Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional outcome assessment of swallowing (FOAMS) scoring and videofluoroscopic evaluation of perioperative swallowing rehabilitation in radical esophagectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction following esophagectomy has been associated with the surgical disruption of muscle strength and flexibility of the oropharyngeal structures. We assessed the value of perioperative swallowing rehabilitation (SR) in patients who underwent radical esophagectomy.

Methods

We instituted routine perioperative SR for patients with esophageal cancer and retrospectively compared postoperative swallowing function between the patients who received (n = 12) vs. those who did not receive (n = 14) SR.

Results

The average duration of pre- and postoperative SR was 23.0 and 26.0 days, respectively. Preoperatively, the functional outcome assessment of the swallowing (FOAMS) score was 7 (full marks) in all 26 patients, whereas the average score at hospital discharge was 6.3 vs. 5.5 in the patients who received vs. those who did not receive SR, respectively (p = 0.049). Videofluoroscopic examination (n = 12) demonstrated that the maximum superior excursion of hyoid bone increased significantly with preoperative SR (p = 0.030), as well as postoperative SR (p = 0.046). However, perioperative SR did not reduce the incidence of postoperative aspiration pneumonia or the duration of hospital stay.

Conclusions

Swallowing function after radical esophagectomy was improved by perioperative SR; however, further investigations are needed to assess the clinical significance of SR in reducing surgical complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watanabe M, Baba Y, Nagai Y, Baba H. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review. Surg Today. 2013;43:237–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrera R, Shi W, Amar D, Thaler HT, Gabovich N, Bains MS, et al. Smoking and timing of cessation: impact on pulmonary complications after thoracotomy. Chest. 2005;127:1977–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Westwood K, Griffin M, Roberts K, Williams M, Yoong K, Digger T. Incentive spirometry decreases respiratory complications following major abdominal surgery. Surgeon. 2007;5:339–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakatsuchi T, Otani M, Osugi H, Ito Y, Koike T. The necessity of chest physical therapy for thoracoscopic oesophagectomy. J Int Med Res. 2005;33:434–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Akutsu Y, Matsubara H, Okazumi S, Shimada H, Shuto K, Shiratori T, et al. Impact of preoperative dental plaque culture for predicting postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients. Dig Surg. 2008;25:93–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koh P, Turnbull G, Attia E, LeBrun P, Casson AG. Functional assessment of the cervical esophagus after gastric transposition and cervical esophagogastrostomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:480–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kato H, Miyazaki T, Sakai M, Sano A, Tanaka N, Kimura H, et al. Videofluoroscopic evaluation in oropharyngeal swallowing after radical esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:4249–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Easterling CS, Bousamra M, Lang IM, Kern MK, Nitschke T, Bardan E, et al. Pharyngeal dysphagia in postesophagectomy patients: correlation with deglutitive biomechanics. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:989–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin RE, Letsos P, Taves DH, Inculet RI, Johnston H, Preiksaitis HG. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in esophageal cancer before and after transhiatal esophagectomy. Dysphagia. 2001;16:23–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lerut TE, van Lanschot JJ. Chronic symptoms after subtotal or partial oesophagectomy: Diagnosis and treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;18:901–15 (Review).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robbins J, Gangnon RE, Theis SM, Kays SA, Hewitt AL, Hind JA. The effects of lingual exercise on swallowing in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1483–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robbins J, Kays SA, Gangnon RE, Hind JA, Hewitt AL, Gentry LR, et al. The effects of lingual exercise in stroke patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:150–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraaijenga SA, van der Molen L, Jacobi I, Hamming-Vrieze O, Hilgers FJ, van den Brekel MW. Prospective clinical study on long-term swallowing function and voice quality in advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and preventive swallowing exercises. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3379-6 [Epub ahead of print].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazarus CL, Husaini H, Falciglia D, DeLacure M, Branski RC, Kraus D, et al. Effects of exercise on swallowing and tongue strength in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated with primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:523–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours, UICC International Union Against Cancer 2010. 7th ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 10th edn: part I. Esophagus. 2009;6:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, tenth edition: parts II and III. Esophagus. 2009;6:71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujiu M. Effect of a tongue-holding maneuver on posterior pharyngeal wall movement during deglutition. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1996;5:23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Salman RA, Webster KT. Swallowing and speech therapy after definitive treatment for laryngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2002;35:1115–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaker R, Li Q, Ren J, Townsend WF, Dodds WJ, Martin BJ, et al. Coordination of deglutition and phases of respiration: effect of aging, tachypnea, bolus volume, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:750–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shaker R, Easterling C, Kern M, Nitschke T, Massey B, Daniels S, et al. Rehabilitation of swallowing by exercise in tube-fed patients with pharyngeal dysphagia secondary to abnormal UES opening. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1314–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Easterling C, Grande B. Dysphagia network pilot project: functional outcome assessment measure of swallowing, Wisconsin Speech Language Pathology and Audiology Association Convention Brief 1, 1999.

  24. Logemann JA. Manual for the Videofluorographic Study of Swallowing. 2nd ed. Austin: PROED; 1993. pp. 73–111.

  25. Lindbichler F, Raith J. Diagnosis of lateral hypopharyngeal pouches: a comparative study of videofluorography and pseudovalsalva maneuver in double contrast pharyngography. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:113–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gray C, Sivaloganathan S, Simpkins KC. Aspiration of high-density barium contrast medium causing acute pulmonary inflammation-report of two fatal cases in elderly women with disordered swallowing. Clin Radiol. 1989;40:397–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McAlister WH, Askin FB. The effect of some contrast agents in the lung: an experimental study in the rat and dog. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140:245–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Surgical Nursing Team at Toyama University Hospital for instructing and supporting the patients: Ms. M. Nagaki, Ms. J Matsushima, Ms. K Jozuka, and Ms. M Matsuda. We also thank Ms. Keiko Yago of the Dietary and Nutrition Service at Toyama University Hospital for preparing the Iopamidol Jelly. This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) MEXT KAKENHI Grant Number 23591920.

Conflict of interest

We declare no conflicts of interest relating to this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyuki Okumura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okumura, T., Shimada, Y., Watanabe, T. et al. Functional outcome assessment of swallowing (FOAMS) scoring and videofluoroscopic evaluation of perioperative swallowing rehabilitation in radical esophagectomy. Surg Today 46, 543–551 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1203-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1203-6

Keywords

Navigation