Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The clinical management of peripancreatic fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Peripancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is a frequent radiological finding on postoperative computed tomography (CT) after distal pancreatectomy (DP). We evaluated the risk factors for drainage of PFC after DP to clarify the optimal management of PFC.

Methods

This study included 85 patients who underwent elective DP between January 2010 and December 2020. PFC was defined as an area of fluid located at the pancreatic resection margin on postoperative routine CT on approximately postoperative day 7 (first CT). We retrospectively investigated the relationship between clinical variables, including CT findings and PFC drainage.

Results

Drainage was performed in 19 patients (22.4%). Drainage for PFC was significantly associated with a longer postoperative hospital stay, higher PFC volume, presence of air bubbles, and higher white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of the first CT. According to the multivariate analyses, a PFC volume ≥ 60 mL and WBC count ≥ 12,400/μL on the day of the first CT were independent risk factors for PFC drainage after DP. The combination of these 2 factors showed 73.7% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity.

Conclusion

The PFC volume and WBC count at the first CT were significantly associated with PFC drainage and may help determine the appropriate treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hackert T, Werner J, Büchler MW. Postoperative pancreatic fistula. Surgeon. 2011;9:211–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K, Hinz U, Wagner M, Bachmann J, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;245:573–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shirai Y, Furukawa K, Ashida H, Gocho T, Onda S, Hamura R, et al. Endovascular micro-arterial stenting for arterial pseudoaneurysm after pancreatic surgery. Surg Today. 2021;2021(51):1232–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G, Crippa S, Butturini G, Salvia R, et al. Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:207–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, Ina S, Hirono S, Nishioka R, et al. Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tjaden C, Hinz U, Hassenpflug M, Fritz F, Fritz S, Grenacher L, et al. Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18:35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Allen BC, Barnhart H, Bashir M, Nieman C, Breault S, Jaffe TA. Diagnostic accuracy of intra-abdominal fluid collection characterization in the era of multidetector computed tomography. Am Surg. 2012;78:185–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Uchida Y, Masui T, Sato A, Nagai K, Anazawa T, Takaori K, et al. Computer tomographic assessment of postoperative peripancreatic collections after distal pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018;403:349–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery. 2003;133:521–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Minarich MJ, Schwarz RE. Simplicity and safety: minimized pancreatic fistula rate after distal pancreatectomy through pancreas stump sutured fish-mouth closure. Am Surg. 2018;84:1734–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161:584–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwon YM, Gerdes H, Schattner MA, Brown KT, Covey AM, Getrajdman GI, et al. Management of peripancreatic fluid collections following partial pancreatectomy: a comparison of percutaneous versus EUS-guided drainage. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2422–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cronin CG, Gervais DA, Castillo CF, Mueller PR, Arellano RS. Interventional radiology in the management of abdominal collections after distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Christein JD. EUS-guided therapy for management of peripancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy in 20 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:418–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Patil R, Ona MA, Papafragkakis C, Anand S, Duddempudi S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of AXIOS stent for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29:168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Song KB, Kwon J, Lee YJ, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Shin SH, et al. The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:3314–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sierzega M, Kulig P, Kolodziejczyk P, Kulig J. Natural history of intra-abdominal fluid collections following pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1406–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gnannt R, Fischer MA, Baechler T, Clavien PA, Karlo C, Seifert B, et al. Distinguishing infected from noninfected abdominal fluid collections after surgery: an imaging, clinical, and laboratory-based scoring system. Invest Radiol. 2015;50:17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Osakabe H, Nagakawa Y, Kozono S, Takishita C, Nakagawa N, Nishino H, et al. Causative bacteria associated with a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula infection after distal pancreatectomy. Surg Today. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02287-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshino J, Ban D, Ogura T, Ogawa K, Ono H, Mitsunori Y, et al. The clinical implications of peripancreatic fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg. 2019;43:2069–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fukami Y, Saito T, Osawa T, Hanazawa T, Kurahashi T, Kurahashi S, et al. Which is the best predictor of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: drain fluid concentration or total amount of amylase? Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;5:844–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsumoto I, Kamei K, Satoi S, Murase T, Matsumoto M, Kawaguchi K, et al. Efficacy of the slow firing method using a reinforced triple-row stapler for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Today. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02344-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 20K17665 (Dr. Yoshihiro Shirai).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihiro Shirai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsunematsu, M., Shirai, Y., Hamura, R. et al. The clinical management of peripancreatic fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy. Surg Today 52, 1524–1531 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02483-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02483-x

Keywords

Navigation