Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness and safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with previous laminectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for revision lumbar spine surgery in patients with previous laminectomy. The secondary objective was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome after such a procedure.

Methods

Retrospective case series study. Eighty-two patients were included. There were 48 women (58.5 %) and 34 men (41.5 %) with a mean age of 51 years (range 26–84) at the time of index procedure. The outpatient and inpatient charts were reviewed to identify patients’ demographic data, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data. The outcome measures were assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. An independent spine surgeon and musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed the imaging studies.

Results

The average operative time was 160 min (range 131–250). The average estimated blood loss was 652 cc (100–1,400 cc). Nineteen patients (23.1 %) required blood transfusion. Five patients (6 %) had dural tear. One patient (1.2 %) had a surgical site infection. Two patients (2.4 %) had thromboembolic events. The average hospital stay was 3.8 days (2–5 days). At a mean follow-up of 28 months, there were statically significant improvement in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain. None of the patients’ radiographs showed hardware failure or pedicle screw loosening and no patient returned to the operating room for pseudarthrosis.

Conclusions

The current study confirmed that TLIF approach in patients with previous laminectomy is effective and safe with good outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guyer RD, Patterson M, Ohnmeiss DD (2006) Failed back surgery syndrome: diagnostic evaluation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:534–543

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elgafy H, Vaccaro AR, Chapman JR, Dvorak MF (2012) Rationale of revision lumbar spine surgery. Global Spine J 2(1):7–14

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrick WT, Schofferman JA, Reynolds JB et al (2000) Anterior lumbar fusion improves discogenic pain at levels of prior posterolateral fusion. Spine 2:853–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hee HT, Castro FP Jr, Majd ME, Holt RE, Myers L (2001) Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord 14(6):533–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA, Raley E, DeBauche S, Shucosky E, Chotikul L (2010) Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine 35:S302–S311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harms JG, Jeszenszky D (1998) The unilateral transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Traumatol 6:88–89

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD (1993) A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion: two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine 18:2106–2117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bullis D et al (1992) Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 5:433–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodríguez-Vela J, Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Muñoz-Marín J, Herrera A, Velilla J (2013) Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 22:2857–2863

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB (2012) Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21:2265–2270

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, Gerszten PC, Moossy JJ, Kanter AS, Spiro RM, Okonkwo DO (2012) Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg Spine 16(1):44–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brau SA, Delamarter RB, Schiffman ML, Williams LA, Watkins RG (2004) Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery. Spine J 4:409–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fantini GA, Pappou IP, Girardi FP, Sandhu HS, Cammisa FP (2007) Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management. Spine 32:2751–2758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen FB, Bunger CE (1997) Retrograde ejaculation after retroperitoneal lower lumbar interbody fusion. Int Orthop 21:176–180

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aichmair A, Fantini GA, Garvin S, Beckman J, Girardi FP (2013) Aortic perforation during lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech. [Epub ahead of print]

  16. Lykissas MG, Aichmair A, Sama AA, Hughes AP, Lebl DR, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP (2014) Nerve injury and recovery after lateral lumbar interbody fusion with and without bone morphogenetic protein-2 augmentation: a cohort-controlled study. Spine J. 14(2):217–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Taher F, Hughes AP, Lebl DR, Sama AA, Pumberger M, Aichmair A, Huang RC, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP (2013) Contralateral motor deficits after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 38:1959–1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taher F, Lebl DR, Hughes AP, Girardi FP (2013) Contralateral psoas seroma after transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein-2 implantation. Spine J. 13:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tafazal SI, Sell PJ (2005) Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: incidence and management. Eur Spine J 14:287–290

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Sangani PK, Parvataneni HK, Cadag S, Sandhu HS (2000) Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine 25:2663–2667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salehi SA, Tawk R, Ganju A, LaMarca F, Liu JC, Ondra SL (2004) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients. Neurosurgery 54:368–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Faundez AA, Schwender JD, Safriel Y, Gilbert TJ, Mehbod AA, Denis F, Transfeldt EE, Wroblewski JM (2009) Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior–posterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients. Eur Spine J 18:203–211

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara R, Thramann JJ (2006) Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumber interbody fusion versus anterior–posterior reconstruction for lumbar dis degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 2:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng F, Cammisa FP, Sandhu HS, Girardi FP, Khan SN (2002) Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Spine 27:818–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Elgafy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elgafy, H., Olson, D., Liu, J. et al. Effectiveness and safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with previous laminectomy. Eur Spine J 24, 810–816 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3726-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3726-8

Keywords

Navigation