Skip to main content
Log in

Midshaft clavicle fractures: is anterior plating an acceptable alternative to superior plating?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine whether anterior plating is better tolerated than superior plating for midshaft clavicle fractures.

Methods

This was a prospective non-randomized observational cohort study following operative vs. non-operative management of clavicle fractures from 2003 to 2018 at 7 level 1 academic trauma centers in the USA. The subset of patients treated with plate and screws is the basis for this comparative study. Adults aged 18–85 with closed clavicle fractures displaced over 100% or shortened by more than 1.5 cm were eligible for enrollment. Patients were followed for 2 years following enrollment. Allowable fixation methods at the discretion of the surgeon consisted of anterior–inferior or superior plating. A total of 412 patients were enrolled. Of these, 192 patients received either superior or anterior plating for a displaced clavicle fracture with complete documented prospective research forms capturing type of plating technique. The primary outcome measure was hardware removal (HWR). Secondary outcomes were Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and Visual Analog Pain (VAP) score, and satisfaction score (1 = high satisfaction; 5 = low satisfaction).

Results

There was no difference in HWR rates (7.1% superior 9/127; 6.2% anterior 4/65, p = 0.81), VAP score (mean 1.5 SD 1.0 superior; mean 1.7 SD 0.6 anterior, p = 0.21), DASH score (mean 7.5 SD 12.4 superior; mean 5.2 SD 15.2 anterior; p = 0.18) or satisfaction score (mean 1.6 SD 1.0 superior; mean 1.7 SD 0.60 anterior, p = 0.18).

Conclusion

There is no difference in HWR rates or functional outcomes when using a superior vs. anterior plating technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F (2002) Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:452–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nordqvist, A. & Petersson, C. (1994): The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 127–132

  3. Trauma CO, S. (2007) Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zlowodzki M et al (2005) Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the evidence-based orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma 19:504–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kloen P, Sorkin AT, Rubel IF, Helfet DL (2002) Anteroinferior plating of midshaft clavicular nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 16:425–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Collinge C, Devinney S, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R (2006) Anterior-inferior plate fixation of middle-third fractures and nonunions of the clavicle. J Orthop Trauma 20:680–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Serrano R et al (2017) Anterior-inferior plating results in fewer secondary interventions compared to superior plating for acute displaced Midshaft clavicle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 31:468–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Franchignoni F et al (2014) Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44:30–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP (2009) Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:927–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzgerald EM, Moore DM, Quinlan JF (2022) A review of outcomes after operative fixation of clavicular fractures over a 10-year period-a single tertiary trauma unit experience. JSES Int 6:264–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Naimark M et al (2016) Plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures: patient-reported outcomes and hardware-related complications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:739–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nourian A, Dhaliwal S, Vangala S, Vezeridis PS (2017) Midshaft fractures of the clavicle: a meta-analysis comparing surgical fixation using anteroinferior plating versus superior plating. J Orthop Trauma 31:461–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheth U, Fernandez CE, Morgan AM, Henry P, Nam D (2022) Are two plates better than one? A systematic review of dual plating for acute midshaft clavicle fractures. Shoulder Elbow 14:500–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zielinski E, Doe K, Perdue P (2022) Dual plate minifragment fixation of clavicle fractures- technique and approach. J Orthop Trauma 36:S1–S2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was performed through the Southeastern Fracture Consortium with the writing committee consisting of the authors. Each site PI for the Southeastern Fracture Consortium is considered a co-author of this manuscript by the Vancouver model. The authors declare no conflict of interest for this study.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

All authors contributed to patient enrollment and participated in manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian H. Mullis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Informed consent

This study was IRB approved and all patients provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by each institutional IRB, and informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to enrollment. This study complies with current US laws.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mullis, B.H., Jeray, K.J., Broderick, S. et al. Midshaft clavicle fractures: is anterior plating an acceptable alternative to superior plating?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 3373–3377 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03563-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03563-5

Keywords

Navigation