Skip to main content
Log in

Functional outcome and analysis of factors affecting health-related quality of life of surgically managed pelvic ring fractures: a cross-sectional study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Pelvic ring fractures, particularly those involving the posterior pelvis, pose significant challenges due to their inherent instability. The posterior pelvic ring is critical in providing structural support and stability to the pelvis. This study evaluates the functional outcomes and health-related Quality of life (HRQOL) of patients who underwent internal fixation for unstable pelvic fractures. Various factors influencing the outcomes are also investigated.

Material and Methods

A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with unstable sacral fractures treated with posterior tension band plate or sacroiliac plating with or without symphyseal plating between 2016 and 2020. Patient demographics, injury mechanisms, associated injuries, surgical details, complications, and return-to-work data were collected. HRQOL was assessed using specific pelvic fracture instruments and general HRQOL questionnaires. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with lower SF-12 and SF-36 scores

Results

The study included 54 patients, predominantly males (55.6%), aged 18–70 years, with high-energy trauma mechanisms, such as road traffic accidents and occupational injuries. The majority of patients had lateral compression pelvic fractures. Overall, the functional outcomes were favorable, with excellent or good outcomes observed in 86.1% of cases. Patients with associated injuries, such as abdominal, chest, or head injuries, were likelier to have lower SF-12 physical component scores. Sexual satisfaction scores remained stable for most patients post-surgery.

Discussion

This study highlights the favorable functional outcomes and HRQOL for patients undergoing fixation for unstable pelvic ring fractures. Younger, working-age males were the most commonly affected demographic. Associated injuries significantly affected physical HRQOL scores. Despite high-energy trauma, patients generally reported satisfactory sexual function post-surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khurana B, Sheehan SE, Sodickson AD, Weaver MJ (2014) Pelvic ring fractures: what the orthopaedic surgeon wants to know. Radiographics 34(5):1317–1333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tornetta P, Matta JM (1996) The outcome of operatively treated unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:186–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu Y, He Y, Li W, Yang Z, Peng R, Yu L (2020) Comparison of biomechanical performance of five different treatment approaches for fixing posterior pelvic ring injury. J Healthc Eng 2020:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mardanpour K, Rahbar M (2013) The outcome of surgically treated traumatic unstable pelvic fractures by open reduction and internal fixation. J Inj Violence Res 5(2):87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang R, Yin Y, Li S, Hou Z, Jin L, Zhang Y (2018) Percutaneous sacroiliac screw versus anterior plating for sacroiliac joint disruption: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg [Internet] 50:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kokubo Y, Oki H, Sugita D, Takeno K, Miyazaki T, Negoro K et al (2017) Functional outcome of patients with unstable pelvic ring fracture: comparison of short- and long-term prognostic factors. J Orthop Surg 25(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khaleel VM, Pushpasekaran N, Prabhu N, Pandiyan A, Koshy GM (2019) Posterior tension band plate osteosynthesis for unstable sacral fractures: a preliminary study. J Clin Orthop Trauma [Internet] 10:S106–S111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matta JM, Tornetta P (1996) Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krappinger D, Larndorfer R, Struve P, Rosenberger R, Arora R, Blauth M (2007) Minimally invasive transiliac plate osteosynthesis for type C injuries of the pelvic ring: a clinical and radiological follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 21(9):595–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cole J, Blum D, Ansel L (1996) Outcome after fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:160–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Borg T, Berg P, Fugl-Meyer K, Larsson S (2010) Health-related quality of life and life satisfaction in patients following surgically treated pelvic ring fractures. A prospective observational study with two years follow-up. Injury 41(4):400–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dienstknecht T, Pfeifer R, Horst K, Sellei RM, Berner A, Zelle BA et al (2013) The long-term clinical outcome after pelvic ring injuries. Bone Joint J 95:548–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prieto-Alhambra D, Avilés F, Judge A, Van Staa T, Nogués X, Arden N et al (2012) Burden of pelvis fracture: a population-based study of incidence, hospitalization and mortality. Osteoporos Int 23(12):2797–2803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Andrich S, Haastert B, Neuhaus E, Neidert K, Arend W, Ohmann C et al (2015) Epidemiology of pelvic fractures in Germany: considerably high incidence rates among older people. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0139078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MRW, Tzioupis C et al (2007) Prevalence of pelvic fractures, associated injuries, and mortality: the United Kingdom perspective. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 63(4):875e883

    Google Scholar 

  16. Palmcrantz J, Hardcastle TC, Naidoo SR, Muckart DJJ, Ahlm K, Eriksson A (2012) Pelvic fractures at a new level 1 trauma centre: who dies from pelvic trauma? The Inkosi Albert Luthuli central hospital experience. Orthop Surg 4(4):216e221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon Y, Ma D, Lee S, Oh J, Song H (2021) Posterior pelvic ring injury of straddle fractures: incidence, fixation methods, and clinical outcomes. Asian J Surg 44(1):59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harvey-Kelly KF, Kanakaris NK, Obakponovwe O, West RM, Giannoudis PV (2014) Quality of life and sexual function after traumatic pelvic fracture. J Orthop Trauma 28:28–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brouwers L, Lansink K, de Jongh M (2018) Quality of life after pelvic ring fractures: a cross-sectional study. Injury 49(4):812–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Odutola A, Sabri O, Halliday R, Chesser T, Ward A (2012) High rates of sexual and urinary dysfunction after surgically treated displaced pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(8):2173–2184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bott A, Nicol G, Odutola A, Halliday R, Acharya M, Ward A et al (2022) Long-term patients reported sexual and urological dysfunction in males after operatively treated pelvic ring injuries. Do generic outcome measures identify genitourinary health problems? Injury 53(6):2139–2144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author declares that they have no funding statement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the above-mentioned authors have made substantial contributions to all of the following: (1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, (3) final approval of the version to be submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandeep Kumar Yadav.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 53 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elhence, A., Netaji, J., Yadav, S.K. et al. Functional outcome and analysis of factors affecting health-related quality of life of surgically managed pelvic ring fractures: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03869-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03869-y

Keywords

Navigation