Abstract
Objective
To explore the best entry point and trajectory of anterior cervical transpedicular screws in the lower cervical spine by radiological studies, and provide reference for clinical application.
Methods
Fifty patients were scanned by computed tomography and confirmed no obvious defect of the cervical spine. On horizontal axis, camber angle (α) and axial length (AL) were measured from C3 to C7. On sagittal view, the cranial or caudal angle (β) and sagittal length (SL) were also measured from C3 to C7. On the sagittal and horizontal planes vertebrae were respectively divided into four areas, ordered 1–4, on the anterior side of the pedicle. The areas and angles of pedicle intersect into the vertebral body were recorded. We inserted six anterior pedicle screws into the lower cervical spine of three patients by this technique.
Results
On transverse plane, camber angle (α) of C3–C5 increased gradually, while it decreased from C5 to C7. On sagittal view, C3 and C4 pedicles showed cranial tilting, while C5 to C7 were caudally tilted. AL and SL values increased gradually from C3 to C7. The number of the intersections of C3–C7 in each area was also different. Six pedicle screws of three cases were inserted into the lower cervical spine with proper placement and no complications.
Conclusion
Anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) is a theoretically feasible option for internal fixation. The technique described in this paper was subsequently used in three patients without complication. Future improvement of ATPS insertion remains necessary for this technically demanding procedure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aramomi M, Masaki Y, Koshizuka S, Kadota R, Okawa A, Koda M, Yamazaki M (2008) Anterior pedicle screw fixation for multi-level cervical corpectomy and spinal fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:575–582
Koller H, Hempfing A, Acosta F, Fox M, Scheiter A, Tauber M, Holz U, Resch H, Hitzl W (2008) Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Part I: Study on morphological feasibility, indications, and technical prerequisites. Eur Spine J 17:523–538
Koller H, Acosta F, Tauber M, Fox M, Martin H, Forstner R, Augat P, Penzkofer R, Pirich C, Kässmann H (2008) Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS)—Part II. Accuracy of manual insertion and pull-out strength of ATPS. Eur Spine J 17:539–555
Koller H, Hitzl W, Acosta F, Tauber M, Zenner J, Resch H, Yukawa Y, Meier O, Schmidt R, Mayer M (2009) In vitro study of accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using an electronic conductivity device (ATPS part III). Eur Spine J 18:1300–1313
Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Nakashima H, Machino M (2009) Anterior cervical pedicle screw and plate fixation using fluoroscope-assisted pedicle axis view imaging: a preliminary report of a new cervical reconstruction technique. Eur Spine J 18:911–916
Marchesi DG (2009) Reviewer’s comment concerning “Anterior cervical pedicle screw and plate fixation using fluoroscope-assisted pedicle axis view imaging: a preliminary report of a new cervical reconstruction technique” by Y. Yukawa et al. Eur Spine J 18:917. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0949-1
Zhao Lj Xu, Rm Jiang Wy, Ma Wh, Xu Nj HuY (2011) A new technique for anterior cervical pedicle screw implantation. Orthop Sur 3:193–198
Ikenaga M, Mukaida M, Nagahara R, Yasunaga T, Ueda Y, Sohma Y (2012) Anterior cervical reconstruction with pedicle screws after a 4-level corpectomy. Spine 37:E927–E930
Fu M, Lin L, Kong X, Zhao W, Tang L, Li J, Ouyang J (2013) Construction and accuracy assessment of patient-specific biocompatible drill template for cervical anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) insertion: an in vitro study. PLoS One 8:e53580
Acosta FL Jr, Aryan HE, Chou D, Ames CP (2008) Long-term biomechanical stability and clinical improvement after extended multi-level corpectomy and circumferential reconstruction of the cervical spine using titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:165–174
Brazenor GA (2007) Comparison of multisegment anterior cervical fixation using bone strut graft versus a titanium rod and buttress prosthesis: analysis of outcome with long-term follow-up and interview by independent physician. Spine 32:63–71
Koller H, Hempfing A, Ferraris L, Maier O, Hitzl W, Metz-Stavenhagen P (2007) 4-and 5-level anterior fusions of the cervical spine: review of literature and clinical results. Eur Spine J 16:2055–2071
Daubs MD (2005) Early failures following cervical corpectomy reconstruction with titanium mesh cages and anterior plating. Spine 30:1402–1406
Koller H, Schnidt R, Mayer M, Hitzl W, Zenner J, Midderhoff S, Graf N, Resch H, Wilke HJ (2010) The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping. Eur Spine J 19:2137–2148
Epstein NE (2000) The value of anterior cervical plating in preventing vertebral fracture and graft extrusion after multi-level anterior cervical corpectomy with posterior wiring and fusion: indications, results, and complications. J Spinal Disord Tech 13:9–15
Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim T-H, An HS (2003) Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multi-level corpectomy of the cervical spine. Spine 28:2352–2358
Conflict of interest
No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, L., Li, G., Liu, J. et al. Radiological studies on the best entry point and trajectory of anterior cervical pedicle screw in the lower cervical spine. Eur Spine J 23, 2175–2181 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3473-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3473-x