Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiographic predictors for recurrence of lumbar symptoms after prioritized cervical surgery in patients with tandem spinal stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of the current study was to explore radiographic predictors for recurrence of lumbar symptoms after prioritized cervical surgery in patients with tandem spinal stenosis (TSS).

Methods

The current retrospective cohort study included 74 patients with TSS, who underwent prioritized cervical surgery. Based on presence or absence of improvement in lower limb symptoms, patients were grouped into improved and non-improved groups. Medical records and radiological parameters including age, sex, body mass index, cervical and lumbar parameters were analyzed. In improved group, patients were divided into relapsed and non-relapsed groups based on recurrence in lower limb symptoms.

Results

Lumbar symptoms improved in 70.1% (n = 52) of patients. Comparison between the improved and non-improved group showed that there were no statistically significant differences in cervical parameters while comparisons between the relapsed and non-relapsed groups showed significant differences in redundant nerve roots (RNRs) (p = 0.029), narrow segment (p = 0.042) and lumbar stenosis index (LSI) (p = 0.003). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LSI > 10 (p = 0.016) was independently associated with recurrence of lumbar symptoms.

Conclusions

Finding of the current study indicated that LSI > 10 was associated with recurrence of lumbar symptoms in TSS patients following cervical surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Overley SC, Kim JS, Gogel BA, Merrill RK, Hecht AC (2017) Tandem spinal stenosis: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 5(9):e2. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker JF (2020) Evaluation and treatment of tandem spinal stenosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 28(6):229–239. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagata K, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H, Ishimoto Y, Muraki S, Yamada H, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Akune T, Tanaka S, Nakamura K, Yoshida M (2017) The prevalence of tandem spinal stenosis and its characteristics in a population-based MRI study: the Wakayama Spine Study. Eur Spine J 26(10):2529–2535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5072-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li H, Chen Z, Li X, Liu T, Shen B, Huang Y, Wu D (2017) Prioritized cervical or lumbar surgery for coexisting cervical and lumbar stenosis: Prognostic analysis of 222 case. Int J Surg 44:344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamada T, Yoshii T, Yamamoto N, Hirai T, Inose H, Okawa A (2018) Surgical outcomes for lumbar spinal canal stenosis with coexisting cervical stenosis (tandem spinal stenosis): a retrospective analysis of 565 cases. J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0765-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawakita E, Kasai Y, Uchida A (2009) Low back pain and cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Orthop Surg 17(2):187–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900901700213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim CH, Chung CK, Lee U, Choi Y, Park SB, Jung JM, Hwang SH, Yang SH (2018) Postoperative changes in moderate to severe nonspecific low back pain after cervical myelopathy surgery. World Neurosurg 116:e429–e435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inoue T, Ando K, Kobayashi K, Nakashima H, Ito K, Katayama Y, Machino M, Kanbara S, Ito S, Yamaguchi H, Koshimizu H, Segi N, Kato F, Imagama S (2021) Primary cervical decompression surgery may improve lumbar symptoms in patients with tandem spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 30(4):899–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06693-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SH, Kim KT, Suk KS, Lee JH, Shin JH, So DH, Kwack YH (2010) Asymptomatic cervical cord compression in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a whole spine magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine 35(23):2057–2063. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f4588a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang Y, Lee JW, Koh YH, Hur S, Kim SJ, Chai JW, Kang HS (2011) New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(1):W134-140. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, Tansey R, Wardlaw D, Smith FW, Kulik G (2010) Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine 35(21):1919–1924. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jannelli G, Baticam NS, Tizi K, Truffert A, Lascano AM, Tessitore E (2020) Symptomatic tandem spinal stenosis: a clinical, diagnostic, and surgical challenge. Neurosurg Rev 43(5):1289–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01154-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iizuka H, Takahashi K, Tanaka S, Kawamura K, Okano Y, Oda H (2012) Predictive factors of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(5):607–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1465-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnan A, Dave BR, Kambar AK, Ram H (2014) Coexisting lumbar and cervical stenosis (tandem spinal stenosis): an infrequent presentation. Retrospective analysis of single-stage surgery (53 cases). Eur Spine J 23(1):64–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2868-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun WZ, Yan X, Yang YL, Song H, Xia ZW, Yang SC, Chen FL, Li WH, Yu ZQ, Liu B, Liu YX, Wang K, Zhang L (2021) Simultaneous or staged decompressions for patients with tandem spinal stenosis. Orthop Surg 13(4):1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12906

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cao J, Gao X, Yang Y, Lei T, Shen Y, Wang L, Tian Z (2021) Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02357-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo CA, Kaliya-Perumal AK, Lu ML, Chen LH, Chen WJ, Niu CC (2019) Staged surgery for tandem cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: Which should be treated first? Eur Spine J 28(1):61–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5795-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Felbaum DR, Fayed I, Stewart JJ, Sandhu FA (2016) Relief of lumbar symptoms after cervical decompression in patients with tandem spinal stenosis presenting with primarily lumbar pain. Cureus 8(12):e940. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.940

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Epstein NE, Epstein JA, Carras R, Murthy VS, Hyman RA (1984) Coexisting cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnosis and management. Neurosurgery 15(4):489–496. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198410000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bednarik J, Kadanka Z, Dusek L, Novotny O, Surelova D, Urbanek I, Prokes B (2004) Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical cord compression. Spine 29(20):2260–2269. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000142434.02579.84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kovalova I, Kerkovsky M, Kadanka Z, Kadanka Z Jr, Nemec M, Jurova B, Dusek L, Jarkovsky J, Bednarik J (2016) Prevalence and imaging characteristics of nonmyelopathic and myelopathic spondylotic cervical cord compression. Spine 41(24):1908–1916. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kadanka Z Jr, Adamova B, Kerkovsky M, Kadanka Z, Dusek L, Jurova B, Vlckova E, Bednarik J (2017) Predictors of symptomatic myelopathy in degenerative cervical spinal cord compression. Brain Behav 7(9):e00797. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.797

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee J, Koyanagi I, Hida K, Seki T, Iwasaki Y, Mitsumori K (2003) Spinal cord edema: unusual magnetic resonance imaging findings in cervical spondylosis. J Neurosurg 99(1 Suppl):8–13. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2003.99.1.0008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shin JJ, Jin BH, Kim KS, Cho YE, Cho WH (2010) Intramedullary high signal intensity and neurological status as prognostic factors in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir 152(10):1687–1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0692-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei L, Wei Y, Tian Y, Cao P, Yuan W (2020) Does three-grade classification of T2-weighted increased signal intensity reflect the severity of myelopathy and surgical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 43(3):967–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01106-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mittal S, Ahuja K, Sudhakar PV, Ifthekar S, Yadav G, Sarkar B, Kandwal P (2022) Simultaneous decompression of all stenotic regions versus decompression of only the most symptomatic region in patients with tandem spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 31(3):561–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07078-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weihua Cai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee and Internal Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Ye, W., Zhu, Y. et al. Radiographic predictors for recurrence of lumbar symptoms after prioritized cervical surgery in patients with tandem spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 31, 2769–2776 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07295-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07295-8

Keywords

Navigation