Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The expression of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the lavage of the dissected area of the lateral lymph nodes influences the lateral recurrence of lower rectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether or not migrating cancer cells are present on the surgical plane after lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for lower rectal cancer and related to lateral recurrence (LR), we evaluated the lavage of LLND areas by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to check the expression of CEA mRNA in the residual cancer cells.

Methods

Thirty patients who underwent curative LLND were enrolled. Lavage was collected after LLND and subjected to RT-PCR to detect CEA mRNA. The median follow-up to check for recurrence was 31.4 months.

Results

CEA mRNA was detected in 9 of the 46 dissected areas. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curves, the cut-off value of PCR was set at 0.025. This cut-off point classified five patients into the high-expression group for CEA mRNA. During follow-up, LR developed in 1 of 40 low-expression areas of CEA mRNA and 3 of 6 high-expression areas. The LR rate was higher in the high-expression group than in the low-expression group (p = 0.015). A multivariate analysis showed that the high expression of CEA mRNA was likely an independent prognostic factor of LR.

Conclusion

The expression of CEA mRNA in the lavage of LLND areas indicates the presence of residual cancer cells that cause LR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miles WE. The pathology of the spread of cancer of the rectum, and its bearing upon the surgery of the cancerous rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1931;52(350):1931–2359.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coller FA, Kay EB, MacIntyre RS. Regional lymphatic metastasis of carcinoma of the rectum. Surgery. 1940;8(2):294–311.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grinnell RS. The lymphatic and venous spread of carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1942;116(2):200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deddish MR. Abdominopelvic lymph-node dissection in cancer of the rectum and distal colon. Cancer. 1951;4(6):1364–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sauer I, Bacon HE. Influence of lateral spread of cancer of the rectum on radicability of operation and prognosis. Am J Surg. 1951;81(1):111–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilchrist RK, David VC. Lymphatic spread of carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1938;108(4):621.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ueno M, Oya M, Azekura K, Yamaguchi T, Muto T. Incidence and prognostic significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92(6):756–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koyama Y, Moriya Y, Hojo K. Effects of extended systematic lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum—significant improvement of survival rate and decrease of local recurrence. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1984;14(4):623–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Watanabe T, Muro K, Ajioka Y, Hashiguchi Y, Ito Y, Saito Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23(1):1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kusters M, van de Velde CJ, Beets-Tan RG, Akasu T, Fujita S, Yamamoto S, et al. Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a single-center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(2):289–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stearns MW Jr, Deddish MR. Five-year results of abdominopelvic lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1959;2(2):169–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heald R, Husband E, Ryall R. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T. Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181(4):335–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benson AIB, Venook A, Cederquist L, Chan E, Chen Y, Cooper H, et al. Colon cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(3):370–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):272–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murono K, Ishihara S, Kawai K, Kaneko M, Sasaki K, Otani K, et al. Significance of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in peritoneal lavage determined by transcription-reverse transcription concerted method in patients with low rectal cancer. Asian J Surg. 2018;41(4):321–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hara M, Nakanishi H, Jun Q, Kanemitsu Y, Ito S, Mochizuki Y, et al. Comparative analysis of intraperitoneal minimal free cancer cells between colorectal and gastric cancer patients using quantitative RT-PCR: possible reason for rare peritoneal recurrence in colorectal cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2007;24(3):179–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hara M, Hirai T, Nakanishi H, Kanemitsu Y, Komori K, Tatematsu M, et al. Isolated tumor cell in lateral lymph node has no influences on the prognosis of rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(8):911–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsumoto T, Ohue M, Sekimoto M, Yamamoto H, Ikeda M, Monden M. Feasibility of autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for advanced rectal cancer based on analysis of micrometastases. Br J Surg. 2005;92(11):1444–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S. Importance of extended lymphadenectomy with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. World J Surg. 1997;21(7):728–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Hase K. Prognostic determinants of patients with lateral nodal involvement by rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2001;234(2):190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Georgiou P, Tan E, Gouvas N, Antoniou A, Brown G, Nicholls RJ, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(11):1053–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hida J-I, Yasutomi M, Fujimoto K, Maruyama T, Okuno K, Shindo K. Does lateral lymph node dissection improve survival in rectal carcinoma? Examination of node metastases by the clearing method. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184(5):475–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hojo K, Sawada T, Moriya Y. An analysis of survival and voiding, sexual function after wide iliopelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the rectum, compared with conventional lymphadenectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32(2):128–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Ito S, Yamamura Y, Kanemitsu Y, Shimizu Y, et al. Quantitative detection of disseminated free cancer cells in peritoneal washes with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: a sensitive predictor of outcome for patients with gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2002;235(4):499–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sato H, Maeda K, Maruta M. Prognostic significance of lateral lymph node dissection in node positive low rectal carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(7):881–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Okamura R, Hida K, Hasegawa S, Sakai Y, Hamada M, Yasui M, et al. Impact of intraoperative blood loss on morbidity and survival after radical surgery for colorectal cancer patients aged 80 years or older. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:327–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Egenvall M, Morner M, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U. Degree of blood loss during surgery for rectal cancer: a population-based epidemiologic study of surgical complications and survival. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:696–702.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Morner M, Gunnarsson U, Jestin P, Egenvall M. Volume of blood loss during surgery for colon cancer is a risk determinant for future small bowel obstruction caused by recurrence—a population-based epidemiological study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400:599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suto T, Sato T, Iizawa H. Histopathological characteristics of lateral lymph nodes dictate local or distant metastasis and prognosis in low rectal cancer patients. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018;2(3):90–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Inoue Y, Saigusa S, Hiro J, Toiyama Y, Araki T, Tanaka K, et al. Clinical significance of enlarged lateral pelvic lymph nodes before and after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016;4(6):994–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Satoshi Osaga, who belongs to Department of Clinical Research Management Center, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, for his helpful discussion and comments on the manuscript. In the Cox regression analysis, he advised us to use the Firth method for correction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayasu Hara.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takasu, K., Hara, M., Yanagita, T. et al. The expression of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the lavage of the dissected area of the lateral lymph nodes influences the lateral recurrence of lower rectal cancer. Surg Today 52, 84–91 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02347-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02347-w

Keywords

Navigation