Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The correlation between altmetric score and traditional measures of article impact for studies pertaining to spine trauma

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It is becoming increasingly common for researchers to share scientific literature via social media. Traditional bibliometrics have long been utilized to measure a study’s academic impact, but they fail to capture the impact generated through social media sharing. Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) is a weighted count of all the online attention garnered by a study, and it is currently unclear whether a relationship with traditional bibliometrics exists.

Methods

We identified the five highest-rated spine-specific and five highest-rated general orthopedic journals by Scopus CiteScore 2020. We then identified all the spine trauma studies across a 5-year span (2016–2020) within these journals and compared AAS with traditional bibliometrics using Independent t-tests and Pearson’s correlational analyses.

Results

No statistically significant relationships were identified between AAS and traditional bibliometrics for articles pertaining to spine trauma: Level of Evidence (R = − 0.02, p = 0.34), H-Index Primary Author (R =  < − 0.01, p = 0.50), H-Index Senior Author (R = − 0.04, p = 0.24), and Number of Citations (R = 0.01, p = 0.40). The top five articles by AAS include those pertaining to motorcycle injuries (AAS = 687), orthosis in thoracolumbar fractures (AAS = 199), golfing injuries (AAS = 166), smartphone-based teleradiology (AAS = 41), and auto racing injuries (AAS = 39).

Conclusion

The lack of overlap between these types of metrics suggests that AAS or similar alternative metrics should be used to measure an article’s social impact. The social impact of an article should likewise be a factor in determining an article’s overall impact along with its academic impact as measured by bibliometrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanjeevkumar Gaur P, Gupta L (2020) Changing research paradigm in the face of a global pandemic: foreseeable impact and adaptive measures in academic research in the future. Procee Shevchenko Scientific Soc Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.25040/ntsh2020.02.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler JS, Kaye ID, Sebastian AS et al (2017) The evolution of current research impact metrics: From bibliometrics to altmetrics? Clin Spine Surg 30(5):226–228. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Altmetric Attention Score. Accessed 29th August 2022, https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000233311-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated-

  4. Altmetric Attention Score modifiers. Accessed 29th August 2022, https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000234288-altmetric-attention-score-modifiers

  5. Elmore SA (2018) The altmetric attention score: What does it mean and why should i care? Toxicol Pathol 46(3):252–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318758294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pulido CM, Redondo-Sama G, Sorde-Marti T, Flecha R (2018) Social impact in social media: a new method to evaluate the social impact of research. PLoS ONE 13(8):e0203117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Altmetric Bookmarklet for Researchers. Accessed 29th August 2022, https://www.altmetric.com/products/free-tools/bookmarklet/

  8. Adobes Martin M, Zhou WuA, Marques Martínez L, Gonzalvez Moreno AM, Aiuto R, Garcovich D (2021) What is trending in paediatric dentistry? An Altmetric study on paediatric dentistry journals. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 22(2):291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00564-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Richardson MA, Bernstein DN, Mesfin A (2021) Manuscript characteristics associated with the altmetrics score and social media presence: an analysis of seven spine journals. Spine J 21(4):548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbic D, Tubman M, Lam H, Barbic S (2016) An analysis of altmetrics in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 23(3):251–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ali SR, Dobbs TD, Slade R, Whitaker IS (2021) Multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact in the skin oncology literature: Is there a correlation between bibliometric and altmetric profiles? J Plast Surg Hand Surg 55(4):232–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1858842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gamble JM, Traynor RL, Gruzd A, Mai P, Dormuth CR, Sketris IS (2020) Measuring the impact of pharmacoepidemiologic research using altmetrics: a case study of a CNODES drug-safety article. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 29(Suppl 1):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aletaha A, Soltani A, Dokhani F (2021) Evaluating obesity publications: from bibliometrics to altmetrics. J Diabetes Metab Disord 20(1):391–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00758-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Baheti AD, Bhargava P (2017) Altmetrics: a measure of social attention toward scientific research. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 46(6):391–392. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kunze KN, Manzi JE, Polce EM, Vadhera A, Bhandari M, Piuzzi NS (2022) High social media attention scores are not reflective of study quality: an altmetrics-based content analysis. Intern Emerg Med 17(5):1363–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-02939-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Douglas NKM, Scholz M, Myers MA et al (2019) Reviewing the role of instagram in education: Can a photo sharing application deliver benefits to medical and dental anatomy education? Med Sci Educ 29(4):1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00767-510.1007/s40670-019-00767-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nikookam Y, Guckian J (2021) TikTok and dermatology: lessons for medical education. Clin Exp Dermatol 46(5):952–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saud S, Traboco L, Gupta L (2021) Harnessing the true power of altmetrics to track engagement. J Korean Med Sci 36(48):e330. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e330

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lynch CP, Cha EDK, Jacob KC et al (2022) The worldwide influence of social media on cervical spine literature. Int J Spine Surg 16(2):264–271. https://doi.org/10.14444/8213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dinsmore A, Allen L, Dolby K (2014) Alternative perspectives on impact: the potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact. PLoS Biol 12(11):e1002003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lynch CP, Cha EDK, Patel MR et al (2022) How does open access publication impact readership and citation rates of lumbar spine literature? Clin Spine Surg 35(6):E558-e565. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Clayson PE, Baldwin SA, Larson MJ (2021) The open access advantage for studies of human electrophysiology: impact on citations and altmetrics. Int J Psychophysiol 164:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. S. Fox.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fox, E.S., McDonnell, J.M., Kelly, A. et al. The correlation between altmetric score and traditional measures of article impact for studies pertaining to spine trauma. Eur Spine J 33, 1533–1539 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07962-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07962-4

Keywords

Navigation