Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retrotransverse foramen of the atlas: prevalence and bony variations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the prevalence of the retrotransverse foramen (RTF) and its bony variations.

Methods

One hundred ten atlases of living adult subjects, 161 twentieth century dry adult cervical atlases and four dry adult cervical atlases from medieval skeletons were studied to detect the RTF and its abnormal bony variations. The 110 living adult subjects underwent a computed tomography study to detect the RTF.

Results

In the in vivo sample (n = 110; 100%), the RTF was found in four (3.6%) atlases. It was bilateral in all cases, but three (2.7%) patients showed complete RTF and the other patient presented a complete RTF in the left transverse process and an unclosed RTF in the right transverse process. In addition, the RTF was observed in combination with an unclosed transverse foramen in two cases (1.8%). In the twentieth century skeletal sample (n = 206; 100%) the RTF was found in 15 (7.3%) C1 vertebrae. It was bilateral in three (1.5%) vertebrae and unilateral in another 12 (5.8%) vertebrae. In the medieval skeletal sample (n = 4; 100%) one cadaveric atlas (25%) presented a bilateral RTF with special bony characteristics which presented an unexpected spicula in the left RTF.

Conclusions

The RTF is a nonmetric variant of the atlas vertebra that can present non-degenerative and non-traumatic spiculae or it can be unclosed. In addition, it can be associated with the presence of unclosed transverse foramina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Le Minor JM (1997) The retrotransverse foramen of the human atlas vertebra. A distinctive variant within primates. Acta Anat (Basel) 160:208–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Paraskevas G, Papaziogas B, Tsonidis C, Kapetanos G (2005) Gross morphology of the bridges over the vertebral artery groove on the atlas. Surg Radiol Anat 27:129–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodon G, Grimm A, Hirt B, Seifarth H, Barsa P (2016) Applied anatomy of screw placement via the posterior arch of the atlas and anatomy-based refinements of the technique. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26:793–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Quiles-Guiñau L, Gómez-Cabrero A, Miquel-Feucht M, Aparicio A (2016) Retrotransverse foramen in atlas vertebrae of the late 17th and 18th centuries. IJAE 121:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  5. Veleanu C, Bârzu S, Pánescu S, Udroiu C (1977) Retro transverse groove or canal of atlas and its significance. Acta Anat 97:400–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta SC, Gupta CD, Arora AK, Maheshwari BB (1979) The retrotransverse groove/canal in Indian atlas vertebrae. Anat Anz 145:514–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilodi AK, Gupta SC (2005) Presence of retro transverse groove or canal in atlas vertebrae. J Anat Soc India 54:16–18

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karau PB, Ogengo JA, Hassanali J, Odula P (2010) Anatomy and prevalence of atlas vertebrae bridges in a Kenyan population: an osteological study. Clin Anat 23:649–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Travan L, Saccheri P, Gregoraci G, Mardegan C, Crivellato E (2015) Normal anatomy and anatomic variants of vascular foramens in the cervical vertebrae: a paleo-osteological study and review of the literature. Anat Sci Int 90:308–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paraskevas GK, Tsitsopoulos PP, Ioannidis OM (2013) Incidence and purpose of the clival canal, a “neglected” skull base canal. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:139–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elliott RE, Tanweer O (2014) The prevalence of the ponticulus posticus (arcuate foramen) and its importance in the Goel–Harms procedure: meta-analysis and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 82:E335–E343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wight S, Osborne N, Breen AC (1999) Incidence of ponticulus posterior of the atlas in migraine and cervicogenic headache. J Manip Physiol Ther 22:15–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cushing KE, Ramesh V, Gardner-Medwin D, Todd NV, Gholkar A, Baxter P, Griffiths PD (2001) Tethering of the vertebral artery in the congenital arcuate foramen of the atlas vertebra: a possible cause of vertebral artery dissection in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 43:491–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Split W, Sawrasewicz-Rybak M (2002) Character of headache in Kimmerle anomaly. Headache 42:911–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chitroda PK, Katti G, Baba IA, Najmudin M, Ghali SR, Kalmath BGV (2013) Ponticulus posticus on the posterior arch of atlas, prevalence analysis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients of Gulbarga population. J Clin Diagn Res 7:3044–3047

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabir H, Kumbhare S, Rout P (2014) Evaluation of ponticulus posticus on digital lateral cephalograms and cone beam computed tomography in patients with migraine and healthy individuals: a comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med oral Pathol Oral Radiol 118:348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ríos L, Mata-Escolano F, Blanco-Pérez E, Llido S, Bastir M, Sanchis-Gimeno JA (2017) Acute headache attributed to whiplash in arcuate foramen and non-arcuate foramen subjects. Eur Spine J 26:1262–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Le Minor JM, Trost O (2004) Bony ponticles of the atlas (C1) over the groove for the vertebral artery in humans and primates: polymorphism and evolutionary trends. Am J Phys Anthropol 125:16–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moisi M, Fisahn C, Tkachenko L, Jeyamohan S, Reintjes S, Grunert P, Norvell DC, Tubbs RS, Page J, Newell DW, Nora P, Oskouian RJ, Chapman J (2017) Posterior arch C-1 screw technique: a cadaveric comparison study. J Neurosurg Spine 17:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  20. Billmann F, Le Minor JM (2009) Transverse foramen of the atlas (C1) anteriorly unclosed: a misknown human variant and its evolutionary significance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E422–E426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Perez-Bermejo M, Rios L, Llido S, Bastir M, Blanco-Perez E, Mata-Escolano F (2017) Analysis of the relationship between the double transverse foramen and the possibility of developing clinical symptoms after whiplash. Clin Anat 30:761–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Mr. Francesc Xavier Duarte Martinez and Mr. Luis Lozano Perez, heads of the archeological intervention at the Almudin Square in Segorbe, Mr. Vicente Palomar-Macian, head of the Museo Municipal de Arqueología y Etnología de Segorbe, and Mr. Alfred Sanchis and the staff of the Servicio de Investigación Prehistórica (SIP) del Museo de Prehistoria de Valencia for their technical assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. We also wish to thank the Dirección General De Cultura y Patrimonio de la Conselleria de Educación, Investigación, Cultura y Deporte de la Comunidad Valenciana.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan A. Sanchis-Gimeno.

Ethics declarations

Sources of support

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanchis-Gimeno, J.A., Blanco-Perez, E., Perez-Bermejo, M. et al. Retrotransverse foramen of the atlas: prevalence and bony variations. Eur Spine J 27, 1272–1277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5372-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5372-4

Keywords

Navigation