Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simultaneous vs staged bilateral hip arthroplasty: monocentric analysis of satisfaction rate and complications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Interest in bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been increasing over the past decade. This study aims to compare postoperative local and systemic complications, hospital readmissions, and satisfaction assessment in patients undergoing simultaneous versus staged bilateral THA.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted among patients who underwent simultaneous or staged bilateral THA between 2017 and 2020. Data on perioperative parameters, local and systemic complications, and 30-day hospital readmissions were collected. Patient satisfaction was assessed using Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). The comparison of continuous variables with normal distribution of variance was performed by ANOVA; for variables with abnormal distribution, the nonparametric test Mann–Whitney U was adopted. The distribution of dichotomous variables was analyzed by chi-square test, and statistical significance was calculated by Fisher exact test.

Results

The study included 199 patients, of whom 156 underwent staged and 43 simultaneous bilateral THA. A total of 44 patients developed complications (21 systemics, 12 locals, and 20 postoperative anemia). There were no significant differences regarding local (simultaneous 5% vs. staged 6%; p = 0.999) or systemic complications (simultaneous 14% vs. staged 10%; p = 0.408). Only the incidence of postoperative anemia was significantly higher in simultaneous group compared with staged group (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in FJS between the two groups (p = 0.258).

Conclusion

No differences in local or systemic complications nor readmission rates were observed following simultaneous or staged bilateral THA. Simultaneous bilateral THA is non-inferior to staged implants in terms of safety and patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico.

References

  1. Lorenze M, Huo MH, Zatorski LE, Keggi KJ (1998) A comparison of the cost effectiveness of one-stage versus two-stage bilateral total hip replacement. Orthopedics 21:1249–1252. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19981201-04

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaffe WL, Charnley J (1971) Bilateral charnley low-friction arthroplasty as a single operative procedure. a report of fifty cases. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 32:198–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Najfeld M, Kalteis T, Spiegler C et al (2021) The safety of bilateral simultaneous hip and knee arthroplasty versus staged arthroplasty in a high-volume center comparing blood loss, peri- and postoperative complications, and early functional outcome. J Clin Med 10:4507. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194507

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Papalia R, Campi S, Vorini F et al (2020) The role of physical activity and rehabilitation following hip and knee arthroplasty in the elderly. J Clin Med 9:1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal S, Gupta G, Sharma RK (2016) Comparison between single stage and two stage bilateral total hip replacement- our results and review of literature. Acta Orthop Belg 82:484–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miura N, Tagomori K, Ikutomo H et al (2018) Asymmetrical loading during sit-to-stand movement in patients 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 57:89–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zampogna B, Papalia GF, Parisi FR et al (2022) Early return to activity of daily living after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther. https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000221146116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pop T, Szymczyk D, Majewska J et al (2018) The assessment of static balance in patients after total hip replacement in the period of 2–3 years after surgery. BioMed Res Int 2018:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3707254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahern S, Ruseckaite R, Ackerman IN (2017) Collecting patient-reported outcome measures: brief communications. Intern Med J 47:1454–1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.13633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Papalia R, Zampogna B, Torre G et al (2021) Preoperative and perioperative predictors of length of hospital stay after primary total hip arthroplasty-our experience on 743 cases. J Clin Med 10:5053. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215053

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Park C-W, Lim S-J, Yoo I et al (2021) Effects of disusing closed suction drainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 16:e0247845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Temporiti F, Zanotti G, Furone R et al (2019) Functional and postural recovery after bilateral or unilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 48:205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Loppini M, Longo UG, Caldarella E et al (2017) Femur first surgical technique: a smart non-computer-based procedure to achieve the combined anteversion in primary total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:331. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1688-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM et al (2011) Updating and validating the charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 173:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS (2019) A review of ASA physical status—historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia 74:373–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS (2012) The “Forgotten Joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:430-436.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Romagnoli S, Zacchetti S, Perazzo P et al (2013) Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties do not lead to higher complication or allogeneic transfusion rates compared to unilateral procedures. Int Orthop 37:2125–2130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2015-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Houdek MT, Wyles CC, Watts CD et al (2017) Single-anesthetic versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. J Bone Jt Surg 99:48–54. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Micicoi G, De Dompsure RB, Micicoi L et al (2020) One-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty versus unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case-matched study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106:577–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Glait SA, Khatib ON, Bansal A et al (2015) Comparing the incidence and clinical data for simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total hip arthroplasty in New York state between 1990 and 2010. J Arthroplasty 30:1887–1891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Loppini M, Pisano A, Gandolfi CE et al (2021) Complications, readmission and reoperation rates in one-stage bilateral versus unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a high-volume single center case-control study. Sci Rep 11:6299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85839-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Loppini M, Cannata R, Pisano A et al (2021) Incidence and predictors of blood transfusions in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a single center prospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142:3549–3554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04255-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rasouli MR, Maltenfort MG, Ross D et al (2014) Perioperative morbidity and mortality following bilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Morcos MW, Hart A, Antoniou J et al (2018) No difference in major complication and readmission rates following simultaneous bilateral vs unilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:2541–2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stavrakis AI, SooHoo NF, Lieberman JR (2015) Bilateral total hip arthroplasty has similar complication rates to unilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30:1211–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshii H, Oinuma K, Tamaki T et al (2016) Comparison of patient satisfaction after unilateral or simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach: evaluation using the japanese orthopaedic association hip disease evaluation questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 21:332–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The authors declare they have no financial interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by B. Zampogna, G. F. Papalia, A. Laudisio, A. Berton, F. Vorini, E. Franceschetti, N. Papapietro, and R. Papalia. The first draft of the manuscript was written by B. Zampogna, G. F. Papalia, A. Laudisio, A. Zampoli, L. Buccolieri, and A. Ferrini, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Laudisio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zampogna, B., Papalia, G.F., Laudisio, A. et al. Simultaneous vs staged bilateral hip arthroplasty: monocentric analysis of satisfaction rate and complications. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03958-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03958-y

Keywords

Navigation