Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness and accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device for epidurssal landmark and depth assessment by anesthesiology residents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness and accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device (Accuro, Rivanna Medical, Charlottesville, VA, USA) for epidural landmark and depth assessment when epidural anesthesia is performed by residents.

Methods

Patients scheduled to receive epidural anesthesia were randomly assigned to the Accuro group (group A) or control group (group C). In group A, the depth to the epidural space and the appropriate place for epidural insertion according to Accuro was recorded. In group C, epidural anesthesia was performed using a conventional method. The following were recorded and compared between the groups: time from puncture of the Tuohy needle to loss of resistance, number of Tuohy needle redirects, and epidural-related complications. In group A, depth to the epidural space estimated by Accuro (Accuro Depth) and the actual depth measured with a marker on the needle (Needle Depth) were recorded and compared.

Results

Sixty patients were enrolled during the study period. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the median or range of time required to locate the epidural space.

The number of Tuohy needle redirects was 0 (0–3) in group A and 1.5 (0–7) in group C (P = 0.012). Accuro Depth was less than Needle Depth [mean difference, 0.85 cm (95% CI−1.10 to − 0.62), SD = 0.62].

Conclusions

Although there was no significant difference in time from Tuohy needle puncture to loss of resistance, Accuro reduced the number of Tuohy needle redirects and accurately indicated the depth to the epidural space. Accuro may be useful for identifying the needle insertion point and estimating depth to the epidural space when residents perform epidural anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:408–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrington MJ, Kluger R. Ultrasound guidance reduces the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:289–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:277–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthesia to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:1122–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim SW, Kim YM, Kim SH, Chung MH, Choi YR, Choi EM. Comparison of loss of resistance technique between Epidrum® and conventional method for identifying the epidural space. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;62:322–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gülen G, Akkaya T, Ozkan D, Kaydul M, Gözaydin O, Gümüş H. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks. Agri. 2012;24:37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tawfik MM, Atallah MM, Elkharboutly WS, Allakkany NS, Abdelkhalek M. Does preprocedural ultrasound increase the first-pass success rate of epidural catheterization before cesarean delivery? A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:851–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seligman KM, Weiniger CF, Carvalho B. The accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device for neuraxial depth and landmark assessment: a prospective cohort trial. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1995–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motonobu Kimizuka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Motonobu Kimizuka has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kimizuka, M., Tokinaga, Y., Taguchi, M. et al. Usefulness and accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device for epidurssal landmark and depth assessment by anesthesiology residents. J Anesth 36, 693–697 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-022-03096-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-022-03096-x

Keywords

Navigation