Abstract
Micromachining of microelectromechanical systems which is similar to other fabrication processes has inherent variation that leads to uncertain dimensional and material properties. Methods for optimization under uncertainty analysis can be used to reduce microdevice sensitivity to these uncertainties in order to create a more robust design, thereby increasing reliability and yield. In this paper, approaches for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, and robust optimization of an electro-thermal microactuator are applied to take into account the influence of dimensional and material property uncertainties on microactuator tip deflection. These uncertainties include variation of thickness, length and width of cold and hot arms, gap, Young modulus and thermal expansion coefficient. A simple and efficient uncertainty analysis method is performed by creating second-order metamodel through Box-Behnken design and Monte Carlo simulation. Also, the influence of uncertainties has been examined using direct Monte Carlo Simulation method. The results show that the standard deviations of tip deflection generated by these uncertainty analysis methods are very close to each other. Simulation results of tip deflection have been validated by a comparison with experimental results in literature. The analysis is performed at multiple input voltages to estimate uncertainty bands around the deflection curve. Experimental data fall within 95 % confidence boundary obtained by simulation results. Also, the sensitivity analysis results demonstrate that microactuator performance has been affected more by thermal expansion coefficient and microactuator gap uncertainties. Finally, approaches for robust optimization to achieve the optimal designs for microactuator are used. The proposed robust microactuators are less sensitive to uncertainties. For this goal, two methods including Genetic Algorithm and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm are employed to find the robust designs for microactuator.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atre A (2006) Analysis of out-of-plane thermal microactuators. J Micromech Microeng IOP 16:205–213
Billinton R, Allan RN (1992) Reliability evaluation of engineering systems: concepts and techniques. Springer, NewYork
Chen W, Allen JK, Tsui KL, Mistree F (1996) A procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. J Mechanical design 118(4):478–485. ISSN 1050-0472
Coleman HW, Steele WG (1999) Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: nSGA-II. J Trans Evol Comput IEEE 6(2):182–197
Gary WG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370–380
Giunta AA (1997) Aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization using design of experiments theory and response surface modeling methods. Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg
Gupta RK (2000) Electronically probed measurements of MEMS geometries. J Microelectromech Syst 9(3):380–389
Houck CH, Joines JA and Kay MG (1996) Genetic algorithm for function optimization: a matlab implementation. The GAOT Toolbox for Matlab. http://www.ie.ncsu.edu/mirage/GAToolBox/gaot/./pap
Hu W, Li E, Li GY, Zhong ZH (2008) Development of metamodeling based optimization system for high nonlinear engineering problems. J Adv Eng Softw 39:629–645
Huang QA, Lee NKS (1999a) Analysis and design of polysilicon thermal flexure actuator. J Micromech Microeng 9:64–70
Huang QA, Lee NKS (1999b) Analytical modeling and optimization for a laterally-driven polysilicon thermal actuator. J Microsyst Technol 5:133–137
Jin R, Chen W, Simpson T (2001) Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. J Struct Multidiscip Optim 23:1–13
Jin R, Du X, Chen W (2003) The Use of Metamodeling Techniques for Optimization under Uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 25:99–116
Kang ZH (2005) Robust design optimization of structures under uncertainties. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering and Geodesy, University of Stuttgart
Khayatzadeh SB, Shamshirsaz M, Bahrami M (2010) Effect of Dimensional and Material Property Uncertainties on Thermal Flexure Microactuator Response Using Probabilistic Methods. J Microsystem Technologies, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 16(7):1081–1090
Koester DA, Mahadevan R, Hardyand B, Markus KW (2001) MUMPs® design handbook, revision 7.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Cronos Integrated Microsystems
Ligetti C, Simpson TW (2005) Metamodel-driven design optimization using integrative graphical design interfaces: results from a job shop manufacturing simulation experiment. J Comput Inf Sci Eng ASME 5(1):8–17
Liu H, Chen W, Sudjianto A (2004) Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Design under Uncertainty. 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA 2004-4589
Mawardi A, Pitchumani R (2004) Design of microresonators under uncertainty. J Microelectromech Syst 14(1):63–69
Pan CS, Hsu W (1997) An electro-thermally and laterally driven polysilicon microactuator. J Micromech Microeng 7:7–13
Raghuwanshi MM, Kakde OG (2004) Survey on Multiobjective Evolutionary and Real Coded Genetic Algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 8th Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolu- tionasy Systems, pp 150–161
Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (2000) Sensitivity Analysis. Wiley, New York
Shamshirsaz M, Maroufi M, Asgari MB, Gheisarieha M (2009) Influence of material stiffness and geometrical variations on the electro-thermally driven microactuator performance. J Microsyst Technol 15(1):155–159
Sharpe WN, Brown S, Johnson GC, Knauss W (1998) Round-robin tests of modulus and strength of polysilicon. Mater Res Soc Symp 518:57–65
Sharpe WN, Jackson KM, Hemker KJ, Xie Z (2001) Effect of specimen size on young’s modulus and fracture strength of polysilicon. J Microelectromech Syst 10:317–326
Simpson TW, Booker AJ, Ghosh D, Giunta AA, Koch PN, Yang RJ (2004) Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion. J Struct Multidiscip Optim 27(5):302–313
Srinivas N, Deb K (1994) Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. J Evol Comput 2(3):221–248
Taguchi G, Elsaed E, Hsiang T (1989) Quality engineering in production systems. McGraw-Hill, New York
Tanner DM, Owen AC Jr, Rodriguez F (2003) Resonant Frequency Method for Monitoring MEMS Fabrication. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 4980:220–228
Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mechanical Design 129(4):370–380
Wittwer JW (2001) Predicting the Effects of Dimensional and Material Property Variations in Micro Compliant Mechanisms. M.S. Thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
Wittwer JW (2005) Simulation-Based Design under Uncertainty for Compliant Microelectromechanical Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
Wittwer JW, Baker MS, Howell L (2006) Robust Design and Model Validation of Nonlinear Compliant Micromechanisms. J Microelectromech Syst 15(1):33–41
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Safaie, B.K., Shamshirsaz, M. & Bahrami, M. Robust design optimization of electro-thermal microactuator using probabilistic methods. Microsyst Technol 22, 557–568 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-015-2593-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-015-2593-5