyma M, Potvin Y (eds) Proceedings of the seventh international conference on deep and high stress mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp 345–361

  • Karampinos E, Hadjigeorgiou J, Hazzard J, Turcotte P (2015) Discrete element modelling of the buckling phenomenon in deep hard rock mines. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolymbas D, Fellin W, Kirsch A (2006) Squeezing due to stress relaxation in foliated rock. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30:1357–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner R, Pötsch M, Schubert W (2006) Aspects on the numerical modelling of rock mass anisotropy in tunnelling. Felsbau 24:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Li H, Kato H, Mizuta Y (2003) Application of ubiquitous joint model in numerical modeling of hilltop mines in Japan. Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao Chinese J Rock Mech Eng 22:951–956

    Google Scholar 

  • Malan DF (2002) Manuel Rocha Medal recipient simulating the time-dependent behaviour of excavations in hard rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 35:225–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-002-0026-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellies G (2009) Two case studies of excavations in fractured rock. M.Sc. Thesis. Laval University. Quebec, Canada

  • Mercier-Langevin F, Hadjigeorgiou J (2011) Towards a better understanding of squeezing potential in hard rock mines. Min Technol 120(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1179/037178411X12942393517372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier-Langevin F, Turcotte P (2007) Evolution of ground support practices at Agnico-Eagle’s LaRonde Division—innovative solutions to high-stress yielding ground. In: Eberhardt E, Stead D, Morrison T (eds) Rock mechanics, meeting society’s challenges and demands. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 1497–1504

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Panigrahi DC, Behera PK, Sinha RK, Munshi B (2015) Geotechnical lab testing of drill core samples from RA UG mine, internal report HZL. Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad

    Google Scholar 

  • Potvin Y, Hadjigeorgiou J (2008) Ground support strategies to control large deformations in mining excavations. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 108:397–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocscience Inc (2008) Phase2—finite element analysis for excavations and slopes. Rocscience, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocscience Inc (2017) RocData—rock, soil and discontinuity strength analysis. Rocscience, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury BL, Sainsbury DP (2017) Practical use of the ubiquitous-joint constitutive model for the simulation of anisotropic rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:1507–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1177-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury B, Pierce M, Mas Ivars D (2008) Analysis of caving behaviour using a synthetic rock mass (SRM)—ubiquitous-joint rock mass (UJRM) modelling technique. In: Potvin Y, Carter J, Dyskin A, Jeffery R (eds) Proceedings of the 1st southern hemisphere international rock mechanics symposium, vol 1, pp 243–253. Perth, Australia, 2008

  • Sandy MP, Gibson W, Gaudreau D (2007) Canadian and Australian ground support practices in high deformation environments. Deep Min 7:297–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert W, Mendez JMD (2017) Influence of foliation orientation on tunnel behavior. Proc Eng 191:880–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szwedzicki T (2007) A hypothesis on modes of failure of rock samples tested in uniaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 40:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-006-0096-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakili A, Sandy M, Albrecht J (2012) Interpretation of nonlinear numerical models in geomechanics—a case study in the application of numerical modelling for raise bored shaft design in a highly stressed and foliated rock mass. In: Proceedings sixth international conference and exhibition on mass mining, Massmin 2012, 10–14 June 2012, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, The Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum

  • Vakili A, Albrecht J, Sandy M (2014) Rock strength anisotropy and its importance in underground geotechnical design. In: Proceedings AusRock 2014, second Australasian ground control in mining conference, 5–6 November 2010, pp 167–180, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2014

  • Vyazmensky A, Yadav P (2015) Ground control management plan Rampura Agucha underground project. Internal report. Hindustan Zinc Limited, Rajasthan

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Xu D, Elsworth D, Zhou W (2016) Distinct element modeling of strength variation in jointed rock masses under uniaxial compression. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour 2:11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-015-0018-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JM, Vakili A, Jakubowski M (2015) Rock strength anisotropy in high stress conditions: a case study for application to shaft stability assessments. Stud Geotech Mech. https://doi.org/10.1515/sgem-2015-0013

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav P, Panda A, Sonam M, Banerjee B, Parihar S, Paneri DC (2016) Influence of foliation on excavation stability at Rampura Agucha underground mine. In: Proceedings recent advances in rock engineering (RARE 2016). National Institute of Rock Mechanics. Bengaluru, India

  • Yao H, Jia S, Li H (2017) Experimental study on failure characteristics of schist under unloading condition. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0364-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Q, He Z (2011) The ubiquitous-joint model and its application in predicting the strength of stratified rock. In: Ge L, Zhang X, Gomes A, Wu J (eds) Instrumentation, testing, and modeling of soil and rock behavior, 2011. ASCE, Hunan, China, pp 115–122

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the senior management and the geotechnical department of Hindustan Zinc Limited. The authors also acknowledge the Itasca Consulting Group Inc. for providing FLAC3D through the Itasca education partnership program. The financial support from Laurentian University is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pranay Yadav.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, P., Sharan, S. Numerical Investigation of Squeezing in Underground Hard Rock Mines. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52, 1211–1229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1632-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1632-9

Keywords

Navigation