Skip to main content
Log in

Periprosthetic fracture following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: is a cemented stem protective?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) carry significant morbidity following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF). This study assessed fracture complications following arthroplasty for FNF and the effect of cement fixation of the femoral component on intraoperative and post-operative PFF.

Methods

Between February 2014 and September 2021, 740 patients with a FNF who underwent arthroplasty were analyzed for demographics, surgical management, use of cement for fixation of the femoral component, and subsequent PFF. Variables were compared with Mann–Whitney or Chi-square as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess independent risk factors associated with intraoperative or post-operative PFF.

Results

There were 163 THAs (41% cemented) and 577 HAs (95% cemented). There were 28 PFFs (3.8%): 18 post-operative and 10 intraoperative. Fewer post-operative PFFs occurred with cemented stems (1.63% vs. 6.30%, p = 0.002). Mean time from surgery to presentation with post-operative PFF was 14 months (0–45 months). Mean follow-up time was 10.3 months (range: 0–75.7 months). In multivariate regression, use of cement and THA was independently associated with decreased post-operative PFF (cement: OR 0.112, 95% CI 0.036–0.352, p < 0.001 and THA: OR 0.249, 95% CI 0.064–0.961, p = 0.044). More intraoperative fractures occurred during THA (3.68% vs. 0.69%, p = 0.004) and non-cemented procedures (5.51% vs. 0.49%, p < 0.001). In multivariate regression, use of cement was protective against intraoperative fracture (OR 0.100, CI 0.017–0.571, p = 0.010).

Conclusions

In patients with a FNF treated with arthroplasty, cementing the femoral component is associated with a lower risk of intraoperative and post-operative PFF. Choice of procedure may be based on patient factors and surgeon preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roche JJW, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG (2005) Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 331:1374. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38643.663843.55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Karademir G, Bilgin Y, Erşen A et al (2015) Hip fractures in patients older than 75 years old: retrospective analysis for prognostic factors. Int J Surg 24:101–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Mohrej OA, Alshaalan FN, Aldakhil SS, Rahman WA (2020) One-year mortality rates following fracture of the femoral neck treated with hip arthroplasty in an aging Saudi population: a trauma center experience. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 11:2151459320922473. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459320922473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Maceroli MA, Nikkel LE, Mahmood B, Elfar JC (2015) Operative mortality after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture and hospital volume. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 6:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458515600496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ju DG, Rajaee SS, Mirocha J et al (2017) Nationwide analysis of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a receding tide. J Bone Jt Surg 99:1932–1940. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Song JSA, Dillman D, Wilson D et al (2019) Higher periprosthetic fracture rate associated with use of modern uncemented stems compared to cemented stems in femoral neck fractures. HIP Int 29:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018772291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marsland D, Mears SC (2012) A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3:107–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458512462870

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen KK, Nayyar S, Davidovitch RI et al (2018) Cemented compared with uncemented femoral fixation in the arthroplasty treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 6:e6. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT et al (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Jt J 98:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (1999) The prevention of periprosthetic fractures in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 30:191–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70074-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stockton DJ, O’Hara LM, O’Hara NN et al (2019) High rate of reoperation and conversion to total hip arthroplasty after internal fixation of young femoral neck fractures: a population-based study of 796 patients. Acta Orthop 90:21–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1558380

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu X, Wang Y, Sun W, Tan M (2021) Cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res 33:2087–2111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01731-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kristensen TB, Dybvik E, Kristoffersen M et al (2020) Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture? data from the Norwegian hip fracture register. Clin Orthop 478:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Okike K, Chan PH, Prentice HA et al (2020) Association between uncemented versus cemented hemiarthroplasty and revision surgery among patients with hip fracture. JAMA 323:1077–1084. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1067

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernandez MA, Achten J, Parsons N et al (2022) Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fracture. N Engl J Med 386:521–530. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2108337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin FF, Chen YF, Chen B et al (2019) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e14634. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pivec R, Issa K, Kapadia BH et al (2015) Incidence and future projections of periprosthetic femoral fracture following primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of international registry data. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 25:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2015012625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guyen O (2019) Hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty in recent femoral neck fractures? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:S95–S101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Young PS, Patil S, Meek RMD (2018) Intraoperative femoral fractures: prevention is better than cure. Bone Jt Res 7:103–104. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0318.R1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. The HEALTH Investigators (2019) Total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. N Engl J Med 381:2199–2208. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1906190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chammout G, Kelly-Pettersson P, Hedbeck C-J et al (2019) HOPE-Trial: hemiarthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in octogenarians: a randomized controlled trial. JBJS Open Access 4:e0059. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00059

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ekhtiari S, Gormley J, Axelrod DE et al (2020) Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Jt Surg 102:1638–1645. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Y, Chen X, Zhang P, Jiang B (2020) Comparing total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture in the active elderly over 75 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. J Orthop Surg 15:215. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01725-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ricioli W, Queiroz MC, Guimarães RP et al (2015) Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study. Int Orthop 39:1939–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2961-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu B, Ma W, Li H et al (2019) Incidence, classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a single stem: a retrospective study. J Arthroplast 34:1400–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Berend KR, Lombardi AV (2010) Intraoperative femur fracture is associated with stem and instrument design in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 468:2377–2381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1314-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Siddiqi A, Springer BD, Chen AF, Piuzzi NS (2021) Diagnosis and management of intraoperative fractures in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 29:e497–e512. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim S-M, Han S-B, Rhyu KH et al (2018) Periprosthetic femoral fracture as cause of early revision after short stem hip arthroplasty—a multicentric analysis. Int Orthop 42:2069–2076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3930-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuo C-L, Tan SHS, Lee HC (2015) Intra-operative fractures in cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Hong Kong 23:218–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901502300222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barlas KJ, Ajmi QS, Bagga TK et al (2008) Association of intra-operative metaphyseal fractures with prosthesis size during hemiarthroplasty of the hip. J Orthop Surg Hong Kong 16:30–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900801600108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Haidukewych GJ, Stewart C (2011) Intraoperative fractures during total hip arthroplasty: see it before it sees you. Semin Arthroplast 22:95–97. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2011.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sterling RS (2011) Gender and race/ethnicity differences in hip fracture incidence, morbidity, mortality, and function. Clin Orthop 469:1913–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1736-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Farmer ME, White LR, Brody JA, Bailey KR (1984) Race and sex differences in hip fracture incidence. Am J Public Health 74:1374–1380. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.74.12.1374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. West BA, Bhat G, Stevens J, Bergen G (2015) Assistive device use and mobility-related factors among adults aged ≥ 65 years. J Saf Res 55:147–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2015.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Järvinen TLN, Sievänen H, Khan KM et al (2008) Shifting the focus in fracture prevention from osteoporosis to falls. BMJ 336:124–126. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39428.470752.AD

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Heini PF, Franz T, Fankhauser C et al (2004) Femoroplasty-augmentation of mechanical properties in the osteoporotic proximal femur: a biomechanical investigation of PMMA reinforcement in cadaver bones. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 19:506–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sutter EG, Mears SC, Belkoff SM (2010) A biomechanical evaluation of femoroplasty under simulated fall conditions. J Orthop Trauma 24:95–99. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b5c0c6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Beckmann J, Springorum R, Vettorazzi E et al (2011) Fracture prevention by femoroplasty-cement augmentation of the proximal femur: fracture prevention by femoroplasty. J Orthop Res 29:1753–1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M et al (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34:859–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00040-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Deng C, Gillette JC, Derrick TR (2021) Finite element analysis of femoral neck strains during stair ascent and descent. Sci Rep 11:9183. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87936-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth A. Egol.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of NYU Langone Health. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Informed consent

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of NYU Langone Health, and written informed consent was obtained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esper, G.W., Meltzer-Bruhn, A.T., Anil, U. et al. Periprosthetic fracture following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: is a cemented stem protective?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03830-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03830-5

Keywords

Navigation