Skip to main content
Log in

The effectiveness of the intramuscular quadratus lumborum block in postoperative analgesia after cesarean section with vertical incision: a randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has recently been used for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery. Although there are several approaches to QLB, the effectiveness of intramuscular QLB (QLBi) remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to examine the effectiveness of QLBi for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section with a vertical midline incision.

Methods

In this single-center, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study, 36 women who were scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly divided into a QLBi group (n = 18) and a placebo group (n = 18). In both groups, spinal anesthesia was performed with 10–11 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 15 µg fentanyl. After the surgery, in the QLBi group, 0.4 mL/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine was injected into the bilateral quadratus lumborum muscle under ultrasound guidance (the total volume was 0.8 mL/kg). In the placebo group, instead of ropivacaine, the subjects were injected with the same amount of normal saline. The primary outcome measure was elapsed time to first analgesic use from the QLBi block after cesarean section.

Results

The data from all 36 patients were analyzed. There were no significant differences between the QLBi and placebo groups regarding elapsed time to first postoperative analgesic use [mean 230 (standard deviation 103) vs 194 (89) min; 95% confidence interval − 101 to 30; p = 0.27].

Conclusions

QLBi with the concentration and amount of local anesthetic used in the present study was clinically slightly effective, and the effect was limited for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barrington M. Quadratus lumborum block: anatomical concepts, mechanisms, and techniques. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:322–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kadam VR. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block as a postoperative analgesic technique for laparotomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29:550–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, Shetty N. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(6):757–62 (Correction: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:111).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krohg A, Ullensvang K, Rosseland LA, Langesæter E, Sauter AR. The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(2):559–65 (Correction: Anesth Analg. 2019;128(1):e18).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:812–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mieszkowski MM, Mayzner-Zawadzka E, Tuyakov B, Mieszkowska M, Żukowski M, Waśniewski T, Onichimowski D. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Quadratus Lumborum Block type I using ropivacaine in postoperative analgesia after a cesarean section — a controlled clinical study. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(2):89–96. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2018.0015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishio J, Komasawa N, Kido H, Minami T. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2017;41:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parras T, Blanco R. Randomised trial comparing the transversus abdominis plane block posterior approach or quadratus lumborum block type I with femoral block for postoperative analgesia in femoral neck fracture, both ultrasound-guided. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2016;63:141–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Børglum J, Moriggl B, Jensen K, Lønnqvist P-A, Christensen AF, Sauter A, Bendtsen TF. Ultrasound-guided transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Blockade. Br J Anaesth. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/el_9919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elsharkawy H. Quadratus lumborum block with paramedian sagittal oblique (subcostal) approach. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:241–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barnes TJ, Drake R, Maheshwari K, Soliman LM, Horn J-L, Chin KJ. The supra-iliac anterior quadratus lumborum block: a cadaveric study and case series [Le bloc du muscle carré des lombes antérieur par approche supra-iliaque : une étude cadavérique et une série de cas]. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(8):894–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01312-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murouchi T, Iwasaki S, Yamakage M. Quadratus Lumborum block: analgesic effects and chronological ropivacaine concentrations after laparoscopic surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:146–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murouchi T. Quadratus lumborum block intramuscular approach for pediatric surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2016;54:135–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu M, Tang Y, Wang J, Yang J. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020;42:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.02.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:726–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kato R, Shimamoto H, Terui K, Yokota K, Miyao H. Delayed respiratory depression associated with 0.15 mg intrathecal morphine for cesarean section: a review of 1915 cases. J Anesth. 2008;22(2):112–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-007-0593-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogawa R, Akaishi S, Huang C, Dohi T, Aoki M, Omori Y, Koike S, Kobe K, Akimoto M, Hyakusoku H. Clinical applications of basic research that shows reducing skin tension could prevent and treat abnormal scarring: the importance of fascial/subcutaneous tensile reduction sutures and flap surgery for keloid and hypertrophic scar reconstruction. J Nippon Med Sch. 2011;78(2):68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–60. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Habib AS, Wahl K, Gu J, Gan TJ, Adenosine Study Group. Comparison of postoperative pain outcomes after vertical or Pfannenstiel incision for major gynecologic surgery. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(6):1529–34. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007990902959168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen CK, Dam M, Steingrimsdottir GE, Laier GH, Lebech M, Poulsen TD, Chan VWS, Wolmarans M, Bendtsen TF, Børglum J. Ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for elective cesarean section significantly reduces postoperative opioid consumption and prolongs time to first opioid request: a double-blind randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;40(2):107–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2019-100540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tamura T, Kitamura K, Yokota S, Ito S, Shibata Y, Nishiwaki K. Spread of Quadratus Lumborum Block to the paravertebral space via intramuscular injection: a volunteer study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(4):372–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012;221(6):507–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tamura T, Yokota S, Ito S, Shibata Y, Nishiwaki K. Local anesthetic spread into the paravertebral space with two types of quadratus lumborum blocks: a crossover volunteer study. J Anesth. 2019;33(1):26–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2578-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sondekoppam RV, Ip V, Johnston DF, Uppal V, Johnson M, Ganapathy S, Tsui BCH. Ultrasound-guided lateral-medial transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for analgesia following anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a clinical and anatomical study [Analgésie réalisée grâce à un bloc transmusculaire latéro-médial échoguidé du carré des lombes suite à un prélèvement de l’os de la crête iliaque antérieure pour greffe osseuse : une étude clinique et anatomique]. Can J Anaesth. 2018;65(2):178–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-017-1021-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dam M, Moriggl B, Hansen CK, Hoermann R, Bendtsen TF, Børglum J. The pathway of injectate spread with the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block: a cadaver study. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:303–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ivanusic J, Konishi Y, Barrington MJ. A cadaveric study investigating the mechanism of action of erector spinae blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:567–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hussein MM. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in pediatrics: trans-muscular versus intra-muscular approach. J Anesth. 2018;32:850–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Griffiths JD, Le NV, Grant S, Bjorksten A, Hebbard P, Royse C. Symptomatic local anaesthetic toxicity and plasma ropivacaine concentrations after transversus abdominis plane block for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(6):996–1000. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the gynecology ward staff and operating room staff of Aidu Chuo Hospital, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan, who followed the patients intra-/post-operatively, and cooperated with the present study.

Funding

The authors have no sources of funding to declare for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KY designed the study, obtained written consent from the patients, conducted intraoperative management, and prepared the manuscript. ST and KW contributed to the coordination of the study, analysis of data, and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. SO helped to design the study and analysis of data. MM helped to draft the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keisuke Yoshida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aidu Chuo Hospital (approval number: 1901, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, K., Tanaka, S., Watanabe, K. et al. The effectiveness of the intramuscular quadratus lumborum block in postoperative analgesia after cesarean section with vertical incision: a randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study. J Anesth 34, 849–856 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02829-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02829-0

Keywords

Navigation