Skip to main content
Log in

Improved technology satisfaction and sleep quality with Medtronic MiniMed® Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop delivery compared to predictive low glucose suspend in people with Type 1 Diabetes in a randomized crossover trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Automated insulin delivery aims to lower treatment burden and improve quality of life as well as glycemic outcomes.

Methods

We present sub-study data from a dual-center, randomized, open-label, two-sequence crossover study in automated insulin delivery naïve users, comparing Medtronic MiniMed® Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL) to Sensor Augmented Pump therapy with Predictive Low Glucose Management (SAP + PLGM). At the end of each 4-week intervention, impacts on quality of life, sleep and treatment satisfaction were compared using seven age-appropriate validated questionnaires given to patients or caregivers.

Results

59/60 people completed the study (mean age 23.3 ± 14.4yrs). Statistically significant differences favoring AHCL were demonstrated in several scales (data shown as mean ± SE). In adults (≥ 18yrs), technology satisfaction favored AHCL over PLGM as shown by a higher score in the DTSQs during AHCL (n = 28) vs SAP + PLGM (n = 29) (30.9 ± 0.7 vs 27.9 ± 0.7, p = 0.004) and DTSQc AHCL (n = 29) vs SAP + PLGM (n = 30) (11.7 ± 0.9 vs 9.2 ± 0.8, p = 0.032). Adolescents (aged 13–17yrs) also showed a higher DTSQc score during AHCL (n = 16) versus SAP + PLGM (n = 15) (14.8 ± 0.7 vs 12.1 ± 0.8, p = 0.024). The DTQ “change” score (n = 59) favored AHCL over SAP + PLGM (3.5 ± 0.0 vs 3.3 ± 0.0, p < 0.001). PSQI was completed in those > 16 years (n = 36) and demonstrated improved sleep quality during AHCL vs SAP + PLGM (4.8 ± 0.3 vs 5.7 ± 0.3, p = 0.048) with a total score > 5 indicating poor quality sleep.

Conclusion

These data suggest that AHCL compared to SAP + PLGM mode has the potential to increase treatment satisfaction and improve subjective sleep quality in adolescents and adults with T1D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

De-identified data are available from the authors on request.

Abbreviations

AHCL:

Advanced hybrid closed-loop

SAP + PLGM:

Sensor augmented pump therapy with predictive low glucose management

DTSQs and DTSQc:

Diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire status and change

DTQ:

Diabetes technology questionnaire

PSQI:

Pittsburgh sleep quality index

WHO-5:

World health organization-five well-being index

HFS-II:

Hypoglycemic fear survey

HCS:

Hypoglycemia confidence scale

AID:

Automated insulin delivery

HCL:

Hybrid closed-loop

CGM:

Continuous glucose monitor

References

  1. Bekiari E, Kitsios K, Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Athanasiadou E, Karagiannis T et al (2018) Artificial pancreas treatment for outpatients with Type 1 Diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 361:k1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Collyns OJ, Meier RA, Betts ZL, Chan DSH, Frampton C, Frewen CM et al (2021) Improved glycemic outcomes with medtronic minimed Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop delivery: results from a randomized crossover trial comparing automated insulin delivery with predictive low glucose suspend in people with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 44(4):969–975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergenstal RM, Nimri R, Beck RW, Criego A, Laffel L, Schatz D et al (2021) A comparison of two hybrid closed-loop systems in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (FLAIR): a multicentre, randomised, crossover trial. Lancet 397(10270):208–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Breton MD, Kanapka LG, Beck RW, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Cengiz E et al (2020) A randomized trial of closed-loop control in children with Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 383(9):836–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanapka LG, Wadwa RP, Breton MD, Ruedy KJ, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP et al (2021) Extended use of the control-IQ closed-loop control system in children with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 44(2):473–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Petrovski G, Al Khalaf F, Campbell J, Umer F, Almajaly D, Hamdan M et al (2021) One-year experience of hybrid closed-loop system in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes previously treated with multiple daily injections: drivers to successful outcomes. Acta Diabetol 58(2):207–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McAuley SA, Lee MH, Paldus B, Vogrin S, de Bock MI, Abraham MB et al (2020) Six months of hybrid closed-loop versus manual insulin delivery with fingerprick blood glucose monitoring in adults with Type 1 Diabetes: a randomized. Control Trial Diabetes Care 43(12):3024–3033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horowitz ME, Kaye WA, Pepper GM, Reynolds KE, Patel SR, Knudson KC et al (2021) An analysis of Medtronic MiniMed 670G insulin pump use in clinical practice and the impact on glycemic control, quality of life, and compliance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 177:108876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrington C (2018) Psychosocial impacts of hybrid closed-loop systems in the management of diabetes: a review. Diabet Med 35(4):436–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Munoz-Velandia O, Guyatt G, Devji T, Zhang Y, Li SA, Alexander PE et al (2019) Patient values and preferences regarding continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and artificial pancreas in adults with Type 1 Diabetes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative data. Diabetes Technol Ther 21(4):183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Messer LH, Berget C, Vigers T, Pyle L, Geno C, Wadwa RP et al (2020) Real world hybrid closed-loop discontinuation: Predictors and perceptions of youth discontinuing the 670G system in the first 6 months. Pediatr Diabetes 21(2):319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lal RA, Basina M, Maahs DM, Hood K, Buckingham B, Wilson DM (2019) One year clinical experience of the first commercial hybrid closed-loop system. Diabetes Care 42(12):2190–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Russell SJ, Beck RW (2016) Design considerations for artificial pancreas pivotal studies. Diabetes Care 39(7):1161–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Battelino T, Nimri R, Dovc K, Phillip M, Bratina N (2017) Prevention of hypoglycemia with predictive low glucose insulin suspension in children with Type 1 Diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 40(6):764–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley C (1994) The diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ). In: Bradley C (ed) Handbook of psychology and diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. Harwood Academic Publishers, Switzerland, pp 111–132

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wysocki T, Reeves G, Kummer M, Ross J, Yu M (2015) Psychometric validation of the Diabetes technology questionnaire. Diabetes 64:A633-A

    Google Scholar 

  17. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ (1989) The pittsburgh sleep quality index—a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiat Res 28(2):193–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raniti MB, Waloszek JM, Schwartz O, Allen NB (2018) Trinder J (2018) Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in community-based adolescents. Sleep 41(6):zsy066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Topp CW, Ostergaard SD, Sondergaard S, Bech P (2015) The WHO-5 well-being index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom 84(3):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonder-Frederick LA, Schmidt KM, Vajda KA, Greear ML, Singh H, Shepard JA et al (2011) Psychometric properties of the hypoglycemia fear survey-II for adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 34(4):801–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hessler D, Edelman SV (2017) Investigating hypoglycemic confidence in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol The 19(2):131–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beato-Vibora PI, Gallego-Gamero F, Lazaro-Martin L, Romero-Perez MDM, Arroyo-Diez FJ (2020) Prospective analysis of the impact of commercialized hybrid closed-loop system on glycemic control, glycemic variability, and patient-related outcomes in children and adults: a focus on superiority over predictive low-glucose suspend technology. Diabetes Technol Ther 22(12):912–919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinsker JE, Muller L, Constantin A, Leas S, Manning M, McElwee Malloy M et al (2021) Real-world patient-reported outcomes and glycemic results with initiation of control-IQ technology. Diabetes Technol Ther 23(2):120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barnard KD, Wysocki T, Ully V, Mader JK, Pieber TR, Thabit H et al (2017) Closing the loop in adults, children and adolescents with suboptimally controlled Type 1 Diabetes under free living conditions: a psychosocial substudy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11(6):1080–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kropff J, DeJong J, Del Favero S, Place J, Messori M, Coestier B et al (2017) Psychological outcomes of evening and night closed-loop insulin delivery under free living conditions in people with Type 1 Diabetes: a 2-month randomized crossover trial. Diabet Med 34(2):262–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bergenstal RM, Garg S, Weinzimer SA, Buckingham BA, Bode BW, Tamborlane WV et al (2016) Safety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with Type 1 Diabetes. JAMA 316(13):1407–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Boucher SE, Gray AR, Wiltshire EJ, de Bock MI, Galland BC, Tomlinson PA et al (2020) Effect of 6 months of flash glucose monitoring in youth with Type 1 Diabetes and high-risk glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 43(10):2388–2395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, Clements MA, Rickels MR, DiMeglio LA et al (2019) State of Type 1 Diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016–2018. Diabetes Technol Ther 21(2):66–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Macaulay GC, Boucher SE, Yogarajah A, Galland BC, Wheeler BJ (2020) Sleep and night-time caregiving in parents of children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes mellitus—a qualitative study. Behav Sleep Med 18(5):622–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Macaulay GC, Galland BC, Boucher SE, Wiltshire EJ, Haszard JJ, Campbell AJ et al (2020) Impact of Type 1 Diabetes mellitus, glucose levels, and glycemic control on sleep in children and adolescents: a case-control study. Sleep 43(2):zsz226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cobry EC, Hamburger E, Jaser SS (2020) Impact of the hybrid closed-loop system on sleep and quality of life in youth with Type 1 Diabetes and their parents. Diabetes Technol The 22(11):794–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bisio A, Gonder-Frederick L, McFadden R, Chernavvsky D, Voelmle M, Pajewski M et al (2021) The impact of a recently approved automated insulin delivery system on glycemic, sleep, and psychosocial outcomes in older adults with Type 1 Diabetes: a pilot study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296820986879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants and families for taking part in the study.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was financially supported by Medtronic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RAM, AR, BG, NK, JS, RAV, BJW, and MIdB designed the study protocol. OJC, RAM, ZLB, DSHC, CMF, NMH, SDJ, BJW, and MIdB were involved with recruitment and data collection. BJW, OJC, and MIdB wrote the manuscript. RAM edited the manuscript. CF conducted the statistical analyses. MIdB is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin I. de Bock.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

B.J.W. and M.I.d.B. are financially supported by Otago University. N.M.H. received honoraria from Sanofi. A.R., B.G., N.K., J.S., and R.A.V. are employees of Medtronic. M.I.d.B. received honoraria from Medtronic. B.J.W. and M.I.d.B have received research funding from Medtronic. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Ethics approval

This study was conducted in compliance with the International Organization for Standardization ISO14155: 2011, and conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Southern Health and Disability Ethics Committee and registered at ANZCTR (#12619000007134) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04073576).

Informed consent to participate and publish

Informed consent was obtained from all participants for inclusion in the study.

Additional information

Managed by Massimo Porta.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Benjamin J Wheeler and Olivia J Collyns : Joint-First authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wheeler, B.J., Collyns, O.J., Meier, R.A. et al. Improved technology satisfaction and sleep quality with Medtronic MiniMed® Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop delivery compared to predictive low glucose suspend in people with Type 1 Diabetes in a randomized crossover trial. Acta Diabetol 59, 31–37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-021-01789-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-021-01789-5

Keywords

Navigation