Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Histological examination of a retrieved custom-made 3D-printed titanium vertebra

Do the fine details obtained by additive manufacturing really promote osteointegration?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In the present report it is described the design, the manufacturing and the successful surgical implant of one of the first 3D custom titanium vertebra realized with Additive Manufacturing technique and its use for the spinal reconstruction after en-bloc resection for primary osteogenic sarcoma.

Methods

Clinical case presentation and the design of the 3D custom titanium vertebra was reported. It was also described the complex procedures adopted to evaluate the retrieved device from the histological point of view, as a tumor relapse hit the patient, one year after the reconstruction procedure.

Results

The histological evaluation confirmed that the resection technique exerts an important role in promoting bone formation: vertebral body osteotomies favored the reconstruction procedure and maximized the contact area between host bone/vertebral prosthesis thus favoring the bone tissue penetration and device colonization.

Conclusion

The sharing of these results is very important as they represent the starting point for improving the knowledge starting from the evidence obtained in a challenging clinical condition and with post-operative treatments that could be never reproduced in preclinical model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, Baldus C, Blanke K (1995) Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine 20(12):1410–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Antoni M, Charles YP, Walter A, Schuller S, Steib JP (2015) Fusion rates of different anterior grafts in thoracolumbar fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(9):E528–E533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boriani S, Gasbarrini A, Bandiera S, Ghermandi R, Lador R (2017) En bloc resections in the spine: The experience of 220 patients during 25 years. World Neurosurg 98:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Glennie RA, Rampersaud YR, Boriani S, Reynolds JJ, Williams R, Gokaslan ZL, Schmidt MH, Varga PP, Fisher CG (2016) A systematic review with consensus expert opinion of best reconstructive techniques after osseous en bloc spinal column tumor resection. Spine 41(20):S205–S211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim D, Lim JY, Shim KW, Han JW, Yi S, Yoon DH, Kim KN, Ha Y, Ji GY, Shin DA (2017) Sacral reconstruction with a 3D-printed implant after hemisacrectomy in a patient with sacral osteosarcoma: 1-year follow-up result. Yonsei Med J 58(2):453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choy WJ, Mobbs RJ, Wilcox B, Phan S, Phan K, Sutterlin CE 3rd (2017) Reconstruction of thoracic spine using a personalized 3D-Printed vertebral body in adolescent with t9 primary bone tumor. World Neurosurg 105:1032.e13-1032.e17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mobbs RJ, Coughlan M, Thompson R, Sutterlin CE 3rd, Phan K (2017) The utility of 3D printing for surgical planning and patient-specific implant design for complex spinal pathologies: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 26(4):513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wei R, Guo W, Ji T, Zhang Y, Liang H (2017) One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, custom-made prosthesis after total en bloc sacrectomy: a technical note. Eur Spine J 26(7):1902–1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Girolami M, Boriani S, Bandiera S, Barbanti-Bródano G, Ghermandi R, Terzi S, Tedesco G, Evangelisti G, Pipola V, Gasbarrini A (2018) Biomimetic 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis for anterior column reconstruction in the thoracolumbar spine: a tailored option following en bloc resection for spinal tumors: Preliminary results on a case-series of 13 patients. Eur Spine J 27(12):3073–3083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuadrado A, Yánez A, Martel O, Deviaene S, Monopoli D (2017) Influence of load orientation and of types of loads on the mechanical properties of porous Ti6Al4V biomaterials. Mater Des 135:309–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yánez A, Cuadrado A, Martel O, Afonso H, Monopoli D (2018) Gyroid porous titanium structures: a versatile solution to be used as scaffolds in bone defect reconstruction. Mater Des 140:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Izquierdo I, Santos L, Becerra J, Feito JM, Fernández D, Serrano MC, Díaz I, Fernández-Tomé B, Enciso S, Sánchez FM, Monopoli D, Afonso H, Portolés MT, Arcos D, Vallet M (2019) Synergistic effect of Si-hydroxyapatite coating and VEGF adsorption on Ti6Al4V-ELI scaffolds for bone regeneration in an osteoporotic bone environment. Acta Biomater 83:456–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA (1980) A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 153:106–120

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R (1997) Primary bone tumors of the spine terminology and surgical staging. Spine 22(9):1036–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yánez A, Fiorucci MP, Cuadrado A, Martel O, Monopoli D (2020) Surface roughness effects on the fatigue behaviour of gyroid cellular structures obtained by additive manufacturing. Int Jour Fatigue 138:105702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cambre KN, Francovich J, Julmi S, Safranski D, Guldberg RE, Maier H, Gall K (2019) Fatigue behavior of As-built selective laser melted titanium scaffolds with sheet-based gyroid microarchitecture for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 94:610–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang L, Mertens R, Ferrucci M, Yan C, Shi Y, Yang S (2019) Continuous graded gyroid cellular structures fabricated by selective laser melting: Design, manufacturing and mechanical properties. Mater Des 162:394–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yánez A, Herrera A, Martel O, Monopoli D, Afonso H (2016) Compressive behaviour of gyroid lattice structures for human cancellous bone implant applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 68:445–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maglio M, Salamanna F, Brogini S, Borsari V, Pagani S, NicoliAldini N, Giavaresi G, Fini M (2020) Histological Histomorphometrical, and Biomechanical Studies of Bone-Implanted Medical Devices: Hard Resin Embedding. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1804630

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cizek GR, Boyd LM (2000) Imaging pitfalls of interbody spinal implants. Spine 25(20):2633–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D (2018) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos B Eng 143:172–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Burnard JL, Parr WCH, Choy WJ, Walsh WR, Mobbs RJ (2020) 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices. Eur Spine J 29(7):1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Authors acknowledge the invaluable contribution of Cristiana Griffoni and Carlo Piovani for patient storage and data collection. This study contributed to the development of the Project by National Funding Organisations (Ministero della Salute – IMH) under the frame of EuroNanoMed III Project Next generation antibacterial nanostructured osseointegrated customized vertebral replacement – NANOVERTEBRA Joint Transnational call for proposals (JTC 2018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Sartori.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Donato Monopoli-Forleo is employed as a researcher for Canary Islands Institute of Technology.

All others authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Girolami, M., Sartori, M., Monopoli-Forleo, D. et al. Histological examination of a retrieved custom-made 3D-printed titanium vertebra. Eur Spine J 30, 2775–2781 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06926-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06926-w

Keywords

Navigation