Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Open versus closed treatment of distal tibia physeal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Article • ANKLE - FRACTURES
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Distal tibia physeal fractures can lead to growth complications such as premature physeal closure (PPC), angular deformity and leg length discrepancy. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature to assess whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is associated with lower rates of PPC compared to closed treatment.

Materials and methods

We searched several databases from 1966 to 2016 for studies that evaluated ORIF versus closed treatment of distal tibia physeal fractures. We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model to pool odds ratios (OR) for the comparison of PPC rate between children undergoing ORIF versus closed treatment. We also investigated the PPC rate in Salter–Harris (S–H) type I and II fractures. Descriptive, quantitative and qualitative data were extracted.

Results

Out of the 253 articles identified, six retrospective cohort studies were eligible, with a total of 970 distal tibia physeal fractures. The pooled OR of PPC between ORIF and closed treatment showed no statistically significant difference [OR = 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48, 1.97; I 2 = 49.8%, p = 0.076]. No significant difference in the rate of PPC was detected in S–H type I and II fractures with ORIF and closed treatment [OR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.72, 2.16; I 2 = 32.1%, p = 0.22].

Conclusions

The cumulative evidence at present does not indicate an association between the method of treatment of distal tibia physeal fractures and the risk of PPC. Both treatment types are feasible, but less surgical-related complications are associated with closed treatment.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kraus R, Kaiser M (2008) Growth disturbances of the distal tibia after physeal separation—what do we know, what do we believe we know? A review of current literature. Eur J Pediatr Surg 18(5):295–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peterson HA, Brewster RC, Johnson KA (1977) Epiphyseal growth plate injuries of the distal tibia. Minn Med 60(1):44–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oh WH, Craig C, Banks HH (1974) Epiphyseal injuries. Pediatr Clin North Am 21(2):407–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spiegel PG, Cooperman DR, Laros GS (1978) Epiphyseal fractures of the distal ends of the tibia and fibula. A retrospective study of two hundred and thirty-seven cases in children. J Bone Jt Surg Am 60(8):1046–1050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kling TF Jr, Bright RW, Hensinger RN (1984) Distal tibial physeal fractures in children that may require open reduction. J Bone Jt Surg Am 66(5):647–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dugan G, Herndon WA, McGuire R (1987) Distal tibial physeal injuries in children: a different treatment concept. J Orthop Trauma 1(1):63–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pacicca D, Cramer K, Tornetta P (2001) Is anatomic reduction necessary for displaced physeal fractures of the distal tibia? In: Programs and abstracts of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 68th Annual Meeting. Paper No. 131

  8. Barmada A, Gaynor T, Mubarak SJ (2003) Premature physeal closure following distal tibia physeal fractures: a new radiographic predictor. J Pediatr Orthop 23(6):733–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rohmiller MT, Gaynor TP, Pawelek J, Mubarak SJ (2006) Salter–Harris I and II fractures of the distal tibia: Does mechanism of injury relate to premature physeal closure? J Pediatr Orthop 26(3):322–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leary JT, Handling M, Talerico M, Yong L, Bowe JA (2009) Physeal fractures of the distal tibia: predictive factors of premature physeal closure and growth arrest. J Pediatr Orthop 29(4):356–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schurz M, Binder H, Platzer P, Schulz M, Hajdu S, Vecsei V (2010) Physeal injuries of the distal tibia: long-term results in 376 patients. Int Orthop 34(4):547–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wirth T, Byers S, Byard RW, Hopwood JJ, Foster BK (1994) The implantation of cartilaginous and periosteal tissue into growth plate defects. Int Orthop 18(4):220–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Phieffer LS, Meyer RA Jr, Gruber HE, Easley M, Wattenbarger JM (2000) Effect of interposed periosteum in an animal physeal fracture model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 376:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Russo F, Moor MA, Mubarak SJ, Pennock AT (2013) Salter–Harris II fractures of the distal tibia: Does surgical management reduce the risk of premature physeal closure? J Pediatr Orthop 33(5):524–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–e34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salter RB, Harris WR (1963) Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Jt Surg Am 45(3):587–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Petersen J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2004) The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm

  18. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Higgins J, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/

  20. Cai H, Wang Z, Cai H (2015) Surgical indications for distal tibial epiphyseal fractures in children. Orthopedics 38(3):e189–e195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seel EH, Noble S, Clarke NM, Uglow MG (2011) Outcome of distal tibial physeal injuries. J Pediatr Orthop B 20(4):242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kay RM, Matthys GA (2001) Pediatric ankle fractures: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9(4):268–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Section of Orthopedics, Hamad General Hospital, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar

    Waleed A. Asad, Manaf H. S. Younis, Abdulaziz F. Ahmed & Talal Ibrahim

Authors
  1. Waleed A. Asad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manaf H. S. Younis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdulaziz F. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Talal Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talal Ibrahim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asad, W.A., Younis, M.H.S., Ahmed, A.F. et al. Open versus closed treatment of distal tibia physeal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28, 503–509 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2062-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2062-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation