Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative supine pelvic incidence predicts standing pelvic incidence following S2AI fixation in patients with adult spinal deformity: a prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

A prospective study.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the PI change in different postures and before and after S2‑alar‑iliac (S2AI) screw fixation, and to investigate whether pre-op supine PI could predict post-op standing PI.

Summary of background data

Previous studies have reported PI may change with various positions. Some authors postulated that the unexpected PI change in ASD patients could be due to sacroiliac joint laxity, S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement, or aggressive sagittal cantilever technique. However, there was a lack of investigation on how to predict post-op standing PI when making surgical strategy.

Methods

A prospective case series of ASD patients undergoing surgical correction with S2AI screw placement was conducted. Full-spine X-ray films were obtained at pre-op standing, pre-op supine, pre-op prone, as well as post-op standing postures. Pelvic parameters were measured. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine relationships between each parameter.

Results

A total of 83 patients (22 males, 61females) with a mean age of 58.4 ± 9.5 years were included in this study. Pre-op standing PI was significantly lower than post-op standing PI (p = 0.004). Pre-op prone PI was significantly lower than post-op standing PI (p = 0.001). By contrast, no significant difference was observed between pre-op supine and post-op standing PI (p = 0.359) with a mean absolute difference of 2.2° ± 1.9°. Correlation analysis showed supine PI was significantly correlated with post-op standing PI (r = 0.951, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study revealed the PI changed after S2AI screw fixation. The pre-op supine PI can predict post-op standing PI precisely, which facilitates to provide correction surgery strategy with a good reference for ideal sagittal alignment postoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W et al (1985) Toward standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine 10(1):83–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J et al (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Duval-Beaupère G, Schmidt C, Cosson P (1992) A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20(4):451–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riccardo C, Marco D, Maryem I et al (2015) Successful correction of sagittal imbalance can be calculated on the basis of pelvic incidence and age. Glob Spine J 5(1):s-0035

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hu Z, Man G, Yeung KH et al (2019) Age- and gender-related normative value of whole-body sagittal alignment based on 584 asymptomatic Chinese adult population from age 20 to 89. Spine 45(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schlösser TPC, Janssen MMA, Hogervorst T et al (2017) The odyssey of sagittal pelvic morphology during human evolution: a perspective on different Hominoidae. Spine J 17:S1529943017301110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mikula AL, Fogelson JL, Oushy S et al (2021) Change in pelvic incidence between the supine and standing positions in patients with bilateral sacroiliac joint vacuum signs. J Neurosurg Spine 34(4):617–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleck CJ, Noshchenko A, Burger EL et al (2021) Postoperative pelvic incidence (PI) change may impact sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSA) after instrumented surgical correction of adult spine deformity (ASD). Spine Deform 9(4):1093–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bao H, Liabaud B, Varghese J et al (2018) Lumbosacral stress and age may contribute to increased pelvic incidence: an analysis of 1625 adults. Eur Spine J 27(2):482–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Place H, Hayes A, Huebner S et al (2017) Pelvic incidence: a fixed value or can you change it? Spine J 17(10):1565–1569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei C, Zuckerman SL, Cerpa M et al (2020) Can pelvic incidence change after spinal deformity correction to the pelvis with S2-alar-iliac screws? Eur Spine J 30:2486–2494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tseng C, Liu Z, Bao H et al (2019) Long fusion to the pelvis with S2-alar-iliac screws can induce changes in pelvic incidence in adult spinal deformity patients: analysis of predictive factors in a retrospective cohort. Eur Spine J 28:138–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J et al (2004) Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(20):2284–2289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Skalli W, Vergari C, Ebermeyer E et al (2017) Early detection of progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a severity index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(11):823–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L et al (2017) Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99(19):1661–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma H, Hu Z, Shi B et al (2022) Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score in asymptomatic individuals: is it universal? Spine J 22(9):1566–1575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bao H, Zhang Y, Shu S et al (2020) Position related change of pelvic incidence depends on the non-fused sacroiliac joint in patients with degenerative spinal diseases. Spine 46:796–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu Z, Tseng CC, Li J et al (2022) Dynamic change of pelvic incidence after long fusion to pelvis with S2-alar-iliac screw: a 2-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 31(12):3566–3572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 82072518) and the Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation (No. QRX17126) funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Liu.

Ethics declarations

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Z., Qian, Z., Li, W. et al. Preoperative supine pelvic incidence predicts standing pelvic incidence following S2AI fixation in patients with adult spinal deformity: a prospective study. Eur Spine J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08195-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08195-9

Keywords

Navigation