Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naïve spinal surgeons

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aims of this study were (1) to demonstrate the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system can be reliably applied by an international group of surgeons and (2) to delineate those injury types which are difficult for spine surgeons to classify reliably.

Methods

A previously described classification system of thoracolumbar injuries which consists of a morphologic classification of the fracture, a grading system for the neurologic status and relevant patient-specific modifiers was applied to 25 cases by 100 spinal surgeons from across the world twice independently, in grading sessions 1 month apart. The results were analyzed for classification reliability using the Kappa coefficient (κ).

Results

The overall Kappa coefficient for all cases was 0.56, which represents moderate reliability. Kappa values describing interobserver agreement were 0.80 for type A injuries, 0.68 for type B injuries and 0.72 for type C injuries, all representing substantial reliability. The lowest level of agreement for specific subtypes was for fracture subtype A4 (Kappa = 0.19). Intraobserver analysis demonstrated overall average Kappa statistic for subtype grading of 0.68 also representing substantial reproducibility.

Conclusion

In a worldwide sample of spinal surgeons without previous exposure to the recently described AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System, we demonstrated moderate interobserver and substantial intraobserver reliability. These results suggest that most spine surgeons can reliably apply this system to spine trauma patients as or more reliably than previously described systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AOSpine International (2014) AOSpine classification for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine tutorial. http://www.aovideo.ch/external/AOSCT/. Accessed 11 Nov 2013

  2. Bailey CS, Urquhart JC, Dvorak MF, Nadeau M, Boyd MC, Thomas KC, Kwon BK, Gurr KR, Bailey SI, Fisher CG (2014) Orthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic injury: a multicenter prospective randomized equivalence trial. Spine J 14(11):2557–2564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrop JS, Vaccaro AR, Hurlbert RJ, Wilsey JT, Baron EM, Shaffrey CI, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF, Oner FC, Wood KB, Anand N, Anderson DG, Lim MR, Lee JY, Bono CM, Arnold PM, Rampersaud YR, Fehlings MG, Spine Trauma Study Group (2006) Intrarater and interrater reliability and validity in the assessment of the mechanism of injury and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex: a novel injury severity scoring system for thoracolumbar injuries. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting On Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2005. J Neurosurg Spine 4:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hauptfleisch J, Meagher TM, King D, Lopez de Heredia L, Hughes RJ (2013) Out-of-hours MRI provision in the UK and models of service delivery. Clin Radiol 68:e245–e248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly JC, O’Briain DE, Kelly GA, Mc Cabe JP (2012) Imaging the spine for tumour and trauma—a national audit of practice in Irish hospitals. Surgeon 10:80–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oner FC, Ramos LM, Simmermacher RK, Kingma PT, Diekerhof CH, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (2002) Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility. A study of 53 patients using CT and MRI. Eur Spine J 11:235–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Reinhold M, Audige L, Schnake KJ, Bellabarba C, Dai LY, Oner FC (2013) AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 22:2184–2201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rihn JA, Yang N, Fisher C, Saravanja D, Smith H, Morrison WB, Harrop J, Vacaro AR (2010) Using magnetic resonance imaging to accurately assess injury to the posterior ligamentous complex of the spine: a prospective comparison of the surgeon and radiologist. J Neurosurg Spine 12:391–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmid R, Krappinger D, Seykora P, Blauth M, Kathrein A (2010) PLIF in thoracolumbar trauma: technique and radiological results. Eur Spine J 19:1079–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmid R, Lindtner RA, Lill M, Blauth M, Krappinger D, Kammerlander C (2012) Combined posteroanterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Injury 43:475–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schnake KJ, Stavridis SI, Kandziora F (2014) Five-year clinical and radiological results of combined anteroposterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures. J Neurosurg Spine 20:497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, Harrop J, Dvorak M, Wood K, Fehlings MG, Fisher C, Zeiller SC, Anderson DG, Bono CM, Stock GH, Brown AK, Kuklo T, Oner FC (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2325–2333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C, Reinhold M, Aarabi B, Kandziora F, Chapman J, Shanmuganathan R, Fehlings M, Vialle L, Forum AOSpine Spinal Cord Injury and Trauma Knowledge (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine 38:2028–2037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whang PG, Vaccaro AR, Poelstra KA, Patel AA, Anderson DG, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Ratliff JK, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson P, Aarabi B, Sekhon LH, Gahr R, Carrino JA (2007) The influence of fracture mechanism and morphology on the reliability and validity of two novel thoracolumbar injury classification systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:791–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wood KB, Khanna G, Vaccaro AR, Arnold PM, Harris MB, Mehbod AA (2005) Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1423–1429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

AOSpine is a clinical division of the AO Foundation—an independent medically guided not for profit organization. The AO has a strong financial independence thanks to the foundations endowment. The annual operating activities are financed through three pillars: Collaboration and support agreements with DePuy Synthes and other industrial partners, return on own financial assets and other third party income (e.g. participant fees, R&D projects, memberships).

The AOSpine Knowledge Forums are pathology focused working groups acting on behalf of AOSpine in their domain of scientific expertise. Each forum consists of a steering committee of up to 10 international spine experts who meet biannually to discuss research, assess the best evidence for current practices and formulate clinical trials to advance their field of spine expertise. Authors are compensated for their travel and accommodation costs. Study support is provided directly through AOSpine’s Research department and AO’s Clinical Investigation and Documentation unit. There are no other institutional subsidies, corporate affiliations or funding sources supporting this work unless clearly documented and disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory D. Schroeder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kepler, C.K., Vaccaro, A.R., Koerner, J.D. et al. Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naïve spinal surgeons. Eur Spine J 25, 1082–1086 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3765-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3765-9

Keywords

Navigation