Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical models for response to amino acids: estimating the response of broiler chickens to branched-chain amino acids using support vector regression and neural network models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Support vector regression (SVR) and neural network (NN) models were used to predict average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency (FE), and feed intake (FI) of broiler chickens during the starter period. Input variables for construction of the models were levels of dietary protein and branched-chain amino acids (BCAA; valine, isoleucine, and leucine). Starting with 241 lines, the SVR and NN models were trained using 120 data lines and the remainder (n = 121) was used as the testing set. The SVR models were developed using different kernel functions including: linear, polynomial (second and third order), radial basis function (RBF), and sigmoidal. In order to evaluate the SVR models, their performance was compared to that of multilayer perceptron (MLP)- and RBF-type NN models. Results indicated that MLP-type NN models were the most accurate in predicting the investigated output variables (R 2 for ADG in training and testing = 0.81 and 0.81; FE = 0.87 and 0.87; FI = 0.68 and 0.62). Among the different SVR kernels, best performance was achieved with the RBF (R 2 for ADG in training and testing = 0.76 and 0.76; FE = 0.85 and 0.87; FI = 0.46 and 0.48) and polynomial (third order) function (R 2 for ADG in training and testing = 0.77 and 0.77; FE = 0.85 and 0.87; FI = 0.46 and 0.39), whose prediction ability was better than that of the RBF-type NN (R 2 for ADG in training and testing = 0.75 and 0.75; FE = 0.82 and 0.82; FI = 0.41 and 0.39) models. Sigmoidal SVR models provided the poorest prediction. The work demonstrates that, through proper selection of kernel functions and corresponding parameters, SVR models can be considered as an alternative to NN models in predicting the response of broiler chickens to protein and BCAA. This type of model should also be applicable in poultry and other areas of animal nutrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith TK, Austic RE (1978) The branched-chain amino acid antagonism in chicks. J Nut 108:1180–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Corzo A, Dozier WA III, Kidd MT (2008) Valine nutrient recommendations for Ross × Ross 308 broilers. Poult Sci 87:335–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng CS, Chen PW, Huang KK (2011) Estimating the shift size in the process mean with support vector regression and neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 38:10624–10630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop CM (1996) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu CH (1997) Artificial neural networks for molecular sequence analysis. Comput Chem 21:232–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haykin S (1998) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Anand A, Suganthan PN (2009) Multiclass cancer classification by support vector machines with class-wise optimized genes and probability estimates. J Theor Biol 259:533–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heaton J (2015) Artificial intelligence for humans, volume 3: deep learning and neural networks. Heaton Research Inc., Chesterfield

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deng N, Tian Y, Zhang C (2013) Support vector machines. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. StatSoft (2009) Statistica data analysis software system, version 7.1. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lawrence S, Giles CL, Tsoi AC (1997) Lessons in neural network training: over-fitting may be harder than expected. Artif Intell 97:540–545

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ustun B, Melssen WJ, Oudenhuijzen M, Buydens LMC (2005) Determination of optimal support vector regression parameters by genetic algorithms and simplex optimization. Anal Chim Act 544:292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thornley JHM, France J (2007) Mathematical models in agriculture, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Bertsekas DP (1999) Nonlinear programming, 2nd edn. Athena Scientific, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Belousov AI, Verzakov SA, VanFrese J (2002) A flexible classification approach with optimal generalization performance: support vector machines. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 64:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Arlot S, Celisse A (2010) A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat Surv 4:40–79

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Polat K, Gunes S (2007) Breast cancer diagnosis using least square support vector machine. Digit Signal Process 17:694–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nazghelichi T, Aghbashlo M, Kianmehr MH (2011) Optimization of an artificial neural network topology using coupled response surface methodology and genetic algorithm for fluidized bed drying. Comput Electron Agric 75:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Faridi A, Golian A, France J (2012) Evaluating the egg production behavior of broiler breeder hens in response to dietary nutrient intake during 31–60 weeks of age through neural network models. Can J Anim Sci 92:473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Faridi A, Sakomura NK, Golian A, Marcato SM (2012) Predicting body and carcass characteristics of 2 broiler chicken strains using support vector regression and neural network models. Poult Sci 91:3286–3294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Faridi A, Golian A, Heravi Mousavi A, France J (2014) Bootstrapped neural network models for analyzing the responses of broiler chicks to dietary protein and branched chain amino acids. Can J Anim Sci 94:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mariano FCMQ, Paixão CA, Lima RR, Alvarenga RR, Rodrigues PB, Nascimento GAJ (2013) Prediction of energy values of feedstuffs for broilers using meta-analysis and neural networks. Animal 7:1440–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. King SL, Bennett KP, List S (2000) Modeling non-catastrophic individual tree mortality using logistic regression, neural networks, and support vector methods. Comput Electron Agric 27:401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lemme A, Frackenpohl U, Petri A, Meyer H (2006) Response of male BUT big 6 turkeys to varying amino acid feeding programs. Poult Sci 85:652–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Faridi A, Mottaghitalab M, Rezaee F, France J (2011) Narushin-Takma models as flexible alternatives for describing economic traits in broiler breeder flocks. Poult Sci 90:507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Park BC, Austic RE (2000) Isoleucine imbalance using selected mixtures of imbalancing amino acids in diets of the broiler chick. Poult Sci 79:1782–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Corzo A, Kidd MT, Dozier WA III, Vieira SL (2007) Marginality and needs of dietary valine for broilers fed certain all-vegetable diets. J Appl Poult Res 16:546–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lehninger AL (1981) Oxidative degradation of amino acids. Biochemistry, 2nd edn. Worth Publishers, New York, pp 559–586

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sashihara K, Miyamoto M, Ohgushi A, Denbow DM, Furuse M (2001) Influence of ketone body and the inhibition of fatty acid oxidation on the food intake of the chick. Br Poult Sci 42:405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fisher H, Griminger P, Leveille GA, Shapiro R (1960) Quantitative aspects of lysine deficiency and amino acid imbalance. J Nutr 71:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Burnham D, Emmans GC, Gous RM (1992) Isoleucine requirements of the chicken: the effect of excess leucine and valine on the response to isoleucine. Br Poult Sci 33:71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Waldroup PW, Kersey JH, Fritts CA (2002) Influence of branched-chain amino acid balance in broiler diets. Int J Poult Sci 1:136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Farran MT, Brabour EK, Ashkarian VM (2003) Effect of excess leucine in low protein diet on ketosis in 3-week-old male broiler chicks fed different levels of isoleucine and valine. Anim Feed Sci Technol 103:171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Barbour G, Latshaw JD (1992) Isoleucine requirements of broiler chicks as affected by the concentration of leucine and valine in practical diets. Br Poult Sci 33:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Farran MT, Thomas OP (1990) Dietary requirements of leucine, isoleucine, and valine in male broilers during the starter period. Poult Sci 69:757–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tavernari FC, Lelis GR, Vieira RA, Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Oliveira Neto AR (2013) Valine needs in starting and growing Cobb (500) broilers. Poult Sci 92:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Farran MT, Thomas OP (1992) Valine deficiency: 1. The effect of feeding a valine-deficient diet during the starter period on performance and feather structure of male broiler chicks. Poult Sci 71:1879–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. St-Pierre NR (2001) Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. J Dairy Sci 84:741–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Faridi A, Gitoee A, France J (2015) A meta-analysis of the effects of nonphytate phosphorus on broiler performance and tibia ash concentration. Poult Sci 94:2753–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Canada Research Chairs program (National Science and Engineering Council, Ottawa) is thanked for part funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. France.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gitoee, A., Faridi, A. & France, J. Mathematical models for response to amino acids: estimating the response of broiler chickens to branched-chain amino acids using support vector regression and neural network models. Neural Comput & Applic 30, 2499–2508 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2842-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2842-x

Keywords

Navigation