Skip to main content
Log in

Hemivertebra resection with posterior unilateral intervertebral fusion and transpedicular fixation for congenital scoliosis: results with at least 3 years of follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The main treatment for congenital scoliosis is posterior hemivertebra resection with bilateral transpedicular fixation. Reports describing posterior unilateral intervertebral fusion and transpedicular screw fixation are rare, with no long-term follow-up results, especially in older children. Retrospective analysis of the long-term outcomes of unilateral fusion and fixation after hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis.

Methods

From April 2004 to May 2012, 19 consecutive cases (12 males; age range 2.3–13.4 years) of congenital scoliosis treated by hemivertebra resection with posterior unilateral or bilateral exposure and unilateral intervertebral fusion with transpedicular screw instrumentation alone were investigated retrospectively. All cases were followed-up for at least 3 years.

Results

The mean Cobb angle of the segmental scoliosis was improved from 34.8 to 13.4° (correction rate 61.5 %). The mean Cobb angle of the segmental kyphosis was improved from 23.5 to 5.8° (correction rate 75.3 %). The mean correction rates of compensatory cranial and caudal curves were 46.1 and 54.5 %, respectively. 11 patients (57.8 %) exhibited continuous segmental curve improvement during the follow-up. One pedicle fracture and one instrumentation failure were recorded.

Conclusions

Unilateral transpedicular screw fixation provides satisfactory correction of the spinal deformity in both very young and older children. Unilateral intervertebral fusion and transpedicular fixation represents an advisable alternative method for the correction of congenital scoliosis and has advantages of reduced trauma, less surgery time and lower expense. Furthermore, the non-fused concave side offers the opportunity for correction of subsequent spine deformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Royle ND (1928) The operative removal of an accessory vertebra. Med J Aust 1:387–391

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergoin M, Bollini G, Taibi L, Cohen G (1986) Excision of hemivertebrae in children with congenital scoliosis. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 12:179–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 14:717–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Callahan BC, Georgopoulos G, Eilert RE (1997) Hemivertebral excision for congenital scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 17:96–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holte DC, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F (1995) Excision of hemivertebrae and wedge resection in the treatment of congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg (American volume) 77:159–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. King JD, Lowery GL (1991) Results of lumbar hemivertebral excision for congenital scoliosis. Spine 16:778–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leatherman K, Dickson R (1979) Two-stage corrective surgery for congenital deformities of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 61:324–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Slabaugh PB, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Moe JH (1980) Lumbosacral hemivertebrae. A review of twenty-four patients, with excision in eight. Spine 5:234–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shono Y, Abumi K, Kaneda K (2001) One-stage posterior hemivertebra resection and correction using segmental posterior instrumentation. Spine 26:752–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruf M, Harms J (2002) Hemivertebra resection by a posterior approach: innovative operative technique and first results. Spine 27:1116–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruf M, Jensen R, Letko L, Harms J (2009) Hemivertebra resection and osteotomies in congenital spine deformity. Spine 34:1791–1799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura H, Matsuda H, Konishi S, Yamano Y (2002) Single-stage excision of hemivertebrae via the posterior approach alone for congenital spine deformity: follow-up period longer than 10 years. Spine 27:110–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Polly DW Jr, Rosner MK, Monacci W, Moquin RR (2003) Thoracic hemivertebra excision in adults via a posterior-only approach: report of two cases. Neurosurg Focus 14:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ginsburg G, Mulconrey DS, Browdy J (2007) Transpedicular hemiepiphysiodesis and posterior instrumentation as a treatment for congenital scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 27:387–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedequist D, Emans J, Proctor M (2009) Three rod technique facilitates hemivertebra wedge excision in young children through a posterior only approach. Spine 34:E225–E229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yaszay B, O’Brien M, Shufflebarger HL, Betz RR, Lonner B, Shah SA, Boachie-Adjei O, Crawford A, Letko L, Harms J, Gupta MC, Sponseller PD, Abel MF, Flynn J, Macagno A, Newton PO (2011) Efficacy of hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis: a multicenter retrospective comparison of three surgical techniques. Spine 36:2052–2060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruf M, Harms J (2003) Posterior hemivertebra resection with transpedicular instrumentation: early correction in children aged 1–6 years. Spine 28:2132–2138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bollini G, Docquier P-L, Viehweger E, Launay F, Jouve J-L (2006) Lumbar hemivertebra resection. J Bone Joint Surg 88:1043–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klemme WR, Polly DW, Orchowski JR (2001) Hemivertebral excision for congenital scoliosis in very young children. J Pediatr Orthop 21:761–764

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang DG, Kim JH, Ha KY, Lee JS, Jang JS, Suk SI (2015) Posterior hemivertebra resection and short segment fusion with pedicle screw fixation for congenital scoliosis in children younger than 10 years: greater than 7-year follow-up. Spine 40:E484–E491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Shengru W, Qiu G, Yu B, Yipeng W, Luk KD (2011) The efficacy and complications of posterior hemivertebra resection. Eur Spine J 20:1692–1702

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhuang Q, Zhang J, Li S, Wang S, Guo J, Qiu G (2015) One-stage posterior-only lumbosacral hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion: a more than 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. [Epub ahead of print]

  23. Wang S, Zhang J, Qiu G, Li S, Yu B, Weng X (2013) Posterior hemivertebra resection with bisegmental fusion for congenital scoliosis: more than 3 year outcomes and analysis of unanticipated surgeries. Eur Spine J 22:387–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li XF, Liu ZD, Hu GY, Chen B, Zhong GB, Zang WP, Wang HT (2011) Posterior unilateral pedicle subtraction osteotomy of hemivertebra for correction of the adolescent congenital spinal deformity. Spine 11:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Lv Zhi for language editing and Luo Xue’e for statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Hai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no actual or potential conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, Y., Hai, Y., Zhao, S. et al. Hemivertebra resection with posterior unilateral intervertebral fusion and transpedicular fixation for congenital scoliosis: results with at least 3 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 25, 3274–3281 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4556-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4556-7

Keywords

Navigation