Skip to main content
Log in

Validating the preoperative Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index for the Neck and comparing quality of life in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament by the patient-reported outcome measures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This cross-sectional study serves two main purposes. Firstly, it aims to validate the preoperative Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index for the Neck (COMI-Neck) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Secondly, it seeks to elucidate differences in preoperative quality of life (QOL) between these two cervical pathologies using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

A total of 103 preoperative patients (86 with CSM and 17 with OPLL) scheduled for cervical spine surgery were included in the study. Validated PROMs, including the Japanese COMI-Neck, Neck Disability Index (NDI), EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 level (EQ-5D-3L), and SF-12v2, were used to assess QOL. Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected, and statistical analyses were performed to compare the PROMs between CSM and OPLL groups.

Results

The Japanese COMI-Neck demonstrated good construct validity, with positive correlations with NDI and negative correlations with EQ-5D-3L and SF-12v2. Comparison of preoperative PROMs between CSM and OPLL groups revealed differences in age, body mass index, and EQ-5D-3L scores. The CSM group had higher NDI scores for concentration and lower EQ-5D-3L scores for self-care compared to the OPLL group.

Conclusions

This study validated the preoperative Japanese COMI-Neck in CSM and OPLL patients and identified specific QOL issues associated with each condition. The findings highlight the importance of considering disease-specific QOL and tailoring treatment plans accordingly. Further research should include postoperative assessments and a more diverse population to enhance generalizability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The manuscript has no associated data.

References

  1. Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA et al (2013) Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1226–1232. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828be75d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCormick JR, Sama AJ, Schiller NC et al (2020) Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: a guide to diagnosis and management. J Am Board Fam Med 33:303–313. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirai T, Yoshii T, Ushio S et al (2020) Clinical characteristics in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective multi-institutional cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 10:5532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62278-3

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Stapleton CJ, Pham MH, Attenello FJ, Hsieh PC (2011) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: genetics and pathophysiology. Neurosurg Focus 30:E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.12.FOCUS10271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner A, Shiban Y, Zeller L et al (2020) Psychological predictors of quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative cervical spine disease. Sci Rep 10:13415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70437-9

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1651–1658. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nayak NR, Stephen JH, Piazza MA et al (2019) Quality of life in patients undergoing spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J 9:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217701104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oshima Y, Nagata K, Nakamoto H et al (2021) Validity of the Japanese core outcome measures index (COMI)-neck for cervical spine surgery: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 30:402–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06657-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. White P, Lewith G, Prescott P (2004) The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1923–1930. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000137066.50291.da

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takeshita K, Hosono N, Kawaguchi Y et al (2013) Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the neck disability index. J Orthop Sci 18:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0304-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Ikeda S et al (2016) Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D. Qual Life Res 25:707–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1108-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh A, Gnanalingham K, Casey A, Crockard A (2006) Quality of life assessment using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:639–643. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000202744.48633.44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fankhauser CD, Mutter U, Aghayev E, Mannion AF (2012) Validity and responsiveness of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 21:101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1921-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lubelski D, Alvin MD, Nesterenko S et al (2016) Correlation of quality of life and functional outcome measures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 24:483–489. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.6.SPINE159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oh T, Lafage R, Lafage V et al (2017) Comparing quality of life in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with other chronic debilitating diseases using the short form survey 36-health survey. World Neurosurg 106:699–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD, Ducker TB (2000) Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. A prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine Phila Pa 1976 25:670–676. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200003150-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. King JT, Abbed KM, Gould GC et al (2009) Cervical spine reoperation rates and hospital resource utilization after initial surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease in patients in 12,338 patients in Washington State. Neurosurgery 65:1011–1022. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000360347.10596.BD

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshimura N, Nagata K, Muraki S et al (2014) Prevalence and progression of radiographic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and associated factors in the Japanese population: a 3-year follow-up of the ROAD study. Osteoporos Int 25:1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2489-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sohn S, Chung CK, Yun TJ, Sohn C-H (2014) Epidemiological survey of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in an adult Korean population: three-dimensional computed tomographic observation of 3,240 cases. Calcif Tissue Int 94:613–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-014-9846-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mori K, Yoshii T, Egawa S et al (2022) Impact of obesity on cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a nationwide prospective study. Sci Rep 12:8884. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12625-3

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson JRF, Badhiwala JH, Jiang F et al (2019) The impact of older age on functional recovery and quality of life outcomes after surgical decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from an ambispective, propensity-matched analysis from the CSM-NA and CSM-I international. Multi-Center Studies J Clin Med 8:1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Hida T et al (2012) The prevalence of pre- and postoperative symptoms in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E1383-1388. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182684c68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saetia K, Cho D, Lee S et al (2011) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a review. Neurosurg Focus 30:E1. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.11.focus10276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fehlings MG, Jha NK, Hewson SM et al (2012) Is surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy cost-effective? A cost-utility analysis based on data from the AOSpine North America prospective CSM study. J Neurosurg Spine 17:89–93. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.AOSPINE111069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyokazu Akasaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript. The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device (s)/drug (s).

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board of the Saitama Medical University Medical Center, Saitama Medical University (1969-III), and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

A disclosure statement was posted on the website, with contact information for refusal to use the data for research, and the data of eligible patients who were notified of the refusal would not be used.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mizoguchi, Y., Akasaka, K., Suzuki, K. et al. Validating the preoperative Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index for the Neck and comparing quality of life in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament by the patient-reported outcome measures. Eur Spine J 33, 77–83 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07999-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07999-5

Keywords

Navigation