Skip to main content
Log in

A novel technique for treatment of progressive scoliosis in young children using a 3-hook and 2-screw construct (H3S2) on a single sub-muscular growing rod: surgical technique

  • Ideas and Technical Innovations
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Several different growing rod techniques have been described in the literature to treat progressive scoliosis in young children. Nevertheless, none of these techniques has shown a real superiority, and the rate of complications remains high. The purpose of this report is to describe an original fusionless method of treatment for this problem.

Materials and methods

The 3 hooks–2 screws (H3S2) construct consists of a single 5.5 mm titanium rod with three hooks proximally and two monoaxial pedicle screws distally, and some extra length of rod located distally and/or proximally that can be used for future lengthenings. To date, a total of 103 H3S2 constructs have been performed in our institution. This paper reports the preliminary results on 38 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Results

This procedure was found to be effective in maintaining scoliosis correction while allowing continued spinal growth and was associated with a low rate of complications.

Conclusions

The H3S2 construct was found to have several advantages over the growing rod techniques as previously described in the literature. These include no need for post-operative bracing, fewer lengthening procedures and a lower rate of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS et al (2008) Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine 33:984–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akbarnia BA, Emans JB (2010) Complications of growth-sparing surgery in early onset scoliosis. Spine 35:2193–2204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bess S, Akbarnia BA et al (2010) Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2533–2543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cahill PJ, Marvil S, Cuddihy L et al (2010) Autofusion in the immature spine treated with growing rods. Spine 35:1199–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell RM Jr, Smith MD, Mayes TC, Mangos JA, Willey-Courand DB, Kose N, Pinero RF, Alder ME, Duong HL, Surber JL (2004) The effect of opening wedge thoracostomy on thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1659–1674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Conner AN (1984) Early onset scoliosis: a call for awareness. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 289:962–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Emans JB, Caubet JF, Ordonez CL et al (2005) The treatment of spine and chest wall deformities with fused ribs by expansion thoracostomy and insertion of vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib: growth of thoracic spine and improvement of lung volumes. Spine 30:S58–S68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Farooq N, Garrido E, Altaf F et al (2010) Minimizing complications with single submuscular growing rods. Spine 35:2252–2258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg CJ, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2002) Long-term results from in situ fusion for congenital vertebral deformity. Spine 27:619–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karol LA, Johnston C, Mladenov K, Schochet P, Walters P, Browne RH (2008) Pulmonary function following early thoracic fusion in non-neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1272–1281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marks DS, Iqbal MJ, Thompson AG et al (1996) Convex spinal epiphysiodesis in the management of progressive infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 21:1884–1888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miladi L, Journe A, Mousny M (2013) H3S2 (3 Hooks-2 Screws) construct. A simple growing rod technique for early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):96–105

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mineiro J, Weinstein SL (2002) Subcutaneous rodding for progressive spinal curvatures: early results. J Pediatr Orthop 22:290–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moe J, Kharrat K, Winter R et al (1984) Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult problems in young children. Clin Orthop 185:35–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patterson J, Webb J, Burwell RG (1990) The operative treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis. Spine 15:809–815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pratt RK, Webb JK, Burwell RG et al (1999) Luque trolley and convex epiphysiodesis in the management of infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:1538–1547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reinker K, Simmons JW, Patil V, Stinson Z (2011) Can VEPTR control progression of early-onset kyphoscoliosis? a cohort study of VEPTR patients with severe kyphoscoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1342–1348

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sankar W, Skaggs DL, Yazici M et al (2009) Lengthening of dual growing rods: is there a law of diminishing return? J Child Orthop 3:503–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schroerlucke SR, Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB (2012) How does thoracic kyphosis affect patient outcomes in growing rod surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(15):1303–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson GH, Akbarnia BA, Campbell RM (2007) Growing rod techniques in early onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 27:354–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiltse LL, Spencer CW (1988) New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 13:696–706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Winter RB, Moe JH (1982) The results of spinal arthrodesis for congenital spinal deformity in patients younger than five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:419–432

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang JS, McElroy MJ, Akbarnia BA et al (2010) Growing rods for spinal deformity: characterizing consensus and variation in current use. J Pediatr Orthop 30:264–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang S, Sponseller D, Thompson H, Akbarnia A, Emans B, Yazici M, Skaggs L, Shah A, Salari P, Poe-Kochert C (2011) Growing rod fractures: risk factors and opportunities for prevention. Spine 20:1639–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lotfi Miladi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miladi, L., Mousny, M. A novel technique for treatment of progressive scoliosis in young children using a 3-hook and 2-screw construct (H3S2) on a single sub-muscular growing rod: surgical technique. Eur Spine J 23 (Suppl 4), 432–437 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3339-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3339-2

Keywords

Navigation