Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in scoliosis surgery: literature review of the last 10 years

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with spinal deformities undergoing corrective surgery are at risk for iatrogenic spinal cord injury (SCI) and subsequent neurological deficit. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows early detection of SCI which enables early intervention resulting in a better prognosis. The primary aim of this literature review was to search if there are threshold values of TcMEP and SSEP in the literature that are widely accepted as alert during IONM. The secondary aim was to update knowledge concerning IONM during scoliosis surgery.

Method

PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library electronic databases were used to search publication from 2012 to 2022. The following keywords were used: evoked potential, scoliosis, surgery, intraoperative monitoring and neurophysiological. We included all studies dealing with SSEP and TcMEP monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Two authors reviewed all titles and abstracts to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria.

Results

We included 43 papers. Rates of IONM alert and neurological deficit varied from 0.56 to 64% and from 0.15 to 8.3%, respectively. Threshold values varied from a loss of 50 to 90% for TcMEP amplitude, whereas it seems that a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted for SSEP. Causes of IONM changes most frequently reported were surgical maneuver.

Conclusion

Concerning SSEP, a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted as an alert. For TcMEP, it seems that the use of highest threshold values can avoid unnecessary surgical procedure for the patient without increasing risk of neurological deficit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glover CD, Carling NP (2014) Neuromonitoring for scoliosis surgery. Anesthesiol Clin 32(1):101–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Magampa RS, Dunn R (2021) Surgeon-directed transcranial motor evoked potential spinal cord monitoring in spinal deformity surgery: a review of viability, safety, and efficacy. Bone Jt J 103-B(3):547–52

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thirumala PD, Huang J, Thiagarajan K, Cheng H, Balzer J, Crammond DJ (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of combined multimodality somatosensory evoked potential and transcranial motor evoked potential intraoperative monitoring in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 41(19):E1177–E1184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Segura MJ, Talarico ME, Noel MA (2017) A Multiparametric alarm criterion for motor evoked potential monitoring during spine deformity surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol 34(1):38–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhagat S, Durst A, Grover H, Blake J, Lutchman L, Rai AS et al (2015) An evaluation of multimodal spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery: a single centre experience of 354 operations. Eur Spine J 24(7):1399–1407

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buhl LK, Bastos AB, Pollard RJ, Arle JE, Thomas GP, Song Y et al (2021) Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring for spine surgery: a practical guide from past to present. J Intensive Care Med 36(11):1237–1249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Halsey MF, Myung KS, Ghag A, Vitale MG, Newton PO, de Kleuver M (2020) Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during spinal deformity surgery: 2020 SRS neuromonitoring information statement. Spine Deform 8(4):591–596

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida G, Ando M, Imagama S, Kawabata S, Yamada K, Kanchiku T et al (2019) Alert timing and corresponding intervention with intraoperative spinal cord monitoring for high-risk spinal surgery. Spine 44(8):E470–E479

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Phillips JH, Palmer RC, Lopez D, Knapp DR, Herrera-Soto J, Isley M (2017) The recognition, incidence, and management of spinal cord monitoring alerts in early-onset scoliosis surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 37(8):e581–e587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thirumala PD, Bodily L, Tint D, Ward WT, Deeney VF, Crammond DJ et al (2014) Somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during instrumented scoliosis corrective procedures: validity revisited. Spine J 14(8):1572–1580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jahangiri FR, Sheryar M, Behairy YA (2014) Early detection of pedicle screw-related spinal cord injury by continuous intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM). Neurodiagnostic J 54(4):323–337

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clark JP, Diab M (2020) Neurophysiologic detection of spinal cord ischemia during anterior vertebral tethering. Spine 45(24):E1703–E1706

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferguson J, Hwang SW, Tataryn Z, Samdani AF (2014) Neuromonitoring changes in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a single-institution experience: clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13(3):247–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang J, Skaggs DL, Chan P, Shah SA, Vitale MG, Neiss G et al (2018) Raising mean arterial pressure alone restores 20% of intraoperative neuromonitoring losses. Spine 43(13):890–894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fonseca P, Goethel M, Vilas-Boas JP, Gutierres M, Correia MV (2021) A bibliometric analysis of intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine surgery. World Neurosurg 154:3–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rozet I, Metzner J, Brown M, Treggiari MM, Slimp JC, Kinney G et al (2015) Dexmedetomidine does not affect evoked potentials during spine surgery. Anesth Analg 121(2):492–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Helenius L, Puhakka A, Manner T, Pajulo O, Helenius I (2018) Preoperative pregabalin has no effect on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for spinal deformities: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur Spine J 27(2):298–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi B, Qiu J, Xu L, Li Y, Jiang D, Xia S et al (2020) Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials during correction surgery of scoliosis in neurologically asymptomatic Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis: a comparison with idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 191:105689

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin DP, Bhalla T, Thung A, Rice J, Beebe A, Samora W et al (2014) a preliminary study of volatile agents or total intravenous anesthesia for neurophysiological monitoring during posterior spinal fusion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 39(22):E1318–E1324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dulfer SE, Lange F, Wapstra FH, Potgieser ARE, Valk JP, Absalom AR et al (2020) Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during scoliosis surgery in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur Spine J 29(8):2029–2035

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Samdani AF, Bennett JT, Ames RJ, Asghar JK, Orlando G, Pahys JM et al (2016) Reversible intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring alerts in patients undergoing arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: what are the outcomes of surgery? J Bone Jt Surg 98(17):1478–1483

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ando K, Kobayashi K, Ito K, Tsushima M, Morozumi M, Tanaka S et al (2019) Wave change of intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potentials during corrective fusion for syndromic and neuromuscular scoliosis. Oper Neurosurg 16(1):53–58

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pankowski R, Dziegiel K, Roclawski M, Smoczynski A, Ceynowa M, Kloc W et al (2012) Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (INM) in scoliosis surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 176:319–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Polly DW, Rice K, Tamkus A (2016) What is the frequency of intraoperative alerts during pediatric spinal deformity surgery using current neuromonitoring methodology? A retrospective study of 218 surgical procedures. Neurodiagnostic J 56(1):17–31

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kobayashi K, Imagama S, Ito Z, Ando K, Hida T, Ito K et al (2017) Transcranial motor evoked potential waveform changes in corrective fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 19(1):108–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Graham RB, Cotton M, Koht A, Koski TR (2018) Loss of intraoperative neurological monitoring signals during flexed prone positioning on a hinged open frame during surgery for kyphoscoliosis correction: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 29(3):339–343

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang X, Hu H, Yan R, Li T, Wang W, Yang W (2022) Effects of rocuronium dosage on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in patients undergoing spinal surgery. J Clin Pharm Ther 47(3):313–320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. González ÁS, Pérez Lorensu PJ, Gómez SC, Nodarse Medina JF, Torres Dios JÁ (2017) What can we learn from two consecutive cases? Droperidol may abolish TcMEPs. Turk J Anesth Reanim 45(1):53–55

    Google Scholar 

  29. Furutani K, Matsuhashi M, Deguchi H, Mitsuma Y, Ohashi N, Baba H (2018) Marked attenuation of the amplitude of transcranial motor-evoked potentials after intravenous bolus administration of ketamine: a case report. J Med Case Rep 12(1):204

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Salem KMI, Goodger L, Bowyer K, Shafafy M, Grevitt MP (2016) Does transcranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) worsen seizures in epileptic patients following spinal deformity surgery? Eur Spine J 25(10):3044–3048

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang S, Zhuang Q, Zhang J, Tian Y, Zhao H, Wang Y et al (2016) Intra-operative MEP monitoring can work well in the patients with neural axis abnormality. Eur Spine J 25(10):3194–3200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mo AZ, Asemota AO, Venkatesan A, Ritzl EK, Njoku DB, Sponseller PD (2017) Why no signals? Cerebral anatomy predicts success of intraoperative neuromonitoring during correction of scoliosis secondary to cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 37(8):e451–e458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Qiu J, Li Y, Liu W, Zhu Z, Shi B, Liu Z et al (2021) Intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring in patients with dystrophic neurofibromatosis type 1 scoliosis. Somatosens Mot Res 38(2):95–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Srisooksai G, Mohamed BA, Martin PA, Blakemore LC, Seubert CN (2021) Transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring in a patient with a deep brain stimulator: a case report. J Clin Neurophysiol 38(1):e1-4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yellin JL, Wiggins CR, Franco AJ, Sankar WN (2016) Safe transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring during posterior spinal fusion in two patients with cochlear implants. J Clin Monit Comput 30(4):503–506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McKinney JL, Islam MP (2020) Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring (NIOM) in pediatric patients with polyneuropathy. Childs Nerv Syst 36(11):2801–2805

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang S, Zhang J, Tian Y, Shen J (2016) Rare true-positive outcome of spinal cord monitoring in patients under age 4 years. Spine J 16(9):1090–1094

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gavaret M, Pesenti S, Choufani E, Pennaroli D, Bollini G, Jouve JL (2016) Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring in children under 4 years old. Eur Spine J 25(6):1847–1854

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu T, Li QJ, Zhang XW, Wang Y, Jiang QY, Zhu XJ et al (2019) Multimodal intraoperative monitoring during surgical correction of scoliosis to avoid neurologic damage. Medicine 98(15):e15067

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gavaret M, Pesenti S, Diop-Sene MS, Choufani E, Bollini G, Jouve JL (2017) Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: lesional level diagnosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(1):33–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nassef M, Splinter W, Lidster N, Al-Kalbani A, Nashed A, Ilton S et al (2021) Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a retrospective observational study of new neurologic deficits. Can J Anesth Can Anesth 68(4):477–484

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jahangiri FR, Sayegh SA, Azzubi M, Alrajhi AM, Annaim MM, Al Sharif SA et al (2017) Benefit of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in a pediatric patient with spinal dysmorphism, split cord malformation, and scoliosis. Neurodiagnostic J 57(4):295–307

    Google Scholar 

  43. Krishnakumar R, Srivatsa N (2017) Multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring in scoliosis surgery: a two-year prospective analysis in a single centre. Neurol India 65(1):75–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Neira VM, Ghaffari K, Bulusu S, Moroz PJ, Jarvis JG, Barrowman N et al (2016) diagnostic accuracy of neuromonitoring for identification of new neurologic deficits in pediatric spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analg 123(6):1556–1566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not appplicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Center, 6 rue de Bellinière, 49800, Trélazé, France

    Audrey Angelliaume & Henry-François Parent

  2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Pellegrin University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France

    Toul-la Alhada, Julia Royer & Luke Harper

Authors
  1. Audrey Angelliaume
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toul-la Alhada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Henry-François Parent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julia Royer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luke Harper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrey Angelliaume.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no Conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angelliaume, A., Alhada, Tl., Parent, HF. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in scoliosis surgery: literature review of the last 10 years. Eur Spine J 32, 3072–3076 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07837-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07837-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation