Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Morphometric measurements can improve prediction of progressive vertebral deformity following vertebral damage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A damaged vertebral body can exhibit accelerated ‘creep’ under constant load, leading to progressive vertebral deformity. However, the risk of this happening is not easy to predict in clinical practice. The present cadaveric study aimed to identify morphometric measurements in a damaged vertebral body that can predict a susceptibility to accelerated creep.

Methods

A total of 27 vertebral trabeculae samples cored from five cadaveric spines (3 male, 2 female, aged 36 to 73 (mean 57) years) were mechanically tested to establish the relationship between bone damage and residual strain. Compression testing of 28 human spinal motion segments (three vertebrae and intervening soft tissues) dissected from 14 cadaveric spines (10 male, 4 female, aged 67 to 92 (mean 80) years) showed how the rate of creep of a damaged vertebral body increases with increasing “damage intensity” in its trabecular bone. Damage intensity was calculated from vertebral body residual strain following initial compressive overload using the relationship established in the compression test of trabecular bone samples.

Results

Calculations from trabecular bone samples showed a strong nonlinear relationship between residual strain and trabecular bone damage intensity (R2 = 0.78, P < 0.001). In damaged vertebral bodies, damage intensity was then related to vertebral creep rate (R2 = 0.39, P = 0.001). This procedure enabled accelerated vertebral body creep to be predicted from morphological changes (residual strains) in the damaged vertebra.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that morphometric measurements obtained from fractured vertebrae can be used to quantify vertebral damage and hence to predict progressive vertebral deformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee SH, Kim ES, Eoh W (2011) Cement augmented anterior reconstruction with short posterior instrumentation: a less invasive surgical option for Kummell’s disease with cord compression. J Clin Neurosci 18:509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.07.139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muratore M, Ferrera A, Masse A, Bistolfi A (2018) Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: predictive factors for conservative treatment failure. Syst Review Eur Spine J 27:2565–2576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5340-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Luo J, Dolan P, Adams MA, Annesley-Williams DJ, Wang Y (2020) A predictive model for creep deformation following vertebral compression fractures. Bone 141:115595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Callaghan P, Szarko M, Wang Y, Luo J (2018) Effects of bone damage on creep behaviours of human vertebral trabeculae. Bone 106:204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kopperdahl DL, Pearlman JL, Keaveny TM (2000) Biomechanical consequences of an isolated overload on the human vertebral body. J Orthop Res 18:685–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100180502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernandez CJ, Lambers FM, Widjaja J, Chapa C, Rimnac CM (2014) Quantitative relationships between microdamage and cancellous bone strength and stiffness. Bone 66:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.05.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Larrue A, Rattner A, Peter ZA, Olivier C, Laroche N, Vico L, Peyrin F (2011) Synchrotron radiation micro-CT at the micrometer scale for the analysis of the three-dimensional morphology of microcracks in human trabecular bone. PLoS ONE 6:e21297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeytinoglu M, Jain RK, Vokes TJ (2017) Vertebral fracture assessment: Enhancing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis. Bone 104:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takahashi S, Hoshino M, Takayama K, Iseki K, Sasaoka R, Tsujio T, Yasuda H, Sasaki T, Kanematsu F, Kono H, Toyoda H, Nakamura H (2016) Predicting delayed union in osteoporotic vertebral fractures with consecutive magnetic resonance imaging in the acute phase: a multicenter cohort study. Osteoporos Int 27:3567–3575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3687-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo J, Annesley-Williams DJ, Adams MA, Dolan P (2017) How are adjacent spinal levels affected by vertebral fracture and by vertebroplasty? A biomechanical study on cadaveric spines. Spine J 17:863–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo J, Pollintine P, Gomm E, Dolan P, Adams MA (2012) Vertebral deformity arising from an accelerated “creep” mechanism. Eur Spine J 21:1684–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2279-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dolan P, Earley M, Adams MA (1994) Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. J Biomech 27:1237–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto E, Paul Crawford R, Chan DD, Keaveny TM (2006) Development of residual strains in human vertebral trabecular bone after prolonged static and cyclic loading at low load levels. J Biomech 39:1812–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T (1999) In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2468–74. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199912010-00008

  15. Adams MA, Dolan P, Hutton WC (1986) The stages of disc degeneration as revealed by discograms. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:36–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pollintine P, Dolan P, Tobias JH, Adams MA (2004) Intervertebral disc degeneration can lead to "stress-shielding" of the anterior vertebral body: a cause of osteoporotic vertebral fracture? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:774–82

  17. Green TP, Allvey JC, Adams MA (1994) Spondylolysis. Bending of the inferior articular processes of lumbar vertebrae during simulated spinal movements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2683–91

  18. Adams MA (1995) Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:2151–6

  19. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:755–62

  20. McKiernan F, Jensen R, Faciszewski T (2003) The dynamic mobility of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.1.24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Adams MA, Bogduk N, Burton K, Dolan P (2002) The biomechanics of back pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rimnac CM, Petko AA, Santner TJ, Wright TM (1993) The effect of temperature, stress and microstructure on the creep of compact bovine bone. J Biomech 26:219–28

  23. Lu X, Yang J, Zhu Z, Lv X, Wu J, Huang J, Yu L, Wen Z, Luo J, Wang Y (2020) Changes of the adjacent discs and vertebrae in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures treated with or without bone cement augmentation. Spine J 20:1048–55

  24. Lee SH, Lee SG, Son S, Kim WK (2014) Influence of Compression Ratio Differences between Magnetic Resonance Images and Simple Radiographs on Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Prognosis after Vertebroplasty. Korean J Spine 11:62–7. Doi:shttps://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2014.11.2.62

  25. Chen YJ, Lo DF, Chang CH, Chen HT, Hsu HC (2011) The value of dynamic radiographs in diagnosing painful vertebrae in osteoporotic compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:121–124. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Toyone T, Tanaka T, Wada Y, Kamikawa K, Ito M, Kimura K, Yamasita T, Matsushita S, Shiboi R, Kato D, Kaneyama R, Otsuka M (2006) Changes in vertebral wedging rate between supine and standing position and its association with back pain: a prospective study in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2963–6

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by research grants from Sir Halley Stewart Trust and Action Medical Research, UK [Grant numbers 0994, 1083, and 1161].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JL contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation. PD contributed to methodology, writing—reviewing and editing. MAA contributed to methodology, writing—reviewing and editing. DJAW contributed to conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Luo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study may be available from the authors on reasonable request.

Code availability

The code generated during the current study is available from the authors on reasonable request.

Ethics approval

This research has been conducted using experimental data from previous studies which had received ethics approval.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figures. 

Fig. 7
figure 7

Data from 27 trabecular bone samples showing the relationship between trabecular bone damage and residual strain assessed at 0.1 MPa

7,

Fig. 8
figure 8

The relationship between increased vertebral creep rate (\(\mathrm{ln}{\dot{\varepsilon }}_{c}-\mathrm{ln}{\dot{\varepsilon }}_{0}\)) and vertebral damage [\(-\mathrm{ln}\left(1-\omega \right)]\) based on data represented in Fig. 7. Mechanical test data were from 25 vertebral bodies. \({\dot{\varepsilon }}_{0}\) is the vertebral creep rate before damage, \({\dot{\varepsilon }}_{c}\) is the vertebral creep rate after damage, and \(\omega \) is the damage intensity derived from residual strain measured in the ramp loading/unloading cycle performed after compressive overload

8,

Fig. 9
figure 9

Data from 27 trabecular bone samples showing the relationship between trabecular bone damage and residual strain assessed at 0.3 MPa

9,

Fig. 10
figure 10

The relationship between increased vertebral creep rate (\(\mathrm{ln}{\dot{\varepsilon }}_{c}-\mathrm{ln}{\dot{\varepsilon }}_{0}\)) and vertebral damage [\(-\mathrm{ln}\left(1-\omega \right)]\) based on data represented in Figure 9. Mechanical test data were from 25 vertebral bodies. \({\dot{\varepsilon }}_{0}\) is the vertebral creep rate before damage, \({\dot{\varepsilon }}_{c}\) is the vertebral creep rate after damage, and \(\omega \) is the damage intensity derived from residual strain measured in the ramp loading/unloading cycle performed after compressive overload

10.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, J., Dolan, P., Adams, M.A. et al. Morphometric measurements can improve prediction of progressive vertebral deformity following vertebral damage. Eur Spine J 31, 70–78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07013-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07013-w

Keywords

Navigation