Abstract
Purpose
The NeckPix© is a simple and rapid means of measuring the beliefs of subjects with chronic neck pain concerning pain-related fears of a specific set of activities of daily living. The original version showed satisfactory psychometric properties. This observational study is aimed at evaluating its responsiveness and minimal important changes (MICs) in subjects with chronic neck pain.
Methods
At the beginning, at the end of an 8-week rehabilitation programme as well as at the one-year follow-up, 153 subjects completed the NeckPix©. After the programme and at follow-up, subjects and physiotherapists also completed the global perceived effect (GPE) scale, which was divided to produce a dichotomous outcome. Responsiveness was calculated by distribution [effect size (ES); standardised response mean (SRM)] and anchor-based methods [receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves; correlations between change scores of the NeckPix© and GPEs]. ROC curves were also used to compute MICs.
Results
The ES ranged from 0.95 to 1.26 and the SRM from 0.84 to 0.98 at post-treatment and follow-up based on subjects’ and physiotherapists’ perspective. The ROC analyses revealed AUCs of 0.89 and 0.97 at post-treatment and follow-up, respectively; MICs (sensitivity; specificity) were of 6 (0.82; 0.88) and 8 (0.80; 0.92) at post-treatment and of 8 (0.95; 0.90 based on subjects and 0.95; 0.92 based on physiotherapists perspective) at follow-up. The correlations between change scores of the NeckPix© and GPEs ranged from −0.69 to −0.82.
Conclusions
The NeckPix© was sensitive in detecting clinical changes in subjects with chronic neck pain undergoing rehabilitation. We recommend taking the MICs provided into account when assessing subjects’ improvement or planning studies in this clinical context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jensen IB, Bergström G, Ljungquist T, Bodin L (2005) A 3-year follow-up of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for back and neck pain. Pain 115:273–283
Johansen JB, Røe C, Bakke ES et al (2013) The determinants of function and disability in neck patients referred to a specialized outpatient clinic. Clin J Pain 29:1029–1035
Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Rocca B, et al (2016) Group-based multimodal exercises integrated with cognitive-behavioural therapy improve disability, pain and quality of life of subjects with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial with one-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil 269215516651979
Monticone M, Cedraschi C, Ambrosini E et al (2015) Cognitive‐behavioural treatment for subacute and chronic neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (5):CD010664. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010664.pub2
Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, Van Eek H (1995) Fear of movement/(re) injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 62:363–372
Vlaeyen JW, de Jong J, Geilen M et al (2002) The treatment of fear of movement/(re) injury in chronic low back pain: further evidence on the effectiveness of exposure in vivo. Clin J Pain 18:251–261
Leeuw M, Goossens ME, van Breukelen GJ et al (2007) Measuring perceived harmfulness of physical activities in patients with chronic low back pain: the photograph series of daily activities—short electronic version. J Pain 8:840–849
Monticone M, Vernon H, Brunati R et al (2015) The NeckPix©: development of an evaluation tool for assessing kinesiophobia in subjects with chronic neck pain. Eur Spine J 24:72–79
Saltychev M, Mattie R, McCormick Z, Laimi K (2017) Psychometric properties of the neck disability index amongst patients with chronic neck pain using item response theory. Disabil Rehabil 1–6
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42
de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW et al (2006) Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:54
Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR et al (2016) How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set”–a practical guideline. Trials 17:449
Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53:459–468
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL et al (2010) The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 10:22
Nordin M, Carragee EJ, Hogg-Johnson S et al (2009) Assessment of neck pain and its associated disorders: results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 32:S117–S140
Monticone M, Baiardi P, Vanti C et al (2012) Chronic neck pain and treatment of cognitive and behavioural factors: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur Spine J 21:1558–1566
Kamper SJ, Ostelo RW, Knol DL et al (2010) Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol 63(760–766):e1
Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J (2008) Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 61:102–109
Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39:561–577
Atkinson G, Nevill A (1997) Comment on the use of concordance correlation to assess the agreement between two variables. JSTOR
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 837–845
DeVet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL (2011) Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lemeunier N, da Silva-Oolup S, Chow N, et al (2017) Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess the anatomical integrity of the cervical spine in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 1—a systematic review from the cervical assessment and diagnosis research evaluation (CADRE) collaboration. Eur Spine J 1–17
Groeneweg R, Haanstra T, Bolman CA et al (2017) Treatment success in neck pain: the added predictive value of psychosocial variables in addition to clinical variables. Scand J Pain 14:44–52
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the patients and the physiotherapists who took part in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monticone, M., Frigau, L., Vernon, H. et al. Responsiveness and minimal important change of the NeckPix© in subjects with chronic neck pain undergoing rehabilitation. Eur Spine J 27, 1324–1331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5343-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5343-9