Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in spino-pelvic alignment after surgical treatment of high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis by a posterior approach: a report of 41 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze changes in spino-pelvic parameters (SPPs) after surgery of high-grade lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis (HDIS).

Methods

We analyzed 41 patients affected by HDIS operated upon by attempt of reduction and posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw systems with or without interbody fusion. Pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and sacral slope (SS) were measured, and patients were further divided into balanced and unbalanced pelvis subgroups.

Results

SS passed from 46.8° ± 9.8° preoperatively to 50.1° ± 10.1° (p = 0.02). PT passed from 26.7° ± 6.7° preoperatively to 22.9° ± 7.5° (p = 0.003). Unbalanced patients showed significantly higher PT and lower SS compared to the balanced patients preoperatively, and these corrected after surgery. Patients with instrumentation failure (n = 5) had significant increase in PT values postoperatively (p = 0.018).

Conclusions

We confirmed the positive effect of surgery on the SPPs in patients affected by HDIS, which showed different patterns of corrections with surgery for balanced and unbalanced pelvis patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeWald RL (1997) Spondylolisthesis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald R (eds) Texbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1201–1209

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agabegi SS, Fischgrund JS (2010) Contemporary management of isthmic spondylolisthesis: pediatric and adult. Spine J 10:530–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganju A (2002) Isthmic spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg focus 13:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beutler WJ, Fredrickson BE, Murtland A, Sweeney CA, Grant WD, Baker D (2003) The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1027–1035

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bourghli A, Aunoble S, Reebye O, Le Huec JC (2011) Correlation of clinical outcome and spinopelvic sagittal alignment after surgical treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 20:663–668

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hensinger RN, Lang JR, MacEwen GD (1976) Surgical management of spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Faldini C, Di Martino A, De Fine M, Miscione MT, Calamelli C, Mazzotti A, Perna F (2013) Current classification systems for adult degenerative scoliosis. Musculoskel Surg 97:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hresko MT, Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E (2007) Classification of high-grade spondylolistheses based on pelvic version and spine balance: possible rationale for reduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2208–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mac-Thiong JM, Wang Z, de Guise JA, Labelle H (2008) Postural model of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment and its relevance for lumbosacral developmental spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2316–2325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubousset J (1997) Treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res 337:77–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud É, Guigui P (2010) Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of seven hundred nine Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E1193–E1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martiniani M, Lamartina C, Specchia N (2012) “In situ” fusion or reduction in high-grade high dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis (HDSS). Eur Spine J 21:134–140

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N et al (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9:47–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hresko MT, Hirschfeld R, Buerk AA, Zurakowski D (2009) The effect of reduction and instrumentation of spondylolisthesis on spinopelvic sagittal alignment. J Pediatr Orthop 29:157–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DeWald CJ, Vartabedian JE, Rodts MF, Hammerberg KW (2005) Evaluation and management of high-grade spondylolisthesis in adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(6):S49–S59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamartina C (2001) A square to indicate the unstable zone in severe spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 10:444–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lonstein JE (1999) Spondylolisthesis in children: cause, natural history, and management. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 24:2640–2648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Erfani MA, Pourabbas B, Nouraie H, Vadiee I, Vosoughi AR (2014) Results of fusion and instrumentation of thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures in children: a prospective ten-year study. Musculoskelet Surg 98(2):107–114 (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bradford DS (1979) Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis: a combined approach for reduction and stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 4:423–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Poussa M, Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, Ylikoski M, Hurri H, Österman K (1993) Surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents: reduction or fusion in situ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:894–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Ungacta FF, Riew KD (1999) Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1701–1711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Longo UG, Loppini M, Romeo G, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2014) Evidence-based surgical management of spondylolisthesis: reduction or arthrodesis in situ. J Bone Joint Surg 96:53–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Labelle H, Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P (2011) Spino-pelvic sagittal balance of spondylolisthesis: a review and classification. Eur Spine J 20:641–646

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Chopin D, Berthonnaud E, Hresko T, O’Brien M (2008) Spino-pelvic alignment after surgical correction for developmental spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 17:1170–1176

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Z, Wang B, Yin B, Liu W, Yang F, Lv G (2014) The relationship between spinopelvic parameters and clinical symptoms of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis: a prospective study of 64 patients. Eur Spine J 23:560–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Prof. Roberta Aronica for English revision of the current manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Di Martino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faldini, C., Di Martino, A., Perna, F. et al. Changes in spino-pelvic alignment after surgical treatment of high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis by a posterior approach: a report of 41 cases. Eur Spine J 23 (Suppl 6), 714–719 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3552-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3552-z

Keywords

Navigation