Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part II: interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath—today’s perspective

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the second part of a paper on the relevance and significance of the Hippocratic Oath to modern medical ethical and moral values with the aim at answering questions on controversial issues related to the Oath. Part I argued that the general attributes and ethical values of the Oath are relevant to the modern world. Part II attempts to elucidate the interpretation of the specific injunctions of the Oath from today’s perspective in relation to ethical values concerning the duties of physicians to patients and society. The objective is to prove that the Oath has established the general context of medical ethics of the physician–patient relationship, which reflects long-lasting moral values that still define the medical profession. The Oath has exemplified the fundamental modern ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence and confidentiality. Its foremost message focuses on patients’ best interests and not on the prohibition of surgery, euthanasia or abortion, as is generally believed. Furthermore, the Oath as a code of professional identity has had a powerful impact on modem judicial opinions regarding medical ethics. In a lot of ways, it is as relevant of the values of contemporary medicine as it was for ancient medicine.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Translation by the authors of the Greek text: “ών τοίς θεοίς άνθρωπος εύχεται τυχείν της ευθανασίας κρείττον ουδέν εύχεται”.

References

  1. Askitopoulou H, Vgontzas AN (2017) The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5348-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scribonius Largus (1887) Scribonii Largi Conpositiones. Georgius Helmreich (ed). BG Teubner, Lipsiae, p 3

  3. Jones WHS (2004) The Doctor’s Oath: an essay in the history of medicine. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nutton V (1995) What’s in an Oath? J R Coll Physicians Lond 29:518–524

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones WHS (2004) General introduction. In: Page TE (ed) Hippocrates, vol I. Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Minar EL Jr (1945) The Hippocratic Oath: text, translation and interpretation by Ludwig Edelstein. Rev Am J Philol 66(1):105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Von Staden H (1996) “In a pure and holy way”. Personal and professional conduct in the Hippocratic Oath? J Hist Med Allied Sci 51(4):404–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hippocrates (2004) The Oath. In: Page TE (ed) WHS Jones (transl). vol I. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  9. Edelstein L (1987) The Hippocratic Oath: text, translation, and interpretation. In: Temkin O, Temkin CL (eds) Ancient medicine. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones WHS (2004) Introduction. In: Page TE (ed) Hippocrates. The Oath, vol I. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 291–297

  11. Carrick P (2001) Medical ethics in the ancient world. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  12. Veatch RM (1995) Medical codes and Oaths. In: Reich WT (ed) The encyclopedia of bioethics, vol 3. Simon & Shuster MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Plato (1924) Protagoras. In: Laches. Protagoras. Meno. Euthydemus. Lamb WRM (transl). Vol. II. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 311.b-c

  14. Hippocrates (2004) Precepts. In: Page TE (ed) Jones WHS (transl), vol I. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  15. Jouanna J (1999) Hippocrates. DeBevoise MB (transl). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press

  16. Beauchamp TL (1990) The promise of the beneficence model for medical ethics. J Contemp Health Law Policy 6(1):145–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983) Deciding to Forego Life Sustaining Treatment, pp 26–27

  18. Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC (1988) For the patient’s good: the restoration of beneficence in health care. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC (1987) The conflict between autonomy and beneficence in medical ethics: proposal for a resolution. J Contemp Health Law Policy 3:23–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. WMA Declaration of Geneva. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/. Accessed 15 Dec 2017

  21. European Court of Human Rights (2017) Case of Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal. Strasbourg, 19 December 2017, p 114

  22. Hippocrates (2004) Epidemics I. In: Page TE (ed) Jones WHS (transl), vol I. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  23. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2009) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jonsen AR (1978) Do no harm. Ann Int Med 88:827–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jonsen AR (2000) A short history of medical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yeager AL (2002) On Hippocrates. Either help or do not harm the patient. Letter. BMJ 325(7362):496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jonsen AR (2006) “Life is Short, Medicine is Long”. Reflections on a bioethical insight. J Med Philos 31:667–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Prioreschi P (1995) The Hippocratic Oath: a code for physicians, not a Pythagorean manifesto. Med Hypotheses 44(6):447–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Miles SH (2005) The Hippocratic Oath and the ethics of medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Posidippus Comicus (1880) Myrmex. In: Theodorus Koch (ed) Comicorum Atticorum Fragmenta, vol III. Novae Comoediae Fragmenta, Pars II. Aedipus BG Teubneri, Lipsiae, 1888, p 341 https://archive.org/stream/comicorumatticor03kockuoft#page/341/mode/1up. Accessed 3 Oct 2017

  31. Πετροπούλου Α (1996) Αρχαίες Πρακτικές Ευθανασίας: Κέα και Μασσαλία. Helios, σελ 9–29 [Petropoulou A (1996). Euthanasia by Opium or Hemlock: Keos, Athens and Massilia. Helios, pp 9–29]. https://helios-eie.ekt.gr/EIE/bitstream/10442/13191/1/M01.014.01.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2017

  32. Heraclides Lembus (1971) Excerpta Politiarum. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Monographs 5. Dilts MR (ed) Duke University Press, Durham, Section 29

  33. More T, Sampson G (1910) The Utopia of Sir Thomas More. George Sampson (ed) Ralph Robinson (transl). G. Bell and Sons, Ltd, London, p 401

  34. Bacon F (1654) De dignitate et augmentis scientiarum ad regem suum libri IX. JJ Bockenhofer (ed) Strassburg, pp 204–205

  35. Plato (1926) Laws. In: Henderson J (ed) Bury RG (transl). Vol. ΙI. Books 7–12. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Book XI.933d

  36. Αποστολίδης ΠΑ. Ιπποκράτειος Όρκος. Κώδικας Ηθικής ή Λίβελλος εναντίον των Ιατρών; Αθήνα: Στιγμή; 2000 [Apostolidis PA. Hippocratic Oath. Code of Ethics or Libel against the Doctors? Athens: Στιγμή; 2000]

  37. Davey LM (2001) The Oath of Hippocrates: a historical review. Neurosurgery 49:554–566

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hippocrates (2005) Nature of women. In: Potter P (ed & transl). Vol. X. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 302–303

  39. Aristotle (1984) The complete works of Aristotle. The revised Oxford translation. Barnes J (ed) Vol II. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 2119

  40. U.S. Supreme Court (1973) Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113. Argued December 13, 1971—Reargued October 11, 1972—Decided January 22, 1973

  41. Mulder T (2016) The Hippocratic Oath in Roe v. Wade. Eidolon Mar 10, pp 1–12 https://eidolon.pub/the-hippocratic-oath-in-roe-v-wade-ded59eedfd8f. Accessed 5 Jan 2018

  42. Hasday LR (2002) The Hippocratic Oath as literary text: a dialogue between law and medicine. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics 2(2):299–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Orr RD, Pang N, Pellegrino EJ et al (1997) Use of the Hippocratic Oath: a review of 20th century practice and a content analysis of oaths administered in medical schools in the U.S. and Canada in 1993. J Clin Ethics 8(4):374–385

    Google Scholar 

  44. Edelstein EJ, Edelstein L (1998) Asclepius, vol 1. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 177–178

    Google Scholar 

  45. European Court of Human Rights (1978) Case of König v. Germany. Strasbourg, 28 June 1978, p 45

  46. Bliquez LJ (2003) The Hippocratic surgical instrumentarium: a study in nomenclature. Med Secoli 15(3):403–439

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hippocrates (2005) Aphorisms. In: Goold JP (ed) Jones WHS (transl), vol IV. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 216–217

  48. Celsus AC (1991) On lithotomy, on medicine. In: Carmichael AG, Ratzan RM (eds) Medicine: a treasury of art and literature. Harkavy Publishing Service, New York, pp 39–40

    Google Scholar 

  49. Musitelli S (2002) Comment on the article “Operative Urology and the Hippocratic Oath”. De Historia Urologiae Europaeae. Eur Assoc Urol 9:163–164

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kass LR (1985) Is there a medical ethic? The Hippocratic Oath and the sources of ethical medicine. In: Kass LR (ed) Toward a more natural science: biology and human affairs. Free Press, New York, pp 235–236

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hippocrates (2004) Ancient medicine. In: Page TE (ed) Jones WHS (transl), vol I. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, section IX. 20-21

  52. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association (1991) Sexual misconduct in the practice of medicine. JAMA 226:2741–2745

    Google Scholar 

  53. Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence (2008) Clear sexual boundaries between healthcare professionals and patients: guidance for fitness to practise panels. London

  54. European Court of Human Rights (2004) Case of Éditions Plon v. France. Strasbourg, 18 May 2004

  55. Jotterand F (2005) The Hippocratic Oath and contemporary medicine: dialectic between past ideals and present reality? J Med Philos 30:107–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hippocrates (1998) Law. In: Page TE (ed) Jones WHS (transl), vol II. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 262–263

    Google Scholar 

  57. Supreme Court of the United States (2015) North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission. Argued October 14, 2014—Decided February 25, 2015, p 15

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their wholehearted sincere thanks and appreciation to Ms Iliana Antonakopoulou and Professor Eva Kalpourtzi for their valuable and constructive comments, and their continuous help and support with editing the present manuscript. They also wish to thank Mrs Pinelopi Stefanaki for her professional processing of the figures of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Askitopoulou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Askitopoulou, H., Vgontzas, A.N. The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part II: interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath—today’s perspective. Eur Spine J 27, 1491–1500 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5615-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5615-z

Keywords

Navigation