Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fracture characteristics and outcomes of acetabular fracture management with minimally invasive approach and percutaneous fixation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to assess acetabular fracture outcomes of percutaneous fixation (PF) with or without minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

Methods

Between July 2011 and October 2016, acetabular fractures fixed with PF with or without MIS were included. Data collected are demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, time to surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, fracture characteristics, surgical techniques, fracture reduction, secondary osteoarthritis (OA), revision surgery, patient survival and complications.

Results

Of 26 patients with a mean age of 56 years (19–86) (22 males and 4 females), 11 were < 50 years age (U50) and 15 were > 50 years (A50). Most common pattern was anterior column with posterior hemi-transverse. Three out of 11 U50 were minimally displaced and had PF only; the rest had MIS and PF. All had good fracture reduction, but 2 had secondary OA at follow-up but no further surgery. Eight out of 26 had secondary OA but only 3 needed surgery. Three (A50 with PF) with fair/poor reduction (deemed unfit for open reduction) had secondary OA but no further intervention. Three more (A50 with MIS + PF) had secondary OA treated with primary total hip replacement (THR). Complications were as follows: one foot drop recovered after immediate repositioning of screw, one cardiac event and one pulmonary embolism.

Conclusion

Fracture mal-reduction predicts secondary OA, but good fracture reduction does not prevent secondary OA. MIS and PF in elderly are useful even with suboptimal reduction as it sets the bed for a non-complex THR. Despite MIS surgery, medical complications are potentially significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1615–1646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Daurka JS, Pastides PS, Lewis A, Rickman M, Bircher MD (2014) Acetabular fractures in patients aged > 55 years: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J 96(2):157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Laird A, Keating JFJ (2005) Acetabular fractures: a 16-year prospective epidemiological study. Bone Joint Surg Br 87(7):969–973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, Bircher M (2011) Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:229–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dailey SK, Archdeacon MT (2014) Open reduction and internal fixation of acetabulum fractures: does timing of surgery affect blood loss and OR time? J Orthop Trauma 28:497–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnussen RA, Tressler MA, Obremskey WT, Kregor PJ (2007) Predicting blood loss in isolated pelvic and acetabular high-energy trauma. J Orthop Trauma 21:603–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin YC, Chen CH, Huang HT et al (2008) Percutaneous antegrade screwing for anterior column fracture of acetabulum with fluoroscopic-based computerized navigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:223–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ochs BG, Stuby FM, Ateschrang A, Stoeckle U, Gonser CE (2014) Retrograde lag screw placement in anterior acetabular column with regard to the anterior pelvic plane and midsagittal plane - virtual mapping of 260 three-dimensional hemipelvises for quantitative anatomic analysis. Injury 45:1590–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mears DC (1999) Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:128–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Karunakar MA, Shah SN, Jerabek S (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of complications after operative treatment of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 87:1498e502

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sems SA, Johnson M, Cole PA, Byrd CT, Templeman DC (2010) Minnesota orthopaedic trauma group elevated body mass index increases early complications of surgical treatment of pelvic ring injuries. J Orthop Trauma 24:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gary JL, VanHal M, Gibbons SD, Reinert CM, Starr AJ (2012) Functional outcomes in elderly patients with acetabular fractures treated with minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation. J Orthop Trauma 25(5):278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Letournel E (2007) Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Orthop Trauma Dir 5(05):27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Caviglia H, Mejail A, Landro ME, Vatani N (2018) Percutaneous fixation of acetabular fractures. EFORT Open Rev 3(5):326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Helfet DL, Schmeling GJ (1994) Management of complex acetabular fractures through single nonextensile exposures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Judet R, Letournel E (1974) Les fractures du cotyle. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  17. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MRW, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg British Vol 87(1):2–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baker G, McMahon SE, Warnock M et al (2020) Outcomes of conservatively managed complex acetabular fractures in the frail and elderly one year post injury. Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Magu NK, Rohilla R, Arora S (2012) Conservatively treated acetabular fractures: a retrospective analysis. Indian J Orthop 46(1):36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Crowl AC, Kahler DM (2002) Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures. Comput Aided Surg 7(3):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gary JL, VanHal M, Gibbons SD, Reinert CM, Starr AJ (2012) Functional outcomes in elderly patients with acetabular fractures treated with minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation. J Orthop Trauma 26(5):278–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31823836d2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Starr AJ, Jones AL, Reinert CM, Borer DS (2001) Preliminary results and complications following limited open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of displaced fractures of the actabulum. Injury 32:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants or other supports were received. The authors declare they have no financial interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the work of the paper, confirm that the data provided are accurate and approve the final version being submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekansh Debuka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Nothing to disclose.

Availability of data and material

All data were used from hospital records maintaining full patient confidentiality.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Debuka, E., Kumar, G., Dalal, N. et al. Fracture characteristics and outcomes of acetabular fracture management with minimally invasive approach and percutaneous fixation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 1363–1368 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02886-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02886-5

Keywords

Navigation