Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors for a persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the natural course of type 2 endoleaks (T2Es) and to identify the risk factors associated with a persistent T2E after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Methods

The medical records of patients who underwent EVAR for the treatment of an atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysm between October 2006 and December 2011 at our institute were reviewed. T2Es were diagnosed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography within 4 weeks of EVAR, and patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months. In cases where a T2E was detected, the blood vessels responsible for the T2E were identified and statistically analyzed for their association with a persistent T2E.

Results

We identified T2Es in 111 of 469 patients within 4 weeks of undergoing EVAR. During the follow-up, 41 patients (36.9 %) showed spontaneous resolution of their T2E. The percentage of patients with a T2E was 75.4, 69.2 and 58.0 % at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. T2E caused by defects in multiple vessels and T2E associated with the fourth lumbar artery were identified as risk factors associated with a persistent T2E in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, T2E caused by multiple vessels was identified as the only independent risk factor for a persistent T2E.

Conclusions

We identified T2E caused by multiple vessel failure as an independent risk factor for persistent T2E.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El Batti S, Cochennec Frédéric, Roudot-Thoraval Françoise, Becquemin Jean-Pierre. Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm are not always a benign condition. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:1291–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nolz R, Teufelsbauer H, Asenbaum U, Beitzke D, Funovics M, Wibmer A, et al. Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: fate of the aneurysm sac and neck changes during long-term follow-up. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19:193–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones JE, Atkins MD, Brewster DC, Chung TK, Kwolek CJ, LaMuraglia GM, et al. Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinmetz E, Rubin BG, Sanchez LA, Choi ET, Geraghty PJ, Baty J, et al. TypeIIendoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:306–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Timaran CH, Ohki T, Rhee SJ, Veith FJ, Gargiulo NJ III, Toriumi H, et al. Predicting aneurysm enlargement in patients with persistent type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1157–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kodama A, Narita H, Kobayashi M, Yamamoto K, Komori K, et al. Usefulness of POSSUM physiological score for the estimation of morbidity and mortality risk after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Japan. Circ J. 2011;75:550–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schermerhorn ML, O’Malley AJ, Jhaveri A, Cotterill P, Pomposelli F, Landon BE. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:464–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P, Becquemin JP, van Marrewijk C, Laheij RJF, for the EUROSTAR Collaborators. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:739–49.

  9. Silverberg D, Baril DT, Ellozy SH, Carroccio A, Greyrose SE, Lookstein RA, et al. An 8-year experience with type II endoleaks: natural history suggests selective intervention is a safe approach. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:453–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tuerff SN, Rockman CB, Lamparello PJ, Adelman MA, Jacobowitz GR, et al. Are typeII(branch vessel) endoleaks really benign? Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16:50–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abularrage CJ, Crawford RS, Conrad MF, Lee H, Kwolek CJ, Brewster DC, et al. Preoperative variables predict persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marchiori A, Ristow A, Guimaraes M, Scho¨nholz C, Uflacker R. Predictive factors for the development of type ii endoleaks. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18:299–305.

  13. AbuRahma AF, Mousa AY, Campbell JE, Stone PA, Hass SM, Nanjundappa A, et al. The relationship of preoperative thrombus load and location to the development of type II endoleak and sac regression. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1534–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bobadilla JL, Hoch JR, Leverson GE, Tefera G. The effect of warfarin therapy on endoleak development after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of the abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:267–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beeman BR, Murtha Kathy, Doerr K, McAfee-Bennett S, Dougherty MJ, Calligaro KD. Duplex ultrasound factors predicting persistent type II endoleak and increasing AAA sac diameter after EVAR. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1147–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arko FR, Rubin GD, Johnson BL, Hill BB, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK. Type-II endoleaks following endovascular aaa repair: preoperative predictors and long-term effects. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8:503–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koyanagi T, Kawaharada N, Kurimoto Y, Ito T, Baba T, Nakamura M, et al. Examination of intercostal arteries with transthoracic Doppler sonography. Echocardiography. 2010;27:17–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kasirajan K, Matteson B, Marek JM, Langsfeld M. Technique and results of transfemoral superselective coil embolization of type II lumbar endoleak. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:61–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abularrage CJ, Patel VI, Conrad MF, Schneider EB, Cambria RP, Kwolek CJ. Improved results using Onyx glue for the treatment of persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:630–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Solis MM, Ayerdi J, Babcock GA, Parra JR, McLafferty RB, Gruneiro LA, et al. Mechanism of failure in the treatment of type II endoleak with percutaneous coil embolization. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:485–91.

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiro Ito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maeda, T., Ito, T., Kurimoto, Y. et al. Risk factors for a persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Surg Today 45, 1373–1377 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1070-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1070-6

Keywords

Navigation