Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive factors inhibiting recovery of the respiratory function after anatomical pulmonary resection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Some patients have worse actual observed postoperative (apo) respiratory function values than predicted postoperative (ppo) values. The present study therefore clarified the predictive factors that hinder the recovery of the postoperative respiratory function.

Methods

This study enrolled 255 patients who underwent anatomical pulmonary resection for lung cancer. A pulmonary function test (PFT) was carried out before surgery and at one, three, and six months after surgery. In each surgical procedures, the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ratio was calculated as the apo value divided by the ppo value. In addition, we investigated the predictive factors that inhibited postoperative respiratory function improvement in patients with an FEV1 ratio < 1.0 at 6 months after surgery.

Results

The FEV1 ratio gradually improved over time in all surgical procedures. However, 49 of 196 patients who underwent a PFT at 6 months after surgery had an FEV1 ratio < 1.0. In a multivariate analysis, right side, upper lobe, segmentectomy and pleurodesis for prolonged air leakage were independent significant predictors of a decreased FEV1 ratio (p = 0.003, 0.006, 0.001, and 0.009, respectively).

Conclusion

Pleurodesis was the only controllable factor that might help preserve the postoperative respiratory function. Thus, the intraoperative management of air leakage is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to the privacy of individuals that participated in the study.

Abbreviations

PFT:

Pulmonary function test

FEV1:

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

VC:

Vital capacity

DLCO:

Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide

ppo:

Predicted postoperative

apo:

Actual observed postoperative

References

  1. Sarna L, Evangelista L, Tashkin D, Padilla G, Holmes C, Brecht ML, et al. Impact of respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function on quality of life of long-term survivors of non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2004;125(2):439–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pierce RJ, Copland JM, Sharpe K, Barter CE. Preoperative risk evaluation for lung cancer resection: predicted postoperative product as a predictor of surgical mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150:947–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miyazaki T, Callister MEJ, Franks K, Dinesh P, Nagayasu T, Brunelli A. Minute ventilation-to-carbon dioxide slope is associated with postoperative survival after anatomical lung resection. Lung Cancer. 2018;125:218–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, DeCamp MM, Sugarbaker DJ. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest. 1994;105:753–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang JS. Relationship of carbon monoxide pulmonary diffusing capacity to postoperative cardiopulmonary complications in patients undergoing pneumonectomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2003;19:437–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier JP, Varela G, et al. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). Eur Respir J. 2009;34:17–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Korst RJ, Ginsberg RJ, Ailawadi M, Bains MS, Downey RJ Jr, Rusch VW, et al. Lobectomy improves ventilatory function in selected patients with severe COPD. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:898–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueda K, Murakami J, Sano F, Hayashi M, Kobayashi T, Kunihiro Y, et al. Assessment of volume reduction effect after lung lobectomy for cancer. J Surg Res. 2015;197:176–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunelli A, Refai MA, Salati M, Sabbatini A, Morgan-Hughes NJ, Rocco G. Carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity improves risk stratification in patients without airflow limitation: evidence for systematic measurement before lung resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:567–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferguson MK, Vigneswaran WT. Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity after lung resection in patients without obstructive lung disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1158–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yokoba M, Ichikawa T, Harada S, Naito M, Sato Y, Katagiri M. Postoperative pulmonary function changes according to the resected lobe: a 1-year follow-up study of lobectomized patients. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(12):6891–902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Takamochi K, Imashimizu K, Fukui M, Maeyashiki T, Suzuki M, Ueda T, et al. Utility of objective chest tube management after pulmonary resection using a digital drainage system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104:275–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fukui M, Takamochi K, Suzuki K, Ando K, Matsunaga T, Hattori A, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of corticosteroid use for acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia after pulmonary resection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;69:472–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brunelli A, Refai M, Salati M, Xiume F, Sabbatini A. Predicted versus observed FEV1 and DLCO after major lung resection: a prospective evaluation at different postoperative periods. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1134–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nomori H, Shiraishi A, Cong Y, Sugimura H, Mishima S. Differences in postoperative changes in pulmonary functions following segmentectomy compared with lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53:640–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Okada M, Koike T, Higashiyama M, Yamato Y, Kodama K, Tsubota N. Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:769–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ueda K, Tanaka T, Hayashi M, Li TS, Tanaka N, Hamano K. Computed tomography-defined functional lung volume after segmentectomy versus lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:1433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deng B, Cassivi SD, de Andrade M, Nichols FC, Trastek VF, Wang Y, et al. Clinical outcomes and changes in lung function after segmentectomy versus lobectomy for lung cancer cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1186–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshimoto K, Nomori H, Mori T, Ohba Y, Shiraishi K, Tashiro K, et al. Postoperative change in pulmonary function of the ipsilateral preserved lung after segmentectomy versus lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:36–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamagishi H, Chen-Yoshikawa TF, Oguma T, Hirai T, Date H. Morphological and functional reserves of the right middle lobe: radiological analysis of changes after right lower lobectomy in healthy individuals. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;162:1417–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Irani B, Miller JE, Linberg E, Attar S. Use of radiopaque markings on middle lobe (or lingula) following upper resectional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1968;5:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maeyashiki T, Takamochi K, Matsunaga T, Oh S, Suzuki K. Negative impact of chemical pleurodesis on postoperative pulmonary function for managing prolonged air leakage after segmentectomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;69:707–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan, and the Smoking Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyasu Ueno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ueno, H., Takamochi, K., Hirayama, S. et al. Predictive factors inhibiting recovery of the respiratory function after anatomical pulmonary resection. Surg Today 53, 1081–1088 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02666-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02666-0

Keywords

Navigation