Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design of a supply chain network for determining the optimal number of items at the inventory groups based on ABC analysis: a comparison of exact and meta-heuristic methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most applicable techniques in the inventory management field is inventory classification based on ABC analysis, a well-known method to set the items in a different group, according to their importance and values. In this paper, a bi-objective mathematical model is proposed to improve the inventory grouping based on ABC analysis. The first objective function maximizes the total net profit of the items in the central stock, and the second objective function maximizes the total net profit of items in different wards. The proposed model simultaneously optimizes the service level, the number of inventory groups, and the number of assigned items. To solve the model in small and large dimensions, two exact methods (LP-metric and ε-constraint) and two meta-heuristic methods (NSGA-II and MOPSO) are used. Then, to compare those methods in terms of efficiency, the statistical analysis besides the AHP and VIKOR techniques is implemented. The results show the superiority of the ε-constraint among the exact methods and MOPSO among meta-heuristic methods. Finally, the proposed model has been implemented in two sets of numerical examples to demonstrate its applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdolazimi O, Esfandarani MS, Salehi M, Shishebori D (2020) Robust design of a multi-objective closed-loop supply chain by integrating on-time delivery, cost, and environmental aspects, case study of a tire factory. J Clean Prod 264:121566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong DJ (1985) Sharpening inventory management. Harv Bus Rev 63(6):42–58

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arrow KJ, Harris T, Marschak J (1951) Optimal inventory policy. Econom J Econom Soc 19:250–272

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Asana IMDP, Radhitya ML, Widiartha KK, Santika PP, Wiguna IKAG (2020) Inventory control using ABC and min–max analysis on retail management information system. JPhCS 1469(1):012097

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Li KW, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2008) A case-based distance model for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Comput Oper Res 35(3):776–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu CW, Liang GS, Liao CT (2008) Controlling inventory by combining ABC analysis and fuzzy classification. Comput Ind Eng 55(4):841–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(3):256–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Darmanto E, Subanar RW, Hartati S (2019) A new integration of AdaBoost and profile matching algorithm to improve ABC analysis for drug inventory. Int J Sci Eng Res 10(2):779–788

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan TAMT (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Douissa MR, Jabeur K (2020) A non-compensatory classification approach for multi-criteria ABC analysis. Soft Computing 24(13):9525–9556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ernst R, Cohen MA (1990) Operations related groups (ORGs): a clustering procedure for production/inventory systems. J Oper Manag 9(4):574–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erlenkotter D (1989) Note—an early classic misplaced Ford W. Harris’s economic order quantity model of 1915. Manag Sci 35(7):898–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flores BE, Whybark DC (1986) Multiple criteria ABC analysis. Int J Oper Prod Manag 6:38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gong J, Luo Y, Qiu Z, Wang X (2020) Determination of key components in automobile braking systems, based on ABC classification and FMECA. J Traffic Transp Eng (English Edition)

  15. Kaabi H, Jabeur K, Enneifar L (2015) Learning criteria weights with TOPSIS method and continuous VNS for multi-criteria inventory classification. Electron Notes Discret Math 47:197–204

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Karimi-Nasab M, Shishebori D, Jalali-Naini SGR (2013) Multi-objective optimisation for pricing and distribution in a supply chain with stochastic demands. Int J Ind Syst Eng 13(1):56–72

    Google Scholar 

  17. Massart P (1990) The tight constant in the Dvoretzky–Kiefer–Wolfowitz inequality. Ann Probab 18:1269–1283

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehdizadeh M (2020) Integrating ABC analysis and rough set theory to control the inventories of distributor in the supply chain of auto spare parts. Comput Ind Eng 139:105673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Millstein MA, Yang L, Li H (2014) Optimizing ABC inventory grouping decisions. Int J Prod Econ 148:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ng WL (2007) A simple classifier for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Eur J Oper Res 177(1):344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Opricovic S (1998) Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty Civ Eng Belgrade 2(1):5–21

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Pareto, V. (1971). Manual of political economy, 1909. English translation by Kelley AM, New York.

  24. Partovi FY, Anandarajan M (2002) Classifying inventory using an artificial neural network approach. Comput Ind Eng 41(4):389–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramanathan R (2006) ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization. Comput Oper Res 33(3):695–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saaty TL (1991) Response to Holder’s comments on the analytic hierarchy process. J Oper Res Soc 42(10):909–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shakhsi-Niaei M, Esfandarani MS (2019) Multi-objective deterministic and robust models for selecting optimal pipe materials in water distribution system planning under cost, health, and environmental perspectives. J Clean Prod 207:951–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shishebori D, Babadi AY, Noormohammadzadeh Z (2018) A Lagrangian relaxation approach to fuzzy robust multi-objective facility location network design problem. Sci Iran Trans E Ind Eng 25(3):1750–1767

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shishebori D, Ghaderi A (2015) An integrated approach for reliable facility location/network design problem with link disruption. Int J Supply Oper Manag 2(1):640–661

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shishebori D, Jabalameli MS (2013) A new integrated mathematical model for optimizing facility location and network design policies with facility disruptions. Life Sci J 10(1):1896–1906

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stecca G, Baffo I, Kaihara T (2016) Design and operation of strategic inventory control system for drug delivery in healthcare industry. IFAC PapersOnLine 49(12):904–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Teunter RH, Babai MZ, Syntetos AA (2010) ABC classification: service levels and inventory costs. Prod Oper Manag 19(3):343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu MC (2011) Multi-criteria ABC analysis using artificial-intelligence-based classification techniques. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):3416–3421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economy, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

    Omid Abdolazimi

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA

    Mitra Salehi Esfandarani

  3. Department of Industrial Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

    Davood Shishebori

Authors
  1. Omid Abdolazimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mitra Salehi Esfandarani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Davood Shishebori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davood Shishebori.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdolazimi, O., Esfandarani, M.S. & Shishebori, D. Design of a supply chain network for determining the optimal number of items at the inventory groups based on ABC analysis: a comparison of exact and meta-heuristic methods. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 6641–6656 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05428-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05428-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation