Abstract
Purpose
Information regarding the impact of provider characteristics on perioperative outcomes in the spine surgery setting is limited. Existing studies primarily consider the impact of surgical provider volume. This analysis sought to identify the impact of anesthesiologist and surgeon volume and experience as well as anesthesia care team composition on adverse outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDF) and posterior lumbar fusions (PLF).
Methods
We identified 5900 patients who underwent ACDF or PLF procedures at a high-volume orthopedic institution from 2005 to 2014. Provider characteristics of interest were anesthesiologist and surgeon volume and experience along with anesthesia care team composition. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the outcomes of any complication, cardiopulmonary complication, and prolonged length of stay (> 7 days). Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine how much variation in outcomes could be explained by provider characteristics.
Results
There were no significant relationships between provider characteristics and perioperative outcomes among ACDF patients. Within the PLF cohort, surgeon annual case volume > 25 was associated with decreased odds of prolonged length of stay, while anesthesia resident involvement was associated with increased odds of prolonged length of stay. Surgeon characteristics explained the greatest proportion of variation in outcomes while anesthesiologist characteristics explained the least.
Conclusions
Anesthesia provider volume and experience did not significantly impact the odds of adverse outcome for ACDF and PLF patients. Higher surgeon volume was exclusively associated with decreased odds of prolonged length of stay following PLF. Further study is necessary to determine if these relationships persist in a less-specialized setting.
Graphic abstract
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shervin N, Rubash HE, Katz JN (2007) Orthopaedic procedure volume and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:35–41
Malik AT, Panni UY, Mirza MU, Tetlay M, Noordin S (2018) The impact of surgeon volume on patient outcome in spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 27:530–542
Paul JC, Lonner BS, Goz V, Weinreb J, Karia R, Toombs CS, Errico TJ (2015) Complication rates are reduced for revision adult spine deformity surgery among high-volume hospitals and surgeons. Spine J 15(9):1963–1972
Cole T, Veeravagu A, Zhang M, Ratliff JK (2017) Surgeon procedure volume and complication rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusions. Clin Spine Surg 30(5):E633–E639
Schoenfeld AJ, Serrano JA, Waterman BR, Bader JO, Belmont PJ (2013) The impact of resident involvement on post-operative morbidity and mortality following orthopaedic procedures: a study of 43,343 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(11):1483–1491
Dony P, Seidel L, Pirson M, Forget P (2019) Anaesthesia care team improves outcomes in surgical patients compared with solo anaesthesiologist: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 36(1):64–69
Pine M, Holt KD, Lou Y (2003) Surgical mortality and type of anesthesia provider. AANA J 71(2):109–116
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619
RStudio Team, (2016) RStudio: integrated development environment for R. RStudio Team, Boston
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team, Viennna
Yoshida K, Bohn J (2018) tableone: Create ‘Table 1’ to Describe Baseline Characteristics (Version 0.9.3)
Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S + to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform 12:77
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker B (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using {lme4}. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48
Lüdecke D (2018) sjstats: Statistical Functions for Regression Models (Version 0.17.1)
Dasenbrock HH, Clarke MJ, Witham TF, Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A (2012) The impact of provider volume on the outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurosurgery 70(6):1346–1354
Schoenfeld AJ, Sturgeon DJ, Burns CB, Hunt TJ, Bono CM (2018) Establishing benchmarks for the volume-outcome relationship for common lumbar spine surgical procedures. Spine J 18(1):22–28
Gani F, Kim Y, Weiss MJ, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL, Hirose K, Cameron JL, Wasey JO, Frank SM, Pawlik TM (2016) Effect of surgeon and anesthesiologist volume on surgical outcomes. J Surg Res 200(2):427–434
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Lauren A. Wilson, Megan Fiasconaro, Jashvant Poeran, Jiabin Liu, and Federico Girardi have no conflict of interest. Stavros G. Memtsoudis is a director on the boards of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) and the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine (SASM). He is a one-time consultant for Sandoz Inc. and Teikoku and the holder of US Patent ulticatheter Infusion System. US-2017-0361063. He is the owner of SGM Consulting, LLC and co-owner of FC Monmouth, LLC. None of the above relations influenced the conduct of the present study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, L.A., Fiasconaro, M., Poeran, J. et al. The impact of anesthesia and surgical provider characteristics on outcomes after spine surgery. Eur Spine J 28, 2112–2121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06055-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06055-5