Skip to main content
Log in

Acute versus staged fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a dual centre international study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures pose many treatment challenges due to their complex fracture patterns and associated soft tissue compromise. We aim to evaluate outcomes of acute ORIF (aORIF) versus staged ORIF (sORIF) of high energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 186 patients at two high-volume Level I trauma centers. One hundred one patients underwent aORIF and 85 underwent sORIF between 2011 and 2019. Clinical outcomes of interest included operative time, wound dehiscence, superficial and deep infection, nonunion, flap coverage, arthrodesis, and early conversion to arthroplasty.

Results

Patients had a median follow up of 12 months (6–98 months). The sORIF group had a higher ISS (p = 0.02) and a higher rate of open fractures (24.7% vs 11.9%, p = 0.03). The groups were statistically similar in other demographics and co-morbidities. Operative time was significantly shorter in the aORIF group (157 vs 213 min., p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in wound dehiscence, deep infection, flap coverage, nonunion, unplanned reoperation, or post-traumatic arthritis between groups. However, aORIF was associated with a significantly lower rate of superficial infection (p = 0.01), arthroplasty (p = 0.003) and unplanned reoperation (p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis of only the 41C3 fractures showed a lower rate of superficial infections in the aORIF group (p = 0.04). No difference in complications was found between the fracture subgroups.

Conclusion

We found no increased risk of complications with aORIF compared to sORIF for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. While not all injuries may be appropriate for aORIF, our results demonstrate the safety of aORIF when patients are properly selected by experienced fracture surgeons.

Level of evidence

Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D (1979) The tibial plateau fracture. The toronto experience 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res 138:94–104

    Google Scholar 

  2. Young MJ, Barrack RL (1994) Complications of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev 23:149–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett WF, Browner B (1994) Tibial plateau fractures: a study of associated soft tissue injuries. J Orthop Trauma 8:183–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biyani A, Reddy NS, Chaudhury J et al (1995) The results of surgical management of displaced tibial plateau fractures in the elderly. Injury 26:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)00027-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Subasi M, Kapukaya A, Arslan H et al (2007) Outcome of open comminuted tibial plateau fractures treated using an external fixator. J Orthop Sci 12:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1149-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Katsenis D, Dalas A (1996) Treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fractures by the Ilizarov circular fixator. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:710–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Virkus WW, Caballero J, Kempton LB et al (2018) Costs and complications of single-stage fixation versus 2-stage treatment of select bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 32:327–332. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao X-W, Ma J-X, Ma X-L et al (2017) A meta-analysis of external fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. Int J Surg 39:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore TM, Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP (1987) Tibial plateau fractures: definition, demographics, treatment rationale, and long-term results of closed traction management or operative reduction. J Orthop Trauma 1:97–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mallik AR, Covall DJ, Whitelaw GP (1992) Internal versus external fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev 21:1433–1436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barei DP, Nork SE, Mills WJ et al (2004) Complications associated with internal fixation of high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures utilizing a two-incision technique. J Orthop Trauma 18:649–657. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200411000-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marsh JL, Smith ST, Do TT (1995) External fixation and limited internal fixation for complex fractures of the tibial plateau. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:661–673. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199505000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morris BJ, Unger RZ, Archer KR et al (2013) Risk factors of infection after ORIF of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 27:e196-200. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318284704e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Unno F, Lefaivre KA, Osterhoff G et al (2017) Is early definitive fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures safe? An observational cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 31:151–157. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Olszewski N, Manzano G, Wilson E et al (2022) Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: what predicts infection? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 30:e1311–e1318. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wasserstein D, Henry P, Paterson JM et al (2014) Risk of total knee arthroplasty after operatively treated tibial plateau fracture: a matched-population-based cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:144–150. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Albright P, Only A, Parikh HR et al (2022) External fixation characteristics drive cost of care for high-energy tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 36:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan R. Mir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

An IRB review was carried out for this study and was found eligible for exemption. This material is the authors' own original work, which has not been previously published and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mesa, L., Lufrano, R.C., Sajid, M.I. et al. Acute versus staged fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a dual centre international study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 34, 1683–1690 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03815-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03815-4

Keywords

Navigation