Skip to main content
Log in

Epidural pressure changes following caudal blockade: a prospective, observational study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Recent case reports raise the question as to whether anesthetic agents injected into the epidural space could lead to a ‘compartment syndrome’ and neurovascular sequelae. Single-shot caudal epidural anesthesia has been established as a safe technique, but changes in pressure in the caudal epidural space have not been described. Our aim was to study pressure changes to provide preliminary information for future studies design.

Methods

We prospectively measured the pressure changes in the caudal epidural space in 31 pediatric patients. The pressures were measured at loss of resistance, immediately after the bolus dose of local anesthetic (1 ml/kg), and at 15-s intervals up to 3 min.

Results

The pressure at loss of resistance was 35.6 ± 27.8 mmHg. A pulsatile waveform was observed once the epidural space was accessed. The pressure after administration of the local anesthetic bolus (1 ml/kg 0.2 % ropivacaine/bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was 192.5 ± 93.3 mmHg. The pressure decreased to 51.5 ± 39.0 mmHg at 15 s, 26.9 ± 9.9 mmHg after 2 min, and 24.7 ± 11.7 after 3 min. The return to baseline occurred at approximately 45–60 s.

Conclusions

Following the administration of the local anesthetic into the caudal epidural space, there was a marked, but transient, increase in the pressure within the epidural space. It appears unlikely that a slow epidural catheter infusion could lead to a sustained increase in epidural pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meyer MJ, Krane EJ, Goldschneider KR, Klein NJ. Neurological complications associated with epidural analgesia in children: a report of 4 cases of ambiguous etiologies. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1365–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berde C, Greco C. Pediatric regional anesthesia: drawing inferences on safety from prospective registries and case reports. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1259–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vas L, Raghavendran S, Hosalkar H, Patil B. A study of epidural pressures in infants. Paediatr Anesth. 2001;11:575–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Avery RA, Shah SS, Licht DJ, Seiden JA, Huh JW, Boswinkel J, Ruppe MD, Chew A, Mistry RD, Liu GT. Reference range for cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure in children. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:891–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dalens B, Hasnaoui A. Caudal anesthesia in pediatric surgery: success rate and adverse effects in 750 consecutive patients. Anesth Analg. 1989;68:83–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosenberg AT. Regional anaesthesia—children are different. Paediatr Anaesth. 1993;8:447–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bromage PR (1978) Epidural compliance. In: Bromage PR (ed) Epidural analgesia. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp 171–175

  8. Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R, Matsuda I, Inoue S. Effect of extradural compliance and resistance on spread of extradural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 1990;65:508–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Usubiaga JE, Wikinski JA, Usubiaga LE. Epidural pressure and its relation to spread of anesthetic solutions in epidural space. Anesth Analg. 1967;46:440–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Husemeyer RP, White DC. Lumbar extradural injection pressures in pregnant women, an investigation of relationships between rate of injection, injection pressures and extent of analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 1980;52:55–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirabayashi Y, Matsuda I, Inoue S, Shimizu R. Spread of epidural analgesia following a constant pressure injection, an investigation of relationships between locus of injection, epidural pressure, and spread of analgesia. J Anesth. 1987;1:44–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirabayashi Y, Matsuda I, Inoue S, Shimizu R. Epidural pressure and its relation to spread of epidural analgesia. J Anesth. 1987;1:168–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cardoso MMSC, Carvalho JCA. Epidural pressures and spread of 2 % lidocaine in the epidural space: influence of volume and speed of injection of the local anesthetic solution. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:14–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Julie Rice, RN, for her invaluable assistance in data gathering and analysis throughout the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica K. Goeller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no financial interests or conflicts thereof to disclose. This study was fully funded by the Nationwide Children’s Hospital Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Department.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goeller, J.K., Joselyn, A., Martin, D.P. et al. Epidural pressure changes following caudal blockade: a prospective, observational study. J Anesth 30, 578–582 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2166-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2166-5

Keywords

Navigation