Skip to main content
Log in

Morphometric analysis of the odontoid process: using computed tomography—in the Greek population

  • Original Article • SPINE - ANATOMY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

A morphometric analysis of the odontoid process of the A2 vertebra, in the Greek population, was conducted using CT scan. We aimed to determine the feasibility to use one or two screws when treating fractures of this anatomic element.

Patients and methods

One hundred and fifteen patients (57 men) of a mean age of 48 years (16–95 years) underwent a cervical spine CT scan examination. The anterior–posterior and transverse diameters of the odontoid process were measured from the base, at 1-mm interval upward on axial CT images. The length from the tip of the odontoid process to the anterior–inferior angle of the body of the axis was calculated. Data concerning the height and weight of the examined patients were collected.

Results

The mean transverse and anterior–posterior distances were found to be 11.46 and 10.45 mm, respectively, for the upper end of the odontoid process. At the neck level of the odontoid process, the equivalent mean values were 11.12 and 8.73 mm, respectively, while at the base, these distances were found to be 13.84 and 12.3 mm, respectively. The mean distance from the tip of the odontoid to its base was 17.25 and 17.28 mm, respectively, while the mean distance from the tip of the dens to the anterior–inferior corner of the axis’ body was 39.2 mm. Men showed greater values than women.

Conclusions

In this study, it was shown that in the Greek population there is enough room for one 4.5-mm or one 3.5-mm cannulated screw to be used. The application of two 3.5-mm screws is feasible in 58.6 % of the male and 26.3 % of the female population. This confirms that the knowledge of the true dimensions of the odontoid process is of paramount importance before the proper management of fractured dens using the anterior screw technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Korres DS (2013) Fractures of the odontoid process. Chap 6, in the «The Axis Vertebra». Springer, Berlin

  2. Bohler J (1982) Anterior stabilization for acute fractures and nonunions of the dens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:18–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daher Mario Tavares, Daher Sergio, Nogueira-Barbosa Murilio Henrique, Defino Helton Luiz Aparecido (2011) Computed tomographic evaluation of odontoid process: implications for anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures in an adult population. Eur Spine J 20:1908–1914

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nucci RC, Seigal S, Merola AA, Gorup J, Mroczek KJ, Dryer J, Zipnick RI, Haher TR (1995) Computed tomographic evaluation of the normal adult odontoid. Implications for internal fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:264–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yusof MI, Yusof AH, Abdullah MS, Hussin TM (2007) Computed tomographic evaluation of the odontoid process for two-screw fixation in type-II fracture: a Malaysian perspective. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15:67–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Korres DS, Mavrogenis AF, Gratsias PE, Lyritis G, Papagelopoulos PJ (2008) It is time to reconsider the classification of dens fractures: an anatomical approach. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 18:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Korres DS, Stamos KG, Andreakos AG, HArdouvelis CHR, Kouris A (1989) Fractures of the dens at risk of pseudarthrosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:373–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakirci S, Sendemir E, Kafa IM (2014) Morphometric analysis of C2 vertebra. Acta Med Mediter 30:269–272

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tun Kegan, Kaptanoglou Erkan, Cemil Berger, Mehmet Yorubulut S, Karahan Tuna, Tekdemir Imbrahim (2009) Anatomical study of axis for odontoid srew thickness, length and angle. Eur Spine J 18:271–275

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Naderi S, Arman C, Guvencer M, Korkman E, Senoglu M, Telik S, Arna MN (2006) Morphometric analysis of C2 body and the odontoid process. Turk Neurosurg 16:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koulkami AG, Shah MS, Marvah RA, Hanagandi PB, Talwar IR (2015) CT based evaluation of odontoid morphology in the Indian population. Indian J Orthop 47(3):250–254

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schaffler MB, Alson MD, Heller JG, Garfin SR (1992) Morphology of the dens. A quantitative study. Spine 17:738–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Korres DS, Karachalios T, Roidis N et al (2004) Structural properties of the axis studied in cadaveric specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. El Saghir H, Bohm H (2000) Anderson type II fracture of the odontoid process: results of anterior screw fixation. J Spinal Disord 13:527–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McBride AD, Mukherjee DP, Kruse RN, Albright JA (1995) Anterior screw fixation of type II odontoid fractures: a biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 20:1855–1860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasso R, Doherty BJ, Crawford MJ, Heggeness MH (1993) Biomechanics of odontoid fracture fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1950–1953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Doherty BJ, Heggeness MH, Esses SI (1993) A biomechanical study of odontoid fractures and fracture fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(2):178–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Doherty BJ, Heggeness MH (1995) Quantitative anatomy of the second cervical vertebra. Spine 20:513–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding has received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. S. Nikolaou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and with its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korres, D.S., Lazaretos, J., Papailiou, J. et al. Morphometric analysis of the odontoid process: using computed tomography—in the Greek population. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 119–125 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1717-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1717-z

Keywords

Navigation