Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Remimazolam is a member of the benzodiazepine family with a chemical structure and pharmacological action similar to that of midazolam and, like remifentanil, is rapidly metabolized [1]. Induction with propofol produces the potential for “Can’t Intubate, Can’t Ventilate (CICV)” scenarios as there is no effective antagonist. In contrast, remimazolam action can be antagonized by flumazenil producing additional safety. Remimazolam has the potential broaden/adds new options to TIVA. In this Editorial, I outline the advantages and problems of remimazolam.
Pharmacological characteristics
Remimazolam exerts its sedative effects by facilitating the binding of GABA to GABAA receptors at the benzodiazepine binding site. Indeed, remimazolam binds with high affinity to the benzodiazepine binding site of the rat brain GABAA receptor, while the main metabolite, CNS7054, bound with 300–400-fold lower affinity [1]. Remimazolam has threefold higher systemic clearance than midazolam, and a steady state distribution volume of 37.3 L, terminal half-life of 0.92 h, and mean residence time of 0.57 h [2]. U.S. phase I pharmacokinetic trials demonstrated that the simulated context-sensitive half-time of remimazolam is 7–8 min after 2-h infusion; this is much shorter than midazolam [2].
Beneficial actions
Antinociception
Although midazolam exerts analgesic effects via the κ-opioid receptor [3], there is no data showing remimazolam interaction with opioid receptors. Structural similarity is suggestive of similar κ-opioid receptor profiles. Benzodiazepines in general are known to enhance opioid analgesia [4], so it is not unreasonable. Bevans and colleagues [5] reported that inhaled remimazolam potentiated inhaled remifentanil-induced analgesia in mice using a tail flick test. Moreover, Kops et al. [6] reported that both remimazolam and midazolam showed a higher synergy for remifentanil (94% and 98%, respectively) compared to propofol (61%) in monkeys. An enhancing effect of remimazolam on opioid analgesia has been shown in the clinical setting by Dao and colleagues [7] who reported that patients with remimazolam sedation required significantly less fentanyl for analgesia than those with midazolam sedation.
Anti-inflammatory effects
Liu and colleagues [8] determined whether remimazolam diminished lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation both in vitro and in vivo. They found that survival was significantly longer in mice with remimazolam and that remimazolam significantly reduced LPS-increased inflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. From their data, they speculated that the anti-inflammatory effects of remimazolam may be due to inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal pathway and Ras-related protein Rab-5A (Rab5a)-related Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression at cell surface in response to LPS. Fang and colleagues [9] used a sepsis-associated acute liver injury (SALI) rat model which involved treatment with LPS and galactosamine (aggravation of LPS-induced liver injury) to determine anti-inflammatory effects of remimazolam. They found that remimazolam mitigated SALI and alleviated inflammation and elevation of p38 MAPK phosphorylation. These effects were reversed by a peripheral benzodiazepine antagonist, PK11195. There are no current reports on the anti-inflammatory effects of remimazolam in the clinical setting.
Neuroprotective effects
Shi and colleagues [10] used a rat model of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) with focal transient cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury to determine neuroprotective effects of remimazolam. They found that remimazolam could alleviate MACO-induced neurological dysfunction, infarct volume, and cortical neuronal damages. Neuroprotection with remimazolam may be due to inhibition of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome pathway followed by suppression of pyroptosis and further inflammatory cascades.
Anti-tumor effects
Although there are no reports clearly indicating anti-tumor effects of remimazolam, several articles are suggestive. Midazolam has been reported to pose anti-tumor activity against various tumors [11,12,13,14]. In addition, the anti-tumor actions were antagonized by flumazenil in neuroglioma, lung carcinoma, and melanoma [11, 12] or by PK11195 in lung cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [13, 14]. As anti-tumor actions of midazolam were antagonized by benzodiazepine antagonists, remimazolam is likely to exert similar anti-tumor actions.
Prevention of “Can’t Intubate, Can’t Ventilate (CICV)”
A situation that anesthesiologists most wish to avoid is “Can’t Intubate, Can’t Ventilate (CICV)” during induction of anesthesia. Could CICV be avoided with the advent of sugammadex? To address CICV, rapid recovery of spontaneous respiration is essential. In CICV situation, sugammadex should be promptly administrated to antagonize rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. However, as not only neuromuscular blockade but also sedatives and opioids also produce a prolonged respiratory depression, reversal of sedatives and opioids is required to fully restore respiratory activity [15]. Although opioid actions can be reversed by naloxone, no antagonist was available for short-acting anesthetic agents for the induction of anesthesia before advent of remimazolam. With flumazenil reversible remimazolam actions a family of reversal agents are available to mitigate CICV scenarios.
Hemodynamics
A Japanese phase IIb/III trial for remimazolam demonstrated that hypotensive adverse drug reaction was significantly lower in patients with remimazolam (20.0–24.0%) compared with patients with propofol (49.3%) [16]. In ASA III patients hypotensive adverse reactions were 41.9% and 67.7% at induction doses of remimazolam of 6 and 12 mg/kg/h, respectively, while propofol causes hypotension in up to 75% of patients [17]. Remimazolam anesthesia is noninferior to inhalation anesthesia in terms of hemodynamics. Song et al. [18] reported that the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension was comparable to both remimazolam TIVA (n = 84) and desflurane anesthesia (n = 84) in patients aged 19–65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or robotic gynecologic surgery. When compared with sevoflurane, Lee and colleagues [19] found that remimazolam anesthesia was associated with significantly less frequent use of vasopressors.
Adverse reactions
Anaphylaxis
There have been several case reports of anaphylactic shock associated with remimazolam [20, 21]. Some cases have resulted in cardiac arrest [20, 21]. The frequency of anaphylactic shock with remimazolam is not yet known.
Postoperative cognition
Although the context-sensitive half-time of remimazolam is similar to that of propofol at the 2-h infusion and lower with longer infusions [22], recovery of BIS, and cognitive function after termination of anesthetic infusion is faster with propofol than remimazolam [16]. Song and colleagues [18] compared quality of recovery between remimazolam and desflurane anesthesia and found that a time to extubation, cognitive recovery, and to discharge from postoperative care unit (PACU) are significantly longer in the remimazolam group than in the desflurane group. However, when flumazenil is used, times to emergence from anesthesia and the length of PACU stay have also been reported to be faster than with propofol anesthesia even in cirrhotic patients [23]. Why does slow cognitive recovery occur with remimazolam anesthesia? In general, it is known that benzodiazepines increase the risk of postoperative delirium [24]. Zhou et al. [25] studied the effects of remimazolam on various cognitive tests in mice. They found that remimazolam declined cognitive function in a dose-dependent manner. The results suggest that the mechanism of remimazolam-induced cognitive dysfunction may be due to activation of glutamate receptors and Ca–calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CAMK) II. The increases in intracellular Ca2+ induce neuronal apoptosis. Another contributing factor is the accumulation of amyloid-β plaques in the brain due to abnormal phosphorylation of tau protein. Although volatile inhaled anesthetics also induced amyloid-β accumulation [26], cognitive recovery is rapid after desflurane anesthesia [18]. Thus, it is doubtful whether amyloid-β accumulation alone may contribute to the mechanism. In a prospective cohort study of cardiovascular surgical patients. Aoki et al. [27] showed no difference in the incidence of POD between anesthesia with and without remimazolam. It is difficult to conclude using only this report that the incidence of POD with remimazolam is comparable to other anesthetic agents; future studies are required.
Tolerance to remimazolam in patients with existing benzodiazepine medication
Tolerance to benzodiazepines occurs for many of their effects, especially for sleep with regular use [28]. Indeed, there are several reports showing difficulty in maintaining anesthesia with remimazolam [29, 30]. Remimazolam should be avoided in chronic benzodiazepine users (See Fig. 1).
Remimazolam re-sedation after flumazenil administration
Using pharmacokinetic simulations, Masui [31] explains that the risk of re-sedation after remimazolam is antagonized by flumazenil. If a larger bolus of flumazenil is administered, there is a risk of reappearance of remimazolam sedation due to competitive mechanism of action. A larger bolus of flumazenil strongly antagonizes the action of remimazolam immediately after the bolus. However, if the residual remimazolam concentration is high, the reversal effect may disappear 10 min after the bolus dose of flumazenil. In addition, a decrease in total clearance of remimazolam is another risk for reappearance. Patients with lower clearance have a slower decline in remimazolam concentration after the end of remimazolam infusion, resulting in higher residual concentrations thereafter. Reduction in hepatic blood flow may also be a risk as remimazolam is primarily metabolized by carboxylesterase 1 in the liver. Indeed, there are a few reports [32] regarding re-sedation after remimazolam anesthesia followed by reversal of flumazenil. Therefore, pharmacokinetic simulation with monitoring clinical symptoms after the termination of remimazolam infusion may be useful to predict the time course of residual effects and the possibility of re-sedation.
In this editorial, I have introduced the beneficial–adverse actions balance for remimazolam. Further studies are required, and these will be facilitated by wider availability and use.
Data Availability
There are no data obtained for this report.
References
Wang M, Zhao X, Yin P, Bao X, Tang H, Kang X. Profile of remimazolam in anesthesiology: a narrative review of clinical research progress. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022;16:3431–44.
Wiltshire HR, Kilpatrick GJ, Tilbrook GS, Borkett KM. A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): part II. population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:284–96.
Cox RF, Collins MA. The effects of benzodiazepines on human opioid receptor binding and function. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:354–8.
O’Neill MF, Dourish CT, Iversen SD. Morphine-induced analgesia in the rat paw pressure test is blocked by CCK and enhanced by the CCK antagonist MK-329. Neuropharmacology. 1989;28:243–7.
Bevans T, Deering-Rice C, Stockmann C, Rower J, Sakata D, Reilly C. Inhaled remimazolam potentiates inhaled remifentanil in rodents. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1484–90.
Kops MS, Pesic M, Petersen KU, Schmalix WA, Stöhr T. Impact of concurrent remifentanil on the sedative effects of remimazolam, midazolam and propofol in cynomolgus monkeys. Eur J Pharmacol. 2021;890: 173639.
Dao VA, Schippers F, Stöhr T. Efficacy of remimazolam versus midazolam for procedural sedation: post hoc integrated analyses of three phase 3 clinical trials. Endosc Int Open. 2022;10:E378–85.
Liu X, Lin S, Zhong Y, Shen J, Zhang X, Luo S, Huang L, Zhang L, Zhou S, Tang J. Remimazolam protects against LPS-induced endotoxicity improving survival of endotoxemia mice. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 739603.
Fang H, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li L, An S, Huang Q, Chen Z, Yang H, Wu J, Zeng Z. Remimazolam reduces sepsis-associated acute liver injury by activation of peripheral benzodiazepine receptors and p38 inhibition of macrophages. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;101: 108331.
Shi M, Chen J, Liu T, Dai W, Zhou Z, Chen L, Xie Y. Protective effects of remimazolam on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats by inhibiting of NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent pyroptosis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022;16:413–23.
Wang C, Datoo T, Zhao H, Wu L, Date A, Jiang C, Sanders RD, Wang G, Bevan C, Ma D. Midazolam and dexmedetomidine affect neuroglioma and lung carcinoma cell biology in vitro and in vivo. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:1000–14.
Seo JA, Jeon HY, Kim M, Lee YJ, Han ET, Park WS, Hong SH, Kim YM, Ha KS. Anti-metastatic effect of midazolam on melanoma B16F10 cells in the lungs of diabetic mice. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;178: 114052.
Lu HL, Wu KC, Chen CW, Weng HK, Huang BM, Lin TY, Liu MH, So EC, Lin RM, Wang YK. Anticancer effects of midazolam on lung and breast cancers by inhibiting cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Life. 2021;11:1396.
Oshima Y, Sano M, Kajiwara I, Ichimaru Y, Itaya T, Kuramochi T, Hayashi E, Kim J, Kitajima O, Masugi Y, Masamune A, Ijichi H, Ishii Y, Suzuki T. Midazolam exhibits antitumour and anti-inflammatory effects in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128:679–90.
Naguib M, Brewer L, LaPierre C, Kopman AF, Johnson KB. The myth of rescue reversal in “can’t intubate, can’t ventilate (CICV)” scenarios. Anesth Analg. 2016;123:82–92.
Doi M, Morita K, Takeda J, Sakamoto A, Yamakage M, Suzuki T. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicentre, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial. J Anesth. 2020;34:543–53.
Doi M, Hirata N, Suzuki T, Morisaki H, Morimatsu H, Sakamoto A. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in high-risk surgical patients (ASA Class III): results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparative trial. J Anesth. 2020;34:491–501.
Song SW, Jang YN, Yoon MW, Jeon YG. Quality of recovery in patients administered remimazolam versus those administered an inhalant agent for the maintenance of general anesthesia: a randomized control trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22:226.
Lee B, Kim MH, Kong HJ, Shin HJ, Yang S, Kim NY, Chae D. Effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with gastric cancer undergoing robotic gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2643.
Hasushita Y, Nagao M, Miyazawa Y, Yunoki K, Mima H. Cardiac arrest following remimazolam-induced anaphylaxis: a case report. AA Pract. 2022;16: e01616.
Kim KM, Lee H, Bang JY, Choi BM, Noh GJ. Anaphylaxis following remimazolam administration during induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129:e122–4.
Wesolowski AM, Zaccagnino MP, Malapero RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Remimazolam: pharmacologic considerations and clinical role in anesthesiology. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36:1021–7.
Shi F, Chen Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Zhao T. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol for general anesthesia in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:583–91.
Tomimaru Y, Park SA, Shibata A, Miyagawa S, Noguchi K, Noura S, Imamura H, Shirakawa T, Dono K. Predictive factors of postoperative delirium in patients after panncreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:849–54.
Zhou XH, Zhang CC, Wang L, Jin SL. Remimazolam induced cognitive dysfunction in mice via glutamate excitotoxicity. Transl Neurosci. 2022;13:104–15.
Jiang J, Jiang H. Effect of the inhaled anesthetics isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane on the neuropathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (review). Mol Med Rep. 2015;12:3–12.
Aoki Y, Kurita T, Nakajima M, Imai R, Suzuki Y, Makino H, Kinoshita H, Doi M, Nakajima Y. Association between remimazolam and postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective cardiovascular surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Anesth. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-022-03119-7.
Bateson AN. The benzodiazepine site of the GABAA receptor: an old target with new potential? Sleep Med. 2004;5(Suppl 1):S9-15.
Yoshikawa H, Hosokawa M, Kashima Y, Oki S, Masui K. Remimazolam tolerance in long-term benzodiazepine users: a case report of 2 cases. A A Pract. 2021;15: e01460.
Miyanishi M, Yaguramaki T, Maehara Y, Nagata O. Three cases of difficulty in achieving definitive loss of consciousness with remimazolam. JA Clin Rep. 2022;8:4.
Masui K. Caution!! Reappearance of remimazolam effect after a flumazenil bolus: a larger bolus of flumazenil and a lower total remimazolam clearance are higher risks. J Anesth. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-022-03107-x.
Takemori T, Oyama Y, Makino T, Hidaka S, Kitano T. Long-term delayed emergence after remimazolam-based general anesthesia: a case report. JA Clin Rep. 2022;8:86.
Acknowledgements
The main content of this article was presented at a sponsored seminar provided by Mundipharma K.K in the 42nd Annual Meeting of Japan Society for Clinical Anesthesia. The author thank Professor David G Lambert (University Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK) for his valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Professor Hirota has received a lecture fee three times from Mundipharma K.K, remimazolam distributor in Japan.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Hirota, K. Remimazolam: a new string to the TIVA bow. J Anesth 37, 335–339 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03186-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03186-4