Abstract
Background
Healthy shoulder morphology is still unclear. Since bone morphology influences prosthetic features, this is relevant for glenohumeral joint reconstruction. The objective of this study was to assess the normal values of glenoid version, maximum width, base width and vault depth on computed tomography scans.
Methods
Axial cut CT scans of 1072 healthy glenoids were retrospectively reviewed. Values of glenoid version, maximum glenoid width, glenoid base width and glenoid vault depth were measured by two different observers. Differences were determined between genders, and reproducibility and interrater reliability assessed.
Results
Glenoid version was 37.71° ± 10.75°, range −6.20° to 71.30°; maximum glenoid width was 26.06 ± 3.27 mm, range 15.40–36.90 mm; glenoid base width was 16.59 ± 2.61 mm, range 8.90–25.40 mm; glenoid vault depth was 9.72 ± 1.62 mm, range 4.70–15.90 mm. All measurements except for glenoid version were significantly higher in males than in females. Reproducibility was good for every measurement, except glenoid vault depth.
Conclusion
We found differences in maximum glenoid width, base width and vault depth by gender in a large sample. Glenoid components’ maximum width was defined, as was reaming extension and orientation, the space available for implantation of the glenoid component, placement of pegs or keels in anatomic prostheses and the target for glenoid screws in inverted prostheses.
Level of evidence
II.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gregory T, Hansen U, Emery RJ, Augereau B, Amis AA (2007) Developments in shoulder arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221(1):87–96
Hoenecke HR Jr, Hermida JC, Flores-Hernandez C, D’Lima DD (2010) Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(2):166–171
Hoenecke HR Jr, Tibor LM, D’Lima DD (2012) Glenoid morphology rather than version predicts humeral subluxation: a different perspective on the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(9):1136–1141
Strauss EJ, Roche C, Flurin PH, Wright T, Zuckerman JD (2009) The glenoid in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(5):819–833
Williams GR, Abboud JA (2005) Total shoulder arthroplasty: glenoid component design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(1 Suppl S):122S–128S
Sharma GB, McMahon PJ, Robertson DD (2014) Structure modeling of the glenoid: relevance to shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 32(11):1471–1478
Singh JA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2011) Revision surgery following total shoulder arthroplasty: analysis of 2588 shoulders over three decades (1976 to 2008). J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(11):1513–1517
Churchill RS, Brems JJ, Kotschi H (2001) Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10(4):327–332. doi:10.1067/mse.2001.115269
Matsumura N, Ogawa K, Kobayashi S, Oki S, Watanabe A, Ikegami H, Toyama Y (2014) Morphologic features of humeral head and glenoid version in the normal glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(11):1724–1730. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.020
Kwon YW, Powell KA, Yum JK, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP (2005) Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(1):85–90. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.04.011
Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A (1999) Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14(6):756–760
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding this paper.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent from patients was not necessary since this was a retrospective study of 1000 examinations, in which patient personal data were not used/accessed in any way, as is usual in this kind of studies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Damas, C.N., Silva, J., Sá, M.C. et al. Computed tomography morphological analysis of the scapula and its implications in shoulder arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 127–132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1721-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1721-3