Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of Aseismic Fault-Slip in a Deep Hard Rock Mine Through Numerical Modelling: Case Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic moment is a predominantly utilized parameter for assessing fault-slip potential when the numerical modelling of fault-slip is carried out. However, relying on seismic moment as an indicator for fault-slip might lead to incorrect conclusions, as fault-slip can be inherently seismic or aseismic. The present study examines the behaviour of a fault in Copper Cliff Mine, Canada, with a 3D numerical model encompassing major geological structures in the area of interest. Three types of numerical analyses are conducted, namely elastic and elasto-plastic analyses in static conditions and elasto-plastic analysis in dynamic conditions. The static analyses show that the fault most likely had undergone shear failure at the pre-mining stage. It is then demonstrated that mining activities induce further shear movements along the fault plane as well as within the fault material, as the fault is composed of thick, severely fractured materials. Notwithstanding the results, no large seismic events with Mw > 0.1 were recorded within the fault from microseismic-monitoring systems between 2006 and 2014, implying that the shear movements are aseismic and static. Furthermore, microseismic database analysis using 350,000 events that took place between 2004 and 2014 indicates that the fault is not seismically active. It is found from the dynamic analysis that the maximum slip rate during fault-slip is not more than 0.3 m/s, even when the fault-slip is simulated with an instantaneous stress drop. This result substantiates the assumption that the fault is not seismically active and shear movements are dominantly aseismic. It is therefore suggested that other factors such as stress re-distribution induced by the aseismic slip be considered in order to assess damage that could be caused by the fault movements. The present study sheds light on the importance of distinguishing aseismic from seismic fault-slip for optimizing support systems in underground mines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABAQUS (2003) ABAQUS online documentation: Ver 6.4-1.: Dassault Systemes, France

  • Alber M, Fritschen R (2011) Rock mechanical analysis of a M1 = 4.0 seismic event induced by mining in the Saar District, Germany. Geophys J Int 186:359–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alber M, Fritschen R, Bischoff M, Meier T (2009) Rock mechanical investigations of seismic events in a deep longwall coal mine. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:408–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altindag R, Guney A (2010) Predicting the relatinsips between brittleness and mechanical properties (UCS, TS and SH) of rocks. Sci Res Essay 5:2107–2118

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandis S, Lumsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 20:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (1973) Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7:287–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewick RP, Valley B, Runnals S, Whitney J, Krynicki Y (2009) Global approach to managing deep mining hazard. In: The 3rd CANUS rock mechanics symposium, Toronto

  • Bieniawski ZT (ed) (1976) Rock mass classification in rock engineering. In: Exploration for rock engineering. Balkema, Cape Town

  • Blake W, Hedley DGF (2003) Rockbursts case studies from North America hard-rock mines. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Littleton

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann JR (1987) Separating shock wave and gas expansion breakage mechanism. In: 2nd international symposium on rock fragmentation by blasting

  • Cai M (2010) Practical estimates of tensile strength and Hoek–Brown strength parameter mi of brittle rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappa F, Rutqvist J (2011) Modeling of coupled deformation and permeability evolution during fault reactivation induced by deep underground injection of CO2. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5:336–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappa F, Rutqvist J (2012) Seismic rupture and ground accelerations induced by CO2 injection in the shallow crust. Geophys J Int 190:1784–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieterich JH (1979) Modeling of rock friction1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J Geophys Res 84:2161–2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieterich JH, Kilgore B (1996) Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction. In: Proceedings of the National academy of science, U.S.A., pp 3787–3794

  • ESG (2011) WaveVis. ESG solutions, Kingston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Cripps AC, Mustafaev I (2000) Introduction to contact mechanics. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibowicz SJ, Kijko A (1994) An introduction to mining seismology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedley DGF (1992) Rockburst handbook for ontario hard rock mines. Ontario Mining Association, North York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herget G (1987) Stress assumptions for underground excavations in the Canadian Shield. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 24:95–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (2007) Practical rock engineering, Rocscience. https://www.rocscience.com/documents/hoek/corner/Practical-Rock-Engineering-Full-Text.pdf

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion—2002 edition. In: NARMS-TAC conference, 2002 Toronto, pp 267–273

  • Hofmann GF, Scheepers LJ (2011) Simulating fault slip areas of mining induced seismic tremors using static boundary element numerical modelling. Min Technol 120:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudyma M, Beneteau DL (2012) Time—a key seismic source parameter. In: Hawkes C (ed) 21st Canadian rock mechanics symposium ROCKENG12—rock engineering for natural resources, 2012. The Canadian Rock Mechanics Association, pp 311–318

  • Ida Y (1972) Cohesive force across the tip of a longitudinal-shear crack and Griffith’s specific surface energy. J Geophys Res 77:3769–3778

    Google Scholar 

  • ITASCA (2009) FLAC3D—fast Lagrangian analysis of continua. 4.0 edn. Itasca Consulting Group Inc., USA

  • ITASCA Consulting Group I (2013). Kubrix Ver. 12. Itasca, Minneapolis

  • Kanamori H (2001) Energy budget of earthquakes and seismic efficiency. Int Geophys 76:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizurek G, Rudziński Ł, Plesiewicz B (2015) Mining induced seismic event on inactive fault. Acta Geophys 63:176–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockner DA, Byerlee JD, Kuksenko V, Ponomarev A, Sidrin A (1991) Quasi-static fault growth and shear fracture energy in granite. Nature 350:39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysmer J, Kuhlemeyer RL (1969) Finite dynamic model for infinite media. J Eng Mech 95:859–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2001) Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as Flysch. Bull Eng Geol Environ 60:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarr A (1991) Observations constraining near-source ground motion estimated from lacally recorded seismograms. J Geophys Res 96:16495–16508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarr A (1994) Some comparisons between mining-induced and laboratory earthquakes. PAGEOPH 142:467–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarr A (2002) Control of strong ground motion of minig-induced earthquakes by the strength of the seismogenic rock mass. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 102:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeel R & Associates (2015) Rhinoceros 3D, Version 5.0. Robert McNeel & Associates, Seattle, WA

  • Naoi M, Nakatani M, Otsuka K, Yabe Y, Kgarume T, Murakami O, Masakale T, Ribeiro L, Ward A, Moriya H, Kawataka H, Durrheim R, Ogasawara H (2015) Steady activity of microfractures on geological faults loaded by mining stress. Tectonophysics 649:100–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohnaka M, Akatsu M, Mochizuki H, Odedra A, Tagashira F, Yamamoto Y (1997) A constitutive law for the shaer failure of rock under lithospheric conditions. Tectonophysics 277:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo PG, Dieterich JH (1984) Effects of physical fault properties on frictional instabilities produced on simulated faults. J Geophys Res 89:5817–5827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortlepp WD (2000) Observation of mining-induced faults in an intact rock mass at depth. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:423–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortlepp WD, Stacey TR (1994) Rockburst mechanisms in tunnels and shafts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 9:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin Y, Jarufe J, Wesseloo J (2010) Interpretation of seismic data and numerical modelling of fault reactivation at El Teniente, Reservas Norte sector. Min Technol 119:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruina A (1983) Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J Geophys Res 88:10359–10370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist J, Cappa F, Mazzoldi A, Rinaldi A (2013) Geomechanical modeling of fault response and the potential for notable seismic events during underground CO2 injection. Energy Procedia 37:4774–4784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder JA (1988) Excess shear stress in the assessment of geologically hazardous situations. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 88:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainoki A, Mitri HS (2014a) Dynamic modelling of fault slip with Barton’s shear strength model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 67:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainoki A, Mitri HS (2014b) Evaluation of fault-slip potential due to shearing of fault asperities. Can Geotech J 52:1417–1425

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainoki A, Mitri HS (2015) Effect of slip-weakening distance on selected seismic source parameters of mining-induced fault-slip. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 73:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainoki A, Mitri HS (2016) Back analysis of fault-slip in burst prone environment. J Appl Geophys 134:159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainoki A, Mitri HS, Yao M, Chinnasane D (2016) Discontinuum modelling approach for stress analysis at a seismic source: case study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4749–4765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shnorhokian S, Mitri HS, Thibodeau D (2014) A methodology for calibrating numerical models with a heterogeneous rockmass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:353–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg J, Perman F, Quinteiro C, Malmgren L, Dahner-Lindkvist J, Boskovic M (2012) Numerical analysis of alternative mining sequences to minimise potential for fault slip rockbursting. Min Technol 121:226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelling PE, Godin L, McKinnon SD (2013) The role of geologic structure and stress in triggering remote seismicity in Creighton Mine, Sudbury, Canada. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 58:166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifu CI, Urbancic TI (1996) Fracture coalescence as a mechanism for earthquake: obsrevations based on mining induced microseismicity. Tectonophysics 261:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbancic TI, Trifu C-I (1998) Shear zone stress release heterogeneity associated with two mining-induced events of M 1.7 and 2.2. Tectonophysics 289:75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urpi L, Rinaldi A, Rutqvist J, Cappa F, Spiers C (2016) Dynamic simulation of CO2-injection-induced fault rupture with slip-rate dependent friction coefficient. Geomech Energy Environ 7:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gool B (2007) Effects of blasting on the stability of paste fill stopes at Cannington Mine. PhD, James Cook University

  • White BG, Whyatt JK (1999) Role of fault slip on mechanisms of rock burst damage, Lucky Friday Mine, Idaho, USA. In: 2nd southern african rock engineering symposium, Implementing Rock Engineering Knowledge. Johannesburg, S. Africa

  • Wyllie DC (2003) Foundations on rock: engineering practice, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Yabe Y, Nakatani M, Naoi M, Phillipp J, Janssen C, Watanabe T, Katsura T, Kawataka H, Georg D, Ogasawara H (2015) Nucleation process of an M2 earthquake in a deep gold mine in South Africa inferred from on-fault foreshock activity. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:5574–5594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan F, Prakash V (2008) Use of a modified torsional Kolsky bar to study frictional slip resistance in rock-analog materials at coseismic slip rates. Int J Solids Struct 45:4247–4263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Yang T, Yu Q, Xu T, Zhu W, Liu H, Zhou J, Zhao Y (2015) Microseimicity induced by fault activation during the fracture process of a crown pillar. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1673–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler M, Reiter K, Heidbach O, Zang A, Kwiatek G, Stromeyer D, Dahm T, Dresen G, Hofmann G (2015) Mining-induced stress transfer and its relation to a Mw 1.9 seismic event in an ultra-deep South African gold mine. Pure Appl Geophys 172:2557–2570

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by a grant by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) in partnership with Vale Ltd—Sudbury Operations, Canada, under the Collaborative Research and Development Program. The authors are grateful for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Sainoki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sainoki, A., Mitri, H.S. & Chinnasane, D. Characterization of Aseismic Fault-Slip in a Deep Hard Rock Mine Through Numerical Modelling: Case Study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50, 2709–2729 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1268-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1268-1

Keywords

Navigation