Skip to main content
Log in

Potency estimation of sugammadex for the reversal of moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a non-randomized dose–response study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is no report investigating the precise potency of sugammadex for antagonizing various intensities of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ED95 of reversibility of sugammadex and reveal the safety factor of 2 mg/kg of sugammadex for moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block.

Methods

Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. After induction of anesthesia, we recorded the adductor pollicis muscle response to ulnar nerve stimulation using acceleromyography. All patients received 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. When the first twitch (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) response reappeared, rocuronium infusion was commenced to maintain T1 at 10% of the control. After the surgery was completed and infusion of rocuronium was stopped, patients were given sugammadex by a cumulative dose technique. The effective doses of sugammadex that led to recovery of the amplitude of T1 and the TOF ratio by 95% (ED95) were calculated from the regression lines of least-squares regression analysis.

Results

The mean ED95 of sugammadex for recovery of T1 and the TOF ratio from rocuronium-induced moderate neuromuscular block was 1.34 (0.24) and 1.14 (0.24) mg/kg, respectively.

Conclusions

The ED95 of sugammadex for the recovery of T1 was significantly greater than that for the TOF ratio. However, a sugammadex dose of 2 mg/kg is equivalent to about 1.5 times the ED95 of sugammadex for reversal of moderate rocuronium-induced block, indicating its safety margin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puhringer FK, Gordon M, Demeyer I, Sparr HJ, Ingimarsson J, Klarin B, van Duijnhoven W, Heeringa M. Sugammadex rapidly reverses moderate rocuronium- or vecuronium- induced neuromuscular block during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a dose-response relationship. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:610–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Duvaldestin P, Kuizenga K, Saldien V, Claudius C, Servin F, Klein J, Debaene B, Heeringa M. A randomized, dose-response study of sugammadex given for the reversal of deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade under sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:74–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamics studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:789–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suzuki T, Fukano N, Kitajima O, Saeki S, Ogawa S. Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:44–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kopman AF, Lien CA, Naguib M. Neuromuscular dose-response studies: determining sample size. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:194–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nemes R, Fülesdi B, Pongrácz A, Asztalos L, Szabó-Maák Z, Lengyel S, Tassonyi E. Impact of reversal strategies on the incidence of postoperative residual paralysis after rocuronium relaxation without neuromuscular monitoring. A partially randomized placebo controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:609–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kotake Y, Ochiai R, Suzuki T, Ogawa S, Takagi S, Ozaki M, Nakatsuka I, Takeda J. Reversal with sugammadex in the absence of monitoring did not preclude residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:545–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muramatsu T, Isono S, Ishikawa T, Nozaki-Taguchi N, Okazaki J, Kitamura Y, Murakami N, Sato Y. Differences of recovery from rocuronium-induced deep paralysis in response to small doses of sugammadex between elderly and nonelderly patients. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:901–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsui M, Konishi J, Suzuki T, Sekijima C, Miyazawa N, Yamamoto S. Reversibility of rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular block with sugammadex in infants and children—a randomized study. Biol Pharm Bull. 2019;42:1637–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito S, Seki H, Sannohe J, Ouchi T. A case of deep residual neuromuscular blockade after sugammadex administration. J Clin Anesth. 2019;58:33–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki T. A train-of-four ratio of 0.9 may not certify adequate recovery after sugammadex. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:368–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonsson M, Gurley D, Dabrowski M, Larsson O, Johnson EC, Eriksson LI. Distinct pharmacologic properties of neuromuscular blocking agents on human neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. A possible explanation for the train-of-four fade. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:521–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith CE, Donati F, Bevan DR. Dose-response curves for succinylcholine: single versus cumulative techniques. Anesthesiology. 1988;69:338–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson FM, Mirakhur RK, Clarke RSJ, Lavery GG. Comparison of cumulative and single bolus dose techniques for determining the potency of vecuronium. Br J Anaesth. 1985;57:1060–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Is the performance of acceleromyography improved with preload and normalization? A comparison with mechanomyography. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1261–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kopman AF, Chin W, Cyriac J. Acceleromyography vs. electromyography: an ipsilateral comparison of the indirectly evoked neuromuscular response to train-of-four stimulation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:316–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Osamu Kitajima and Mai Yamamoto are equally contributing first authors of this article.

Funding

Departmental funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Suzuki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

Suzuki T and Takagi S have received speaker’s fee from MSD. Inc, Japan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitajima, O., Yamamoto, M., Takagi, S. et al. Potency estimation of sugammadex for the reversal of moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a non-randomized dose–response study. J Anesth 34, 348–351 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02751-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02751-5

Keywords

Navigation