Abstract
Many QCD-based models predict changes in the structure of the bound nucleon in the nuclear medium. The changes of the nucleon wave function lead to changes in nucleon structure functions and electromagnetic form factors. While these in-medium form factors are not experimental observables, they provide a natural explanation of a variety of experimental results. I will review some of these findings and discuss upcoming experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I.C. Cloët, W. Bentz, A.W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 252301 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.252301
L.S. Celenza, A. Rosenthal, C.M. Shakin, Phys. Rev. C 31, 232 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.31.232
D.H. Lu, A.W. Thomas, K. Tsushima, A.G. Williams, K. Saito, Phys. Lett. B 417, 217 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01385-3
M.R. Frank, B.K. Jennings, G.A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 54, 920 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.54.920
U.T. Yakhshiev, U.G. Meissner, A. Wirzba, Eur. Phys. J. A 16, 569 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2002-10121-x
J.R. Smith, G.A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 70, 065205 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.065205
S. Kondratyuk, K. Kubodera, F. Myhrer, Phys. Rev. C 71, 028201 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.028201
T. Horikawa, W. Bentz, Nucl. Phys. A 762, 102 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.08.002
G. Ramalho, K. Tsushima, A.W. Thomas, J. Phys. G40, 015102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/40/1/015102
J.H. Jung, U. Yakhshiev, H.C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 93(5), 054016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.054016
S. Malace, D. Gaskell, D.W. Higinbotham, I. Cloet, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 23(08), 1430013 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301314300136
I.C. Cloet, W. Bentz, A.W. Thomas, Phys. Lett. B 642, 210 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2006.08.076
V. Sokhoyan, \(N^*\) photoexcitation results from Mainz. in Talk Presented at the 11th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons, NSTAR 2017, Columbia, SC, August 20–23 (2017)
C.F. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi, M. Vanderhaeghen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 694 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2007.05.001
D.H. Barkhuff et al., Phys. Lett. B 470, 39 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01294-0
B. Hu et al., Phys. Rev. C 73, 064004 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.064004
I. Yaron et al., Phys. Lett. B 769, 21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.034
D. Izraeli et al., Phys. Lett. B 781, 107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.063
S. Dieterich et al., Phys. Lett. B 500, 47 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00052-1
S. Strauch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 052301 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.052301
M. Paolone et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 072001 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.072001
D. Izraeli et al., Phys. Lett. B 781, 95 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.027
S. Malov et al., Phys. Rev. C 62, 057302 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.057302
C Ciofi degli Atti, L.L. Frankfurt, L.P. Kaptari, M.I. Strikman, Phys. Rev C76, 055206 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.055206
L.B. Weinstein, E. Piasetzky, D.W. Higinbotham, J. Gomez, O. Hen, R. Shneor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 052301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.052301
O. Hen, D.W. Higinbotham, G.A. Miller, E. Piasetzky, L.B. Weinstein, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22, 1330017 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301313300178
R. Schiavilla, O. Benhar, A. Kievsky, L.E. Marcucci, M. Viviani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 072303 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.072303
J.M. Udias, J.A. Caballero, E. Moya de Guerra, J.E. Amaro, T.W. Donnelly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5451 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5451
J.A. Caballero, T.W. Donnelly, E. Moya de Guerra, J.M. Udias, Nucl. Phys. A 632, 323 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00817-8
J.M. Udias, J.R. Vignote, Phys. Rev. C 62, 034302 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.034302
S. Strauch, S. Malace, M. Paolone, Fizika B 20, 149 (2011)
S.P. Malace et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 052501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.052501
Jefferson Lab Experiment E11-002, “Proton Recoil Polarization in the \(^4\)He\((e,e^{\prime }p)^3\)H, \(^2\)H\((e,e^{\prime }p)n\), and \(^1\)H\((e,e^{\prime }p)\) Reactions”, E. Brash, G. Huber, R. Ransome, and S. Strauch, spokespersons
I.C. Cloët, G.A. Miller, E. Piasetzky, G. Ron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 082301 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.082301
Letter of Intent to JLab PAC 35, “Neutron Properties in the Nuclear Medium Studied by Polarization Measurements”, R. Gilman, D.W. Higinbotham, J. Lichtenstadt, G. Ron, S. Strauch
K.W. McVoy, L. Van Hove, Phys. Rev. 125, 1034 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.125.1034
I.C. Cloët, W. Bentz, A.W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(3), 032701 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.032701
J. Morgenstern, Z.E. Meziani, Phys. Lett. B 515, 269 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00873-5
A. Lovato, S. Gandolfi, J. Carlson, S.C. Pieper, R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(8), 082501 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.082501
Jefferson Lab Experiment E05-110, “Precision Measurement of Longitudinal and Transverse Response Functions of Quasi-Elastic Electron Scattering in the Momentum Transfer Range \(0.55~\text{GeV}/c \le |\mathbf{q}| \le 0.9~ \text{ GeV }/c\)”, S. Choi, J.P. Chen, and Z.E. Meziani, spokespersons
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported in parts by the U.S. National Science Foundation: NSF PHY-1505615.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection “NSTAR 2017 – The International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strauch, S. Baryons in the Nuclear Medium. Few-Body Syst 59, 105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-018-1428-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-018-1428-1