Abstract
Purpose
It is becoming increasingly common for researchers to share scientific literature via social media. Traditional bibliometrics have long been utilized to measure a study’s academic impact, but they fail to capture the impact generated through social media sharing. Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) is a weighted count of all the online attention garnered by a study, and it is currently unclear whether a relationship with traditional bibliometrics exists.
Methods
We identified the five highest-rated spine-specific and five highest-rated general orthopedic journals by Scopus CiteScore 2020. We then identified all the spine trauma studies across a 5-year span (2016–2020) within these journals and compared AAS with traditional bibliometrics using Independent t-tests and Pearson’s correlational analyses.
Results
No statistically significant relationships were identified between AAS and traditional bibliometrics for articles pertaining to spine trauma: Level of Evidence (R = − 0.02, p = 0.34), H-Index Primary Author (R = < − 0.01, p = 0.50), H-Index Senior Author (R = − 0.04, p = 0.24), and Number of Citations (R = 0.01, p = 0.40). The top five articles by AAS include those pertaining to motorcycle injuries (AAS = 687), orthosis in thoracolumbar fractures (AAS = 199), golfing injuries (AAS = 166), smartphone-based teleradiology (AAS = 41), and auto racing injuries (AAS = 39).
Conclusion
The lack of overlap between these types of metrics suggests that AAS or similar alternative metrics should be used to measure an article’s social impact. The social impact of an article should likewise be a factor in determining an article’s overall impact along with its academic impact as measured by bibliometrics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sanjeevkumar Gaur P, Gupta L (2020) Changing research paradigm in the face of a global pandemic: foreseeable impact and adaptive measures in academic research in the future. Procee Shevchenko Scientific Soc Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.25040/ntsh2020.02.05
Butler JS, Kaye ID, Sebastian AS et al (2017) The evolution of current research impact metrics: From bibliometrics to altmetrics? Clin Spine Surg 30(5):226–228. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000531
Altmetric Attention Score. Accessed 29th August 2022, https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000233311-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated-
Altmetric Attention Score modifiers. Accessed 29th August 2022, https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000234288-altmetric-attention-score-modifiers
Elmore SA (2018) The altmetric attention score: What does it mean and why should i care? Toxicol Pathol 46(3):252–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318758294
Pulido CM, Redondo-Sama G, Sorde-Marti T, Flecha R (2018) Social impact in social media: a new method to evaluate the social impact of research. PLoS ONE 13(8):e0203117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203117
Altmetric Bookmarklet for Researchers. Accessed 29th August 2022, https://www.altmetric.com/products/free-tools/bookmarklet/
Adobes Martin M, Zhou WuA, Marques Martínez L, Gonzalvez Moreno AM, Aiuto R, Garcovich D (2021) What is trending in paediatric dentistry? An Altmetric study on paediatric dentistry journals. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 22(2):291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00564-4
Richardson MA, Bernstein DN, Mesfin A (2021) Manuscript characteristics associated with the altmetrics score and social media presence: an analysis of seven spine journals. Spine J 21(4):548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.001
Barbic D, Tubman M, Lam H, Barbic S (2016) An analysis of altmetrics in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 23(3):251–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12898
Ali SR, Dobbs TD, Slade R, Whitaker IS (2021) Multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact in the skin oncology literature: Is there a correlation between bibliometric and altmetric profiles? J Plast Surg Hand Surg 55(4):232–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1858842
Gamble JM, Traynor RL, Gruzd A, Mai P, Dormuth CR, Sketris IS (2020) Measuring the impact of pharmacoepidemiologic research using altmetrics: a case study of a CNODES drug-safety article. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 29(Suppl 1):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4401
Aletaha A, Soltani A, Dokhani F (2021) Evaluating obesity publications: from bibliometrics to altmetrics. J Diabetes Metab Disord 20(1):391–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00758-7
Baheti AD, Bhargava P (2017) Altmetrics: a measure of social attention toward scientific research. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 46(6):391–392. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.06.005
Kunze KN, Manzi JE, Polce EM, Vadhera A, Bhandari M, Piuzzi NS (2022) High social media attention scores are not reflective of study quality: an altmetrics-based content analysis. Intern Emerg Med 17(5):1363–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-02939-5
Douglas NKM, Scholz M, Myers MA et al (2019) Reviewing the role of instagram in education: Can a photo sharing application deliver benefits to medical and dental anatomy education? Med Sci Educ 29(4):1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00767-510.1007/s40670-019-00767-5
Nikookam Y, Guckian J (2021) TikTok and dermatology: lessons for medical education. Clin Exp Dermatol 46(5):952–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14624
Saud S, Traboco L, Gupta L (2021) Harnessing the true power of altmetrics to track engagement. J Korean Med Sci 36(48):e330. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e330
Lynch CP, Cha EDK, Jacob KC et al (2022) The worldwide influence of social media on cervical spine literature. Int J Spine Surg 16(2):264–271. https://doi.org/10.14444/8213
Dinsmore A, Allen L, Dolby K (2014) Alternative perspectives on impact: the potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact. PLoS Biol 12(11):e1002003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002003
Lynch CP, Cha EDK, Patel MR et al (2022) How does open access publication impact readership and citation rates of lumbar spine literature? Clin Spine Surg 35(6):E558-e565. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001303
Clayson PE, Baldwin SA, Larson MJ (2021) The open access advantage for studies of human electrophysiology: impact on citations and altmetrics. Int J Psychophysiol 164:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.03.006
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fox, E.S., McDonnell, J.M., Kelly, A. et al. The correlation between altmetric score and traditional measures of article impact for studies pertaining to spine trauma. Eur Spine J 33, 1533–1539 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07962-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07962-4