Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of continuous interscalene block versus general anesthesia alone on the functional outcomes of the patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

  • Original Article • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to compare the effects of general anesthesia to the combination of general anesthesia and continuous interscalene block on postoperative pain and functional outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods

This study included a total of 85 patients aged 45–74 years, who were scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. One group consists of patients who underwent only general anesthesia (GA, N = 43), and the other group consists of patients who underwent a combination of continuous interscalene brachial plexus block and general anesthesia (CISB + GA, N = 42). Pain levels of the patients were evaluated postoperatively by a visual analog scale. Shoulder function was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the Constant score.

Results

Patients in the CISB + GA group had lower postoperative visual analog scores and less additional analgesic needs during the early postoperative period than those in the GA group. Constant scores of the patients in the CISB + GA group at postoperative week 6 were higher than those in the GA group. Evaluation of the functional outcomes at 6 months postoperatively showed that there were no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion

Although CISB significantly improved postoperative pain control and early (in the first 6 weeks) functional outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, there was no significant difference between the CISB group and CISB + GA group at 6 months.

Level of evidence

Level II, Randomized Controlled Trial, Treatment Study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Verhaar JA (2004) Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol 33(2):73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jain NB, Fan R, Higgins LD, Kuhn JE, Ayers GD (2018) Does my patient with shoulder pain have a rotator cuff tear? A predictive model from the row cohort. Orthop J Sports Med 6(7):2325967118784897. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118784897

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Plachel F, Traweger A, Vasvary I, Schanda JE, Resch H, Moroder P (2018) Long-term results after arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Day M, Westermann R, Duchman K, Gao Y, Pugely A, Bollier M, Wolf B (2018) Comparison of short-term complications after rotator cuff repair: open versus arthroscopic. Arthroscopy 34(4):1130–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop JY, Sprague M, Gelber J, Krol M, Rosenblatt MA, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL (2006) Interscalene regional anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a safe and effective technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(5):567–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu CL, Rouse LM, Chen JM, Miller RJ (2002) Comparison of postoperative pain in patients receiving interscalene block or general anesthesia for shoulder surgery. Orthopedics 25(1):45–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perlas A, Chan VW (2004) Ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag 8(4):143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehmann LJ, Loosen G, Weiss C, Schmittner MD (2015) Interscalene plexus block versus general anaesthesia for shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(2):255–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1483-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta S, Manjuladevi M, Vasudeva Upadhyaya KS, Kutappa AM, Amaravathi R, Arpana J (2016) Effects of irrigation fluid in shoulder arthroscopy. Indian J Anaesth 60(3):194–198. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.177866

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG (2005) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(6):1229–1240. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Horiuchi S, Nozaki T, Tasaki A, Yamakawa A, Kaneko Y, Hara T, Yoshioka H (2017) Reliability of MR quantification of rotator cuff muscle fatty degeneration using a 2-point Dixon technique in comparison with the Goutallier classification: validation study by multiple readers. Acad Radiol 24(11):1343–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.03.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rocourt MH, Radlinger L, Kalberer F, Sanavi S, Schmid NS, Leunig M, Hertel R (2008) Evaluation of intratester and intertester reliability of the Constant–Murley shoulder assessment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(2):364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blonna D, Scelsi M, Marini E, Bellato E, Tellini A, Rossi R, Bonasia DE, Castoldi F (2012) Can we improve the reliability of the Constant–Murley score? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(1):4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Calvo E, Torres MD, Morcillo D, Leal V (2018) Rotator cuff repair is more painful than other arthroscopic shoulder procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3100-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bowens C Jr, Sripada R (2012) Regional blockade of the shoulder: approaches and outcomes. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2012:971963. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/971963

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Salviz EA, Xu D, Frulla A, Kwofie K, Shastri U, Chen J, Shariat AN, Littwin S, Lin E, Choi J, Hobeika P, Hadzic A (2013) Continuous interscalene block in patients having outpatient rotator cuff repair surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg 117(6):1485–1492. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000436607.40643.0a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JH, Koh HJ, Kim DK, Lee HJ, Kwon KH, Lee KY, Kim YS (2018) Interscalene brachial plexus bolus block versus patient-controlled interscalene indwelling catheter analgesia for the first 48 hours after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27(7):1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Faryniarz D, Morelli C, Coleman S, Holmes T, Allen A, Altchek D, Cordasco F, Warren RF, Urban MK, Gordon MA (2006) Interscalene block anesthesia at an ambulatory surgery center performing predominantly regional anesthesia: a prospective study of one hundred thirty-three patients undergoing shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(6):686–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chelly JE, Greger J, Gebhard R, Coupe K, Clyburn TA, Buckle R, Criswell A (2001) Continuous femoral blocks improve recovery and outcome of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 16(4):436–445. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.23622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hadzic A, Arliss J, Kerimoglu B, Karaca PE, Yufa M, Claudio RE, Vloka JD, Rosenquist R, Santos AC, Thys DM (2004) A comparison of infraclavicular nerve block versus general anesthesia for hand and wrist day-case surgeries. Anesthesiology 101(1):127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yan S, Zhao Y, Zhang H (2018) Efficacy and safety of interscalene block combined with general anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 47:74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Malik T, Mass D, Cohn S (2016) Postoperative analgesia in a prolonged continuous interscalene block versus single-shot block in outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 32(8):1544–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Klein SM, Grant SA, Greengrass RA, Nielsen KC, Speer KP, White W, Warner DS, Steele SM (2000) Interscalene brachial plexus block with a continuous catheter insertion system and a disposable infusion pump. Anesth Analg 91(6):1473–1478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stevens MF, Werdehausen R, Golla E, Braun S, Hermanns H, Ilg A, Willers R, Lipfert P (2007) Does interscalene catheter placement with stimulating catheters improve postoperative pain or functional outcome after shoulder surgery? A prospective, randomized and double-blinded trial. Anesth Analg 104(2):442–447. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000253513.15336.25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gallagher BP, Bishop ME, Tjoumakaris FP, Freedman KB (2015) Early versus delayed rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed 43(2):178–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2015.1025683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gillespie R, Shishani Y, Streit J, Wanner JP, McCrum C, Syed T, Haas A, Gobezie R (2012) The safety of controlled hypotension for shoulder arthroscopy in the beach-chair position. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(14):1284–1290. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Memon M, Kay J, Gholami A, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR (2018) Fluid extravasation in shoulder arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med 6(5):2325967118771616. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118771616

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lenters TR, Davies J, Matsen FA 3rd (2007) The types and severity of complications associated with interscalene brachial plexus block anesthesia: local and national evidence. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(4):379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nickless JT, Waterman BR, Romeo AA (2018) Persistent diaphragmatic paralysis associated with interscalene nerve block after total shoulder arthroplasty: a case report. JSES Open Access 2(3):165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2018.05.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Gurger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gurger, M., Ozer, A.B. A comparison of continuous interscalene block versus general anesthesia alone on the functional outcomes of the patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29, 1659–1666 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02482-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02482-8

Keywords

Navigation