Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment goals for distal radius fractures in 2018: recommendations and practical advice

  • General Review • WRIST - FRACTURES
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goals of distal radius fracture treatment in patients above 65 years of age would not change over time if the fracture were the only factor to consider. However, people change, and fixation methods also change. Since this fracture heals in nearly every case and volar plates have eliminated the worry of malunion, we are left with two main goals. In active patients with weakened bones, the aim is to help them regain their quality of life as quickly as possible while avoiding iatrogenic conditions. This compromise is possible because of new tools—but at what price?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HAS (2006) Ostéodensitométrie (absorbimétrie osseuse) sur 2 sites par méthode biphotonique. https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/osteodensitometrie_rapport.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

  2. Hegeman JH, Oskam J, van der Palen J, Ten Duis HJ, Vierhout PA (2004) The distal radial fracture in elderly women and the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip. J Hand Surg Br 29:473–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Danish Health Authority (2016) National clinical guideline on the treatment of distal radial fractures. Danish Health Authority Islands Brygge 67 DK-2300 Copenhagen S Denmark. http://www.sst.dk/english. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

  4. Zelle BA, Zlowodzki M (2012) Distal radius fractures. In: Bhandari M (ed) Evidences-based orthopedics. Wiley Blackwell, Hamilton, p 425

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grewal R (2012) Acute management of distal radius fractures. In: Bhandari M (ed) Evidence-based orthopedics. Wiley Blackwell, Hamilton, pp 913–922

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mac Dermid JC, Grewal R (2012) Prognosis, pain and disability after distal radius fracture. In: Bhandari M (ed) Evidences-based orthopedics. Wiley Blackwell, Hamilton, pp 923–929

    Google Scholar 

  7. Monica JT, Ring D (2012) Reconstruction of malunited distal radius. In: Bhandari M (ed) Evidences-based orthopedics. Wiley Blackwell, Hamilton, p 930

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drame M, Dia PA, Jolly D, Lang PO, Mahmoudi R, Schwebel G et al (2009) Factors predictive of long-term mortality in patients aged 75 years or older hospitalized from the emergency department: the SAFES cohort. Presse Med 38:1068–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacova C, Hsiung GY, Feldman HH (2006) Dropouts and refusals in observational studies. Neurology 14:S17–S20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huard S, Blanchet N, Leclerc G, Rochet S, Lepage D, Garbuio P, Obert L (2010) Fractures of the distal radius in patients over 70 years old: volar plates or K-wires? Chir Main 29:236–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Loisel F, Bouilloux X, Uhring J, Rochet S, Obert L (2015) Early postoperative improvements in the QuickDASH score after distal radius fracture are related to the type of surgical treatment. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:865–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arora R, Lutz M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Haug L, Gabl M (2011) A prospective randomized trial comparing nonoperative treatment with volar locking plate fixation for displaced and unstable distal radial fractures in patients sixty-five years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 7(93):2146–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JK, Koh YD, Kook SH (2011) Effect of calcium phosphate bone cement augmentation on volar plate fixation of unstable distal radial fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(7):609–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smeraglia F, Del Buono A, Maffulli N (2016) Wrist arthroscopy in the management of articular distal radius fractures. Br Med Bull 119(1):157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Bourgeois.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

L. Obert declares that he has no conflicts of interest directly related to this article, but has conflicts of interest with the following companies: FX solutions, Zimmer Biomet, Medartis, Evolutis, Wright, Lilly, Elsevier, Springer. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loisel, F., Bourgeois, M., Rondot, T. et al. Treatment goals for distal radius fractures in 2018: recommendations and practical advice. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28, 1465–1468 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2196-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2196-9

Keywords

Navigation