Skip to main content
Log in

A maximal-clique-based clustering approach for multi-observer multi-view data by using k-nearest neighbor with S-pseudo-ultrametric induced by a fuzzy similarity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Partitioning multi-view data is a recent challenge in clustering methods, which traditionally consider single-view data. In clustering techniques, finding the similarity or distance between objects, handled by metrics in \(\mathbb {R}^{n}\), plays a central role in community detection. Under this framework, different algorithms have been developed where the output relies on an exact distance calculated based on the objects’ features. As feature information might be qualitative data defined in an ambiguous environment, this study offers a new class of metrics, so-called S-distance, as a dual of a fuzzy T-similarity, which successfully produces a collective distance based on all views/observers and provides a more flexible framework to define distance under uncertainty. Besides, most existing approaches handle multi-view clustering by aggregating each view’s clusters or using an iterative optimization method; both are time-consuming. Here, by transforming the multi-view clustering problem into node clustering, we suggest a new approach without iteration for multi-view and multi-observer data. Our proposed method, GMSkNN, uses an attribute-structural similarity relation between nodes to get more coherent clusters. To this end, we first build a k-nearest neighbor (kNN) directed graph using the proposed S-distance, then transform it into an undirected graph based on the neighborhood information of the nodes so that the resultant graph is characterized based on nodes interactions and initial features information of the nodes. Next, a new maximal-clique-based clustering is designed to complete the node partitioning. The proposed clustering algorithm is programmed and tested on synthetic and four real-world datasets using the R software. The clustering results are analyzed based on several indexes. This analysis shows the efficiency of the proposed algorithm compared to the traditional clustering methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Algorithm 3
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The synthetic dataset generated and analyzed during the current study is available online via the following link https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1kHy7QJxe7rGjkYs5P1iqzh1AtiEAvZJc. Other datasets analyzed during the current study are available on “igraphdata” of R-packages and Kaggle repository via the following link https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/azadehzahedikhameneh/world-happiness-report-pre-covid-vs-covid. The used data are also available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1kHy7QJxe7rGjkYs5P1iqzh1AtiEAvZJc.

  2. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1kHy7QJxe7rGjkYs5P1iqzh1AtiEAvZJc

  3. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/azadehzahedikhameneh/world-happiness-report-pre-covid-vs-covid.

References

  1. Mota VC, Damasceno FA, Leite DF (2018) Fuzzy clustering and fuzzy validity measures for knowledge discovery and decision making in agricultural engineering. Comput Electron Agric 150:118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xue Y, Deng Y (2021) Decision making under measure-based granular uncertainty with intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Appl Intell 51(8):6224–6233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheung G, Magli E, Tanaka Y, Ng MK (2018) Graph spectral image processing. Proc IEEE 106(5):907–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiao L, Zhao J (2019) A survey on the new generation of deep learning in image processing. IEEE Access 7:172231–172263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Qi C, Zhang J, Jia H, Mao Q, Wang L, Song H (2021) Deep face clustering using residual graph convolutional network. Knowl-Based Syst 211:106561–106568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu Y, Duan H, Du S (2015) Multiple fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm in medical diagnosis. Technol Health Care 23(s2):519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maier A, Syben C, Lasser T, Riess C (2019) A gentle introduction to deep learning in medical image processing. Z Med Phys 29(2):86–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nie F, Li J, Li X, et al (2017) Self-weighted multiview clustering with multiple graphs. In: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-17) self-weighted, pp. 2564–2570

  9. Lin Z, Kang Z, Zhang L, Tian L (2021) Multi-view attributed graph clustering. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3101227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang H, Yang Y, Liu B, Fujita H (2019) A study of graph-based system for multi-view clustering. Knowl-Based Syst 163:1009–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang H, Yang Y, Liu B (2019) GMC: graph-based multi-view clustering. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 32(6):1116–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang Z, Shi G, Huang S, Chen W, Pu X, Zhou JT, Xu Z (2020) Multi-graph fusion for multi-view spectral clustering. Knowl-Based Syst 189:105102–105111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang X, Liu X (2022) Multiview clustering of adaptive sparse representation based on coupled p systems. Entropy 24(4):568–591

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhong X, Xu X, Chen X (2022) A clustering and fusion method for large group decision making with double information and heterogeneous experts. Soft Comput 26(5):2451–2463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lv J, Kang Z, Wang B, Ji L, Xu Z (2021) Multi-view subspace clustering via partition fusion. Inf Sci 560:410–423

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Bodenhofer U (2003) Representations and constructions of similarity-based fuzzy orderings. Fuzzy Sets Syst 137(1):113–136

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Zahedi Khameneh A, Kilicman A, Md Ali F (2021) Revision of pseudo-ultrametric spaces based on m-polar t-equivalences and its application in decision making. Mathematics 9(11):1232–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khameneh AZ, Kilicman A, Mahad Z (2023) A multi-view clustering algorithm for attributed weighted multi-edge directed networks. Neural Comput Appl 35(10):7779–7800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Palla G, Derenyi I, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2005) Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435(7043):814–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ertoz L, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2003) Finding clusters of different sizes, shapes, and densities in noisy, high dimensional data. In: Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM international conference on data mining, SIAM, pp. 47–58

  21. Jarvis RA, Patrick EA (1973) Clustering using a similarity measure based on shared near neighbors. IEEE Trans Comput 100(11):1025–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brito MR, Chavez EL, Quiroz AJ, Yukich JE (1997) Connectivity of the mutual k-nearest-neighbor graph in clustering and outlier detection. Statist Probab Lett 35(1):33–42

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Franti P, Virmajoki O, Hautamaki V (2006) Fast agglomerative clustering using a k-nearest neighbor graph. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(11):1875–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dong W, Moses C, Li K (2011) Efficient k-nearest neighbor graph construction for generic similarity measures. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 577–586

  25. Qin Y, Yu ZL, Wang C-D, Gu Z, Li Y (2018) A novel clustering method based on hybrid k-nearest-neighbor graph. Pattern Recogn 74:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu R, Wang H, Yu X (2018) Shared-nearest-neighbor-based clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Inf Sci 450:200–226

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Kundu PP, Mitra S (2015) Multi-objective optimization of shared nearest neighbor similarity for feature selection. Appl Soft Comput 37:751–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou S, Xu Z (2018) A novel internal validity index based on the cluster centre and the nearest neighbour cluster. Appl Soft Comput 71:78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zahedi Khameneh A, Kilicman A (2020) m-polar generalization of fuzzy t-ordering relations: an approach to group decision making. Symmetry 13(1):51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jo T, Lee M (2007) The evaluation measure of text clustering for the variable number of clusters. In: International symposium on neural networks, Springer, pp. 871–879

  31. Choudrie J, Patil S, Kotecha K, Matta N, Pappas I (2021) Applying and understanding an advanced, novel deep learning approach: a covid 19, text based, emotions analysis study. Inf Syst Front 23(6):1431–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Garcia K, Berton L (2021) Topic detection and sentiment analysis in twitter content related to COVID-19 from Brazil and the USA. Appl Soft Comput 101:107057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen T, Wang Y-C (2021) A calibrated piecewise-linear FGM approach for travel destination recommendation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Appl Soft Comput 109:107535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nimmi K, Janet B, Selvan AK, Sivakumaran N (2022) Pre-trained ensemble model for identification of emotion during COVID-19 based on emergency response support system dataset. Appl Soft Comput 122:108842

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azadeh Zahedi Khameneh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khameneh, A.Z., Ghaznavi, M., Kilicman, A. et al. A maximal-clique-based clustering approach for multi-observer multi-view data by using k-nearest neighbor with S-pseudo-ultrametric induced by a fuzzy similarity. Neural Comput & Applic 36, 9525–9550 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09560-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09560-x

Keywords

Navigation